Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 24 September 2006
Various big media television networks ^ | 24 September 2006 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 09/24/2006 3:15:07 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



Sunday, September 24th, 2006

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Bill Clinton (D-FIRPOTUS); Sen. Lindsey Graham, (R-S.C.); Dr. JoGayle Howard, National Zoo panda doctor.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Bill Clinton (D-Arkancide); Afghan President Hamid Karzai; John Danforth, former senator and U.N. ambassador.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. John McCain, (R-Ariz.)

THIS WEEK (ABC): Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, (R-Tenn.); New Jersey Senate candidates Sen. Bob Menendez, (D-N.J.), and Republican Tom Kean Jr.

LATE EDITION (CNN) : Karzai; Sen. Arlen Specter, (R-Pa.); Rep. Jane Harman, (D-Calif.); Iraqi President Jalal Talibani; Alexander Haig, former secretary of state; Richard Holbrooke, former U.N. ambassador.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; nieleak; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,321-1,328 next last
To: A.Hun
You're right, it's a toss up. There are a lot of dumb people in the US.

I look for the Dems to lose again this year though, and the moonbats concentrate their fury on "moderates" like Hitlery and Biden.

If so, we might have Howard Dean for the nominee in '08. Republicans could run Howdy Doody and beat Dean like a drum. 

If the Dhimmicrats lose this year, even if they win seats but don't win back control of either house, then I predict the break up of the Democrat party as we know it.  Howard Dean will compete for the nomination of the new Progressive Democrats.  Hillary will be competing for the nomination of the Real (DLC) Democrats.  What will be interesting is to see where the ethnic groups go.  I bet it's to neither of these camps. 

1,121 posted on 09/24/2006 3:38:29 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Russert's on here. Is there a thread started?

This would be it. 

1,122 posted on 09/24/2006 3:39:43 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: marajade

I used to think so too,but today Brit was a huge disappointment,and he could have done a lot to refute everything and he was weak. Very weak,very lame, totally out of the norm.


1,123 posted on 09/24/2006 3:39:51 PM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

I was in Tampa Bay for years .. so I sure love Ronde and Tiki AND their special Mom.


1,124 posted on 09/24/2006 3:40:15 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

My personal opinion is that Brit will not renew his contract,..

I have been suspecting the same thing. He has been taking more and more time away from his regularly scheduled appearances. I hope he and Kim are well, and just want to enjoy their country estate.


1,125 posted on 09/24/2006 3:40:27 PM PDT by maica (9/11 was not “the day everything changed”, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: rr1954

I think the panel held back because Clinton did the damage all by himself.


%%%%%

Ditto. If the panel had attacked his words, all the soundbites tomorrow would have been of the "mean-spirited Fox panel." Now the focus remains on angry delusional BJC.


1,126 posted on 09/24/2006 3:43:30 PM PDT by maica (9/11 was not “the day everything changed”, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Yet another example of Clinton parsing was Clinton saying that Clarke's book was not based on "opinions" but on "assertions."

Clinton should realize that by pointing to Clarke as the one person who took terrorism seriously validates the contention that Clinton did not take terrorism seriously!


1,127 posted on 09/24/2006 3:43:50 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1115 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat; RobFromGa

Perhaps...it was a curtain..yeah..a curtain, as in "pay no attention to the man behind..."

Oh never mind...she must have had a Pink Floyd moment;)


1,128 posted on 09/24/2006 3:45:51 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1066 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Right, and one poster today said the best kept Secret during the Clinton Administration was Slickie's Medical Files. If we think about it now, he was probably telling his Doctor what to do,and meanwhile his Health was going down the tubes. I thought it was considerate of Slickie to not have a heart attack while he was still President so we were not stuck with Algore as an incumbent. We need to thank all those Rino Senators also for voting against Guilty after the Impeachment,and for Slickie fighting it all the way. That also kept algore from being an incumbent.
1,129 posted on 09/24/2006 3:48:11 PM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1098 | View Replies]

To: samantha

I just saw the interview. A lot of people will believe his lies and his self-serving excuse-making, and they'll vote accordingly.

What would have been more satisfying than Wallace ordering Clinton off the set -- when Clinton leaned back and shut up -- if Wallace had asked, "During the 9-11 Commission hearings, what documents did Sandy Berger remove from the archives? With what documents did he replace them, and did he do this at your or your representatives' bidding?"

They still fear this psychopath.


1,130 posted on 09/24/2006 3:48:13 PM PDT by Barset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: maica

Oh, I do hope you are wrong about that.

Brit is the totally sane, father figure of the news.

The sort of guy Cronkite pretended to be, but wasn't.


1,131 posted on 09/24/2006 3:48:27 PM PDT by altura (Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Clearly there is something going on under the radar that has the Dems nervous. It doesn't make sense they would be so defensive given the top news items of the week: 1. A Senate report that said Saddam and Al Qaeda didn't have any connections and 2. the DODIG report that said Able Danger didn't identify no stinking 9/11 terrorists. While, IMO, they were nothing more that poorly sourced, poorly written political documents, they nevertheless should have provided the Dems the standard talking point answer for all things related to the GWOT. They didn't. I wonder why.

Perhaps it has something to do with the under reported raid on the Moslem charity offices and home of one of its principles. One of those charities has already been implicated in the Oil for Food scam and was a heavy contributor to many Democrats. One donation to someone, whose name I cannot remember, had to be returned because of the timing relative to a trip or vote or something. I can't recall.

It seems to me that Democrat opposition to Iraq ramped up shortly after it was disclosed that the US had captured all those documents. IMO, there is a fear that these charities are as meticulous record keepers as Saddam was.

The Dems continue to be in a race against time. They must regain control of Congress before the light of freedom is shed on Saddam's Iraq. They must defund the initiates that continue to connect dots; that peels away the layers of deception and obfuscation that hide someone(s) complicity in Saddam's reign of terror.

1,132 posted on 09/24/2006 3:48:35 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Do you watch Tiki Tuesdays on Fox. It's pretty early but he's such fun to watch.


1,133 posted on 09/24/2006 3:50:34 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1124 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
then I predict the break up of the Democrat party as we know it.

I agree. I believe we saw the end of Democrats as we know them when they could not stop Alito's nomination, a loss this year will etch that in stone.

The fight between the Moveon wing and the DLC wing of the Dem party is going to resemble Hamas vs. PLO with the loser being the party.

1,134 posted on 09/24/2006 3:51:09 PM PDT by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1121 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Well, he gets taken down a peg by his short in stature, shrewish wife all the time. He must know to not show his teeth to her Heiness because they don't look like false teeth.


1,135 posted on 09/24/2006 3:52:51 PM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1100 | View Replies]

To: snugs
Good afternoon Snugs, or is it evening in your case? I've been away from the thread and now trying to catch up with the 1100 + posts. Wow! WJC was a bit chafed with Mr. Wallace.

Hope all is well in your corner of the world. My corner is a bit hectic, but should slow down a bit soon. It's all good though.

:)

1,136 posted on 09/24/2006 3:53:25 PM PDT by Chuck54 ( "Your right to privacy is not as important as my right to live".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: JerseyDvl

I like the scene where Jules call Butch... punchy. He didn't know whether to sh*t or go blind.


1,137 posted on 09/24/2006 3:55:27 PM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1120 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

When I'm up that early .. I love watching him on FnF .. he and Brian are a good pair in that segment.


1,138 posted on 09/24/2006 3:57:04 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

That might be true, I always felt that Cavuto would run the new Channel. Maybe Kim Hume is going to take it easy and do consulting,she certainly has the credentials. I sense that the more Liberal Members of the Murdoch clan may have something to do with this,however it comes at a good time for Fox and a 10 Year Anniversary Celebration. The Fox Panel behavior today was very unusual,too polite,too much like they were walking on eggs.


1,139 posted on 09/24/2006 3:58:46 PM PDT by samantha (cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1103 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

The chances of a DemocRat saying anything negative about BJ is less than the possibility of a Mooselip saying something negative about Mohamhead!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


1,140 posted on 09/24/2006 3:59:07 PM PDT by bray (Voting for the Rats is a Deathwish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,101-1,1201,121-1,1401,141-1,160 ... 1,321-1,328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson