Posted on 09/24/2006 3:15:07 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
Uh-Oh, here comes a Juan Smackdown! Juan is telling all how Bush is causing more terrorism
WOW --- that's most interesting and revealing.
Will we ever get rid of these people?
I, along with many others, would love for him to clarify his contracting comments.
I don't think Clinton hired any assassins. Everything we know- through leaks, etc, shows he was always wanting to hadn the Osama hot potato to someone else. I think when he says this, he is referring to the aid and support we gave to Shah Masood and the Northern Allience.
I could be wrong. But I think if he had sone a contract with some hired assassin(s), it would have come our by now. He has enough detracters on this.
If I am right- it just shows how BJ goes into automatic "cover my ass" with spin mode.
If I am wrong, it not only shows why he and Hitlery can't do an interview or press conference without strict control due to their hot tempers and lack of control when called to accountability, but it also means we have a former President that has claimed he actually DID DO what the media jumped all over a Christian Leader for SUGGESTING we do with Chavez.
It's from 2004....
FBI's Freeh said he only saw Clinton three times and talked to him on the phone about the same number. So that's six but even twice that is not as many as the number of times Clinton called Monica for phone sex (15).
FBI's Freeh said he only saw Clinton three times and talked to him on the phone about the same number. So that's six but even twice that is not as many as the number of times Clinton called Monica for phone sex (15).
I expect we'll be seeing Anne Lewis and Lanny Davis on TV very soon defending Clinton....always the sign that he is in big trouble.
Fox Network pressure from Murdoch who wants to treat Clinton with kid gloves. They don't want to be seen as being controlled by the RNC.
Just damn.
They will respond to the NYT's damn article.....
Right.
Well, even Britt is too subdued with responses that he could easily hit Juan over the head with.
Agreed. They could have dissected everything that Clinton said and proved how much he was lying. There are plenty of primary sources and to accept Clarke's version is nonsense.
All good points. By comparison to President Bush, Clinton still thought the law did not apply to himself, and the press has been pretty selective in who to bash and over what reasons.
Either way, it proves the point of Bush being unfairly attacked by the media and the Democrats.
Put a photo of the 2 together and I think that most people who rely on the MSM for their news would be surprised.
Thanks! Great catch.
Good morning Kabar...I used that OBL quote out of his Declaration of War in a LTE published Wednesday...
http://greenvilleonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060921/OPINION/609210305/1010
Third letter!
".....Freeh claimed, the former president failed to press Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to let the FBI question Saudi-held suspects in the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing -- and instead hit up the Crown Prince for a financial donation to his presidential library"
This is basically an accusation that Clinton's foreign policy objectives were tailored to his pocketbook. As profound a dereliction of duty and outright treason as I have ever seen. I wonder if the JAG has jurisdiction when it come to the CIC/POTUS? Somebodies are beginning to pressure WJC on this issue...IMHO.
Let us know what you know about Kim Hume. That is really worrrying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.