Skip to comments.
Reliable Sources’ Panel Rips Clinton’s 'Fox News Sunday' Tirade
Newsbusters ^
| Sept. 25, 2006
| Noel Sheppard
Posted on 09/25/2006 7:17:39 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: COUNTrecount
Clinton is an arrogant, perverted ass. And so is her "husband."
2
posted on
09/25/2006 7:19:33 AM PDT
by
laweeks
(I)
To: All
Anthing where Arianna Huffington is involved has 0 credibility.
3
posted on
09/25/2006 7:23:19 AM PDT
by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
To: laweeks
To: COUNTrecount
Huffington is still kissing up to her main drool Clinton.
Only in your dreams, Arianna.......you're too much like the one he's still shackled to.
Leni
5
posted on
09/25/2006 7:25:02 AM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Israel, Hold Firm !................No Retreat means No Repeat !)
To: COUNTrecount
I find it interesting that he wagged his finger in Wallace's face much like he did in OUR face when he said "I did not have sex with that woman.... Ms. Lewinsky... not once, ever!!!"
Now, I can care less about Clinton's infidelity...however, when he engaged in such acts in the Oval Office, it put him in a position where it could dominate his ability to execute his responsibilities as president. THAT is what it was all about.
This is why the military does not allow homosexuals or adulterers...they become compromised...an unable to perform their duties effectively.
Someone should ask him about that "Did your affair inside the Oval Office with a subordinate not interfere with your ability to secure the people of the USA from the terror attacks of Osama Bin Laden by creating a "wag the dog" image for any attacks you might have taken?"
6
posted on
09/25/2006 7:25:16 AM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: COUNTrecount
I love that picture....
Clinton really blew the interview. He is so used to being thrown easy pitches that when one is a little tough to answer he decided to NOT answer it and go apesh*t.
I think it is telling that even Clinton probably felt that he ignored the Osama too much.
7
posted on
09/25/2006 7:27:22 AM PDT
by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: COUNTrecount
I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.Umm, no. He wants the American Public to believe that there is such a conspiracy. He and Her Heinous know it isn't true (to the extent that they know what "true" means.)
8
posted on
09/25/2006 7:27:49 AM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: Paloma_55
"Did your affair inside the Oval Office with a subordinate not interfere with your ability to secure the people of the USA from the terror attacks of Osama Bin Laden by creating a 'wag the dog' image for any attacks you might have taken?"
This is the most pertinent question, and of course the answer is a resounding yes.
9
posted on
09/25/2006 7:31:07 AM PDT
by
andonte
To: COUNTrecount
SIMON: I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.
SIMON: I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once infamously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton.
10
posted on
09/25/2006 7:31:38 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: ElPatriota
Thank you. Why does anyone listen to her? What credentials does she have? That she once worked as a beard for a failed Senate candidate?
11
posted on
09/25/2006 7:34:11 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: COUNTrecount
I think what his answer shows is that he believes, as his wife once famously said, there is a vast right wing conspiracy out to get the Clinton. That may be true. I'm not sure Chris Wallace is part of it, however. I think Chris Wallace was simply acting like a newsman. Priceless...
wait till tonight... the DBM... Spitboy Matthews in particular, will be claiming Clinton a feisty old warhorse... smacking down that right-wing hack Wallace!
12
posted on
09/25/2006 7:34:36 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: COUNTrecount
He sure was slurring his words a lot, too. Had he been drinking before the interview? Dick Morris has written that Billy Boy was something of a bully anyways and did use hand gestures and pseudo-slaps that could be peceived as threats.
If I were Wallace, I'd have told him to keep his hands off of me when Clinton started the pointing that ended up as physical contact. Technically that's considered assault.
To: ElPatriota
14
posted on
09/25/2006 7:35:51 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Using the words "Clintons" and "true" in the same sentence and context almost made me choke on my coffee!
To: COUNTrecount
Is Richard Clarke's book really worth reading? I thought reviews of it stated that he was more critical of the Bush Administration than the Clinton Administration.
The Path to 9/11 made him out to be one of the heroes of the film, but maybe it just seemed that way because he was played by Stephen Root, who always comes across as one of the good guys.
16
posted on
09/25/2006 7:38:20 AM PDT
by
BaBaStooey
(I heart Emma Caulfield.)
To: johnny7
Boy, you got Matthews right.
Let's hear from Krauthammer. Charlie's brilliant.
17
posted on
09/25/2006 7:43:14 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: oh8eleven
Clinton was pathetic in that interview.
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Yep. Playing the victim bypasses scrutiny by their voters.
19
posted on
09/25/2006 7:45:03 AM PDT
by
kenth
(There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
To: Paloma_55
Clinton is lying when he wags his finger. We've seen it before.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson