Clinton defends himself in Fox interview

Associated Press ^ | 09/24/06

[Just mythoughts]

Clinton did not look presidential he looked like a two year old throwing a temper tantrum in an adult body. There was nothing 'nice' or appealing about his performance and the 'kooks' do not need to be convinced, it is the middle can't decide moderates, required for election winning.

There is nobody in this nation that can remember that anybody was complaining about Clinton being obsessed with getting OBL. The wag the dog was over Iraq not OBL which was a bald face lie on Clinton's part.

So while I agree he came in looking to score some political points he flopped cause he look like a pathetic sore loser, and a bad one at that.

Nobody outside of the politically alert have a clue who Richard Clarke was or is so Clinton's continual ordering of reading his book was about WHAT? Does he gain a commission of book sales Sunday onward?

[Vn_survivor_67-68]

"...Clinton's continual ordering of reading his book was about WHAT? Does he gain a commission of book sales Sunday onward?"

All I know about the book (pub 2004) is that Clark wrote it after becoming disgruntled about Bush not making him Sec of Homeland Security.....thus he went very easy on Clinton and bashed the daylights out of Bush for going into Iraq, making some nebulous distinction between Iraq and the overall WOT......of course history is that the left and moozies followed suit.......so any chump that reads it now at Clintons urging will get a load of BushBashing and Clinton pretty much gets a pass, consistent with his "I failed, but I tried to get bin Laden, more than anyone since". Oh yeah, Clinton also threw in a "Clark was demoted" (by Bush).

I'll bet Billy boy practiced in front of a mirror before the Wallace interview.

[anonsquared]

THANK YOU for that! TOO FUNNY!

[anonsquared]

KosmicKitty was sweet enough to provide this in post #95 of this thread.

" It's been done http://wizbangblog.com/2006/09/23/compare-and-contrast.php "

[KC_Conspirator]

If this were a blowup by a Republican, there would be a different headline.

[Candor7]

We both see the same strategy but interpret it differently.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Lets hope that the Democrat Party will become like the snake swallowing its tail, which can happen no matter which interpretation comes to pass.

I think Hillary is thru, and that a fire breathing leftist demogogue is about to come forward to preach to the unwashed of the Dim party, even unto militancy and violence.

You know , the sort of revivalist you see at leftist meetings , who can make the masses glassy eyed and thoughtless.

Will it be Obama?

Or maybe someone we do not yet know?