To: finnman69
The "70 million year" figure is highly debatable, and, contrary to popular belief, highly subjective. There are huge disagreements as to the validity of the "accepted" ages....or what those ages actually are.
220 posted on
09/27/2006 2:48:18 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: LiteKeeper
The "70 million year" figure is highly debatable, and, contrary to popular belief, highly subjective. There are huge disagreements as to the validity of the "accepted" ages....or what those ages actually are. 'highly debatable' like what really caused the WTC towers to collapse.
Creationists are much like the WTC conspiracists in terms of their similar passionate achievement of total belief in something that did not happen.
393 posted on
09/27/2006 9:54:04 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: LiteKeeper
The "70 million year" figure is highly debatable, and, contrary to popular belief, highly subjective. There are huge disagreements as to the validity of the "accepted" ages....or what those ages actually are. But not in magnitude.
You are describing Galactic Linguists debating the prevalence of "jynnantonnyx."
396 posted on
09/27/2006 10:00:42 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson