Skip to comments.
Aborted crosswind landing in an Airbus
Videosift ^
| September 25, 2006
| Video Capture
Posted on 09/25/2006 5:36:53 AM PDT by TommyDale
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Just another reason for choosing Boeing...
1
posted on
09/25/2006 5:36:55 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
To: TommyDale
If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going.........
2
posted on
09/25/2006 5:37:57 AM PDT
by
aviator
(Armored Pest Control)
To: TommyDale
3
posted on
09/25/2006 5:38:36 AM PDT
by
Rummenigge
(there's people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
To: TommyDale
I'd have to change my pants after that approach!
To: Rummenigge
that was an airbus. Yes, that was indicated in the headline.
5
posted on
09/25/2006 5:39:46 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: TommyDale
Based on how the plane was crabbed during the late final I'd say that was a heavy crosswind. I'm not sure how much of what we saw was due to the aircraft, due to the pilot, and especially due to the fact that a landing should not have been attempted on that runway at that time.
Shalom.
6
posted on
09/25/2006 5:40:58 AM PDT
by
ArGee
(The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands.)
To: TommyDale
Does anyone actually know if a Boeing would perform better in similar circumstances, or are we Airbus-bashing?
7
posted on
09/25/2006 5:42:47 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: TommyDale
Kind of on the mild side... Go to you tube and type in cross wind in the search bar. You'll get a lot of these, some are done as tests on airfields known for constant cross winds. They will make your hair stand on end.
8
posted on
09/25/2006 5:43:37 AM PDT
by
SunTzuWu
(Hans Delbruck - Scientist and Saint.)
To: aviator
He was just practicing his "touch 'n goes", that's all..........
9
posted on
09/25/2006 5:46:01 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Is Castro DEAD YET?........)
To: TommyDale
Geez, talk about groping for pavement!! Glad the pilot was able to stabilize after he hit the throttle.
10
posted on
09/25/2006 5:46:25 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
To: ArGee
Dead on analysis. If the crosswind was that strong, he should never have been goven clearance to land.
11
posted on
09/25/2006 5:49:17 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: TommyDale
Good pilot. (I think. Of course, it's brain surgery to me, so what do I know?)
To: TommyDale
I don't think the model of aircraft is an issue with crosswinds like that.
13
posted on
09/25/2006 5:49:53 AM PDT
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: 1rudeboy
I am strictly Airbus bashing. :-)
14
posted on
09/25/2006 5:50:09 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: TommyDale
15
posted on
09/25/2006 5:50:58 AM PDT
by
Toby06
(Hydrogen is not a fuel source. Hydrogen is an energy storage method, like a battery.)
To: SunTzuWu
You'll get a lot of these, some are done as tests on airfields known for constant cross winds. They will make your hair stand on end. I took some flying lessons in a Cessna in Ithaca back in the early 1980s. On one solo lesson I was doing touch-n-gos and the tower was giving me wind updates about every 5 seconds. It was a real mess. I managed to make the landing each time, but it was all struggle and the Cessna is a trainer that is easy to control. I'd hate to be in that kind of situation with anything bigger.
Shalom.
16
posted on
09/25/2006 5:52:12 AM PDT
by
ArGee
(The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands.)
To: 1rudeboy
A Boeing would have the same problems.......it's the wind affecting the plane. Sometimes you are lucky as the winds will smooth out a bit nearer to the surface.
This guy almost had it made.....until the last wind gust caused the big wing dip and the go-around.
17
posted on
09/25/2006 5:52:18 AM PDT
by
aviator
(Armored Pest Control)
To: DustyMoment
If the crosswind was that strong, he should never have been goven clearance to land. Back when I was taking lessons my instructor made it very clear to me that the tower could provide information but I was absolutely resopnsible for what I did with my plane. The tower could give me clearance, but it was up to me to make a determination as to whether I could land safely.
I don't know if the same is true with bigger craft, but I can't imagine taking any other attitude with 100 or more people's lives in my hands.
Shalom.
18
posted on
09/25/2006 5:54:10 AM PDT
by
ArGee
(The Ring must not be allowed to fall into Hillary's hands.)
To: TommyDale
TommyDale wrote: "Just another reason for choosing Boeing..."
My To Do List for Today
1. Call favorite airlines.
2. Ask each airline if they use Airbus, Boeing and/or McDonnell Douglas.
3. Cross Airbus airlines off list.
4. Thank TommyDale for sharing this video link.
Thank you TommyDale!
19
posted on
09/25/2006 5:55:02 AM PDT
by
bd476
To: TommyDale
If you're going to bash Airbust, do it for reasons that have to do with the quality (or lack thereof) of their products. This video had nothing to do with the aircraft and I am not sure a Boeing would have done much better.
Now, had you decided to criticize the decision-making of the Portuguese pilot, that's a completely different issue and one where you would find a lot of support.
20
posted on
09/25/2006 5:56:43 AM PDT
by
JRios1968
(Tagline wanted...inquire within)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson