Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Reject Amendment by Specter
AP ^ | 9/28/6 | ANNE PLUMMER FLAHERTY

Posted on 09/28/2006 10:32:54 AM PDT by SmithL

The Senate, siding with President Bush shortly after he personally lobbied lawmakers at the Capitol, rejected a move Thursday by a leading Republican to allow terrorism suspects to challenge their imprisonment in court.

The vote paved the way for final passage of Bush's plan to establish "military commissions" to prosecute terrorism suspects in legislation that also spells out violations of the Geneva Conventions, a treaty that sets international standards for the treatment of war prisoners.

Republicans say the bill is necessary to ensure that terrorists can be brought to justice and that CIA personnel will not be charged with war crimes when interrogating these suspects.

Barring any last-minute hiccups, the bill could reach the president's desk as early as Friday.

Bush had gone to Capitol Hill earlier Thursday, urging senators to follow the House lead and approve the plan. "The American people need to know we're working together to win the war on terror," he told reporters as he left.

The Senate voted 48-51 against an amendment by Sen. Arlen Specter that would have allowed terror suspects to file "habeas corpus" petitions in court. Specter contends the ability to such pleas is considered a fundamental legal right and is necessary to uncover abuse.

"This is a constitutional requirement and it is fundamental that Congress not legislate contradiction to a constitutional interpretation of the Supreme Court," said Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Three Republicans voted with Specter but others in the GOP caucus contended that providing terror suspects the right to unlimited appeals weighs down the federal court system.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: angusmacspecter; arlenspecter; specter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 09/28/2006 10:32:55 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"Backstabbing Specter" bump!


2 posted on 09/28/2006 10:34:32 AM PDT by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I hope Spectre is properly Red-assed over this. He is such a jerk.


3 posted on 09/28/2006 10:34:45 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Specter -- an Albatross President Bush deserves, due to supporting this turkey over the REAL Republican in the primary..

Semper Fi
4 posted on 09/28/2006 10:35:24 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: talleyman

Exactly. Headline should be "Specters Backstabbing Stunt Backfires".


5 posted on 09/28/2006 10:35:27 AM PDT by Ron in Acreage (VOTE DEMOCRAT--TERRORISTS ARE COUNTING ON IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
'Three Republicans voted with Specter'

I wonder who these were?

6 posted on 09/28/2006 10:36:06 AM PDT by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Specter...you can just bite me. :(


7 posted on 09/28/2006 10:36:43 AM PDT by PjhCPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Thank God.


8 posted on 09/28/2006 10:36:53 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Good.

As usual, "Just say NO to RINOs".

9 posted on 09/28/2006 10:36:59 AM PDT by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Well, the question seemed to be whether we wanted Specter or an even-further-left Dem in that seat. Lesser of two evils.


10 posted on 09/28/2006 10:37:33 AM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mathluv
I wonder who these were?

Let me guess: Chafee, McPain, and Goober?

11 posted on 09/28/2006 10:38:00 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (The race is on http://BlackwellvStrickland.blogspot.com (now linked on RealClearPolitics.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Specter is a senile jerk, on Iraq, Bush needs to untie the hands of the military and make a few quick and useful examples of our might. They only understand force and death.


12 posted on 09/28/2006 10:38:47 AM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Arlen Sphincter's at it again.
13 posted on 09/28/2006 10:38:56 AM PDT by b4its2late (I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

Another Specter cunning stunt?


14 posted on 09/28/2006 10:38:57 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
Just tried to call Specter's office. Line is busy! Hah, he probably took the phone off the hook.

I did want to ask if he was good friends with Lynn Stewart.

Google her name and tell me what you think!

15 posted on 09/28/2006 10:39:44 AM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Specter= Exhibit two at why the "New Tone" never worked in DC.


16 posted on 09/28/2006 10:40:29 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"This is a constitutional requirement and it is fundamental that Congress not legislate contradiction to a constitutional interpretation of the Supreme Court," said Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

This is absolutely insane!

Specter, and others like him, actually believe we should fight a war in the courtroom. I'm astonished at the level of depraved indifference toward the future existence of the United States.

Is incremental treason still treason? I think so.

17 posted on 09/28/2006 10:42:25 AM PDT by TChris (The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Isn't she that lawyer in NY? A real defender of 'human rights'--ala Sen. Sphincter.
18 posted on 09/28/2006 10:43:09 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

The other three were Chafee, Smith (OR), Sununu.


19 posted on 09/28/2006 10:43:44 AM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Yes!!!!

Republican Weasel Wing = McCacain, Spector, Warner, Graham, Hagel..... :)

20 posted on 09/28/2006 10:43:53 AM PDT by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson