Let the puns begin...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: RadioAstronomer; longshadow; grey_whiskers; PatrickHenry; headsonpikes; Iris7; Junior; ...
To: snarks_when_bored
"Physicists say they have made an object move just by watching it."
Physicists have a habit of describing what they have discovered in ways that interest the public, but are not really accurate--at least not accurate if you would ask the average guy.
If you've got a particle, you can't just "watch it." It's too small. You use a probe to see if it's there. Or you might shine a light on it, if it's big enough. You use high tech equipment to measure its charge, and that will give away its position.
Of course, when you do any of those things, the particle is nudged a little bit. When you touch it with a probe, shine light on it, or test its charge, it moves.
It would be more accurate to say that they are making it move by "touching it," but then that would not be such a big headline.
4 posted on
09/26/2006 4:39:06 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: snarks_when_bored
9 posted on
09/26/2006 4:46:12 AM PDT by
Loyalist
(Social justice isn't; social studies aren't; social work doesn't.)
To: snarks_when_bored
looking for love in both the wrong places
To: snarks_when_bored
Physicists say they have made an object move just by watching it.
I can do that after several bourbons. I can even put the same object in 2 or 3 places at the same time. Nothing new here.
15 posted on
09/26/2006 4:52:57 AM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: snarks_when_bored
Bill CLinton seems to have done that all the time. He also could see all three sides of a two-sided issue. I think we should give him a Nobel Prize for Physics and let him mount it in the museum down in Hope, Ark.
18 posted on
09/26/2006 4:57:12 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Robert Heinlein's 5 grades of coffee: Java, Cafe, Jamocha, Joe, Carbon Remover)
To: snarks_when_bored
Physicists say they have made an object move just by watching it.(Laz looks at his crotch)
24 posted on
09/26/2006 5:24:34 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a pathological disorder masquerading as a religion.)
To: snarks_when_bored
"Physicists say they have made an object move just by watching it." Hell, my mother could do that!............."Take out the garbage"....."Mow the lawn"......etc......
25 posted on
09/26/2006 5:30:49 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is Castro DEAD YET?........)
To: snarks_when_bored
All I want to know is - does the Cat live?
28 posted on
09/26/2006 6:08:56 AM PDT by
headsonpikes
(Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
To: snarks_when_bored
A new variation of the old boson-fermian trick?
32 posted on
09/26/2006 6:28:11 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: snarks_when_bored
Physicists seek to put one thing in two places Big deal. So do porn stars.
To: snarks_when_bored
Sounds almost, well, Newtonian.
34 posted on
09/26/2006 6:29:32 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: snarks_when_bored
"This effect, Schwab said, is a basically quantum-mechanical phenomenon called back-action, in which the act of observing something actually gives it a nudge." Ahah! Eureka! Forsooth! Verily! Is there a possibility that a tree falling in the forest makes no sound unless someone is listening?
To: lonevoice
To: snarks_when_bored
Physicists seek to put one thing in two places Which is why Schrödinger used cats for his famous thought experiment. A cat could be meowing in front of her food bowl, knocking things off of her favorite shelf and getting under your feet simultaneously. Cats are also good at quantum tunneling where you can block all paths from point A to point B but the cat still moves between them.
40 posted on
09/26/2006 6:53:46 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Dems - Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy, yet few of you have heart enough to join them.)
To: snarks_when_bored
"... made an object move just by watching it." Not really. Simply an admission that for very tiny objects, the light that illuminates them can also give a tiny push.
I don't suppose they are willing to claim they can make an object move by watching it in the dark.
42 posted on
09/26/2006 7:12:08 AM PDT by
NicknamedBob
(If the "enemy of your enemy" is Ghengis Khan, Ghengis Khan is not your friend.)
To: snarks_when_bored
I once knew a guy named Vinnie who ended up in several places at once. In small, green, trash bags...
43 posted on
09/26/2006 7:18:58 AM PDT by
Junior
(I kn)
To: snarks_when_bored
The gray sliver reaching from top to bottom, slanted in the image, is a nanomechanical resonator, a sub-microscopic device that can vibrate like a piano string. The image was taken with a scanning electron microscope and colorized. BZZZZT. PARITY EXCEPTION IE00007E00013A. GUTEN ABEND.
44 posted on
09/26/2006 7:29:32 AM PDT by
Erasmus
(I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
To: snarks_when_bored
45 posted on
09/26/2006 7:32:14 AM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: snarks_when_bored
I can make guys on the golf channel miss a putt, just by thinking.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson