Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reliable Sources’ Panel Rips Clinton’s 'Fox News Sunday' Tirade
Newsbusters ^ | Sept. 25, 2006 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 09/25/2006 7:17:39 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2006 7:17:40 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Clinton is an arrogant, perverted ass. And so is her "husband."


2 posted on 09/25/2006 7:19:33 AM PDT by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Anthing where Arianna Huffington is involved has 0 credibility.


3 posted on 09/25/2006 7:23:19 AM PDT by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

Monday Morning PING!


4 posted on 09/25/2006 7:23:21 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Huffington is still kissing up to her main drool Clinton.

Only in your dreams, Arianna.......you're too much like the one he's still shackled to.

Leni

5 posted on 09/25/2006 7:25:02 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Israel, Hold Firm !................No Retreat means No Repeat !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I find it interesting that he wagged his finger in Wallace's face much like he did in OUR face when he said "I did not have sex with that woman.... Ms. Lewinsky... not once, ever!!!"

Now, I can care less about Clinton's infidelity...however, when he engaged in such acts in the Oval Office, it put him in a position where it could dominate his ability to execute his responsibilities as president. THAT is what it was all about.

This is why the military does not allow homosexuals or adulterers...they become compromised...an unable to perform their duties effectively.

Someone should ask him about that "Did your affair inside the Oval Office with a subordinate not interfere with your ability to secure the people of the USA from the terror attacks of Osama Bin Laden by creating a "wag the dog" image for any attacks you might have taken?"


6 posted on 09/25/2006 7:25:16 AM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I love that picture....

Clinton really blew the interview. He is so used to being thrown easy pitches that when one is a little tough to answer he decided to NOT answer it and go apesh*t.

I think it is telling that even Clinton probably felt that he ignored the Osama too much.


7 posted on 09/25/2006 7:27:22 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.

Umm, no. He wants the American Public to believe that there is such a conspiracy. He and Her Heinous know it isn't true (to the extent that they know what "true" means.)

8 posted on 09/25/2006 7:27:49 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

"Did your affair inside the Oval Office with a subordinate not interfere with your ability to secure the people of the USA from the terror attacks of Osama Bin Laden by creating a 'wag the dog' image for any attacks you might have taken?"

This is the most pertinent question, and of course the answer is a resounding yes.


9 posted on 09/25/2006 7:31:07 AM PDT by andonte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
SIMON: I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.
SIMON: I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once infamously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.
10 posted on 09/25/2006 7:31:38 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Thank you. Why does anyone listen to her? What credentials does she have? That she once worked as a beard for a failed Senate candidate?


11 posted on 09/25/2006 7:34:11 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
“I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton. That may be true. I'm not sure Chris Wallace is part of it, however. I think Chris Wallace was simply acting like a newsman.”

Priceless...

wait till tonight... the DBM... Spitboy Matthews in particular, will be claiming Clinton a feisty old warhorse... smacking down that right-wing hack Wallace!

12 posted on 09/25/2006 7:34:36 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
He sure was slurring his words a lot, too. Had he been drinking before the interview? Dick Morris has written that Billy Boy was something of a bully anyways and did use hand gestures and pseudo-slaps that could be peceived as threats.

If I were Wallace, I'd have told him to keep his hands off of me when Clinton started the pointing that ended up as physical contact. Technically that's considered assault.

13 posted on 09/25/2006 7:35:08 AM PDT by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Indeed.


14 posted on 09/25/2006 7:35:51 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Using the words "Clintons" and "true" in the same sentence and context almost made me choke on my coffee!

15 posted on 09/25/2006 7:36:57 AM PDT by Clifford The Big Red Dog (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Is Richard Clarke's book really worth reading? I thought reviews of it stated that he was more critical of the Bush Administration than the Clinton Administration.

The Path to 9/11 made him out to be one of the heroes of the film, but maybe it just seemed that way because he was played by Stephen Root, who always comes across as one of the good guys.


16 posted on 09/25/2006 7:38:20 AM PDT by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Boy, you got Matthews right.

Let's hear from Krauthammer. Charlie's brilliant.

17 posted on 09/25/2006 7:43:14 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Clinton was pathetic in that interview.


18 posted on 09/25/2006 7:43:59 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

Yep. Playing the victim bypasses scrutiny by their voters.


19 posted on 09/25/2006 7:45:03 AM PDT by kenth (There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
Clinton is lying when he wags his finger. We've seen it before.
20 posted on 09/25/2006 7:45:35 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson