*sigh* OK, lets dance this dance again on THIS thread. It is sad that you keep posting the same non-sequituers and bald assertions, get slapped down with facts and argumentation, then pop up on the next thread as if you hadn't already been schooled. Do you have that memory problem Dora in "Finding Nemo" had? Because they have treatment for that (courtesy of a combination of Biology and Chemistry, both of which rely on TToE).
TToE is on par with Physics, Astronomy (which is a much anti-Genesis as TToE), and Chemistry (also anti-Genesis).
Chemistry does not rely on the ToE. I've taken my share of college chemisty courses and the TOE never entered into them even once. It would be much more accurate to say that the ToE depended on chemistry.
As far as Bio, there's plenty to study there, too, that doesn't require the ToE at all. And I've taken those too, and while ToE is encountered more, the stuff I studied didn't *depend* on it.
So how is Astronomy and Chemistry *anti-Genesis*?
Pardon my French, but WTF?
The Pauli exclusion principle, quantum mechanics, and ionic bonding (for example) do not 'rely' on TToE...
Could you be more specific, or rephrase that, please?
(I might just have misread the post, or taken it out of context.)
Cheers!