To: Phsstpok
Clearly there is something going on under the radar that has the Dems nervous. It doesn't make sense they would be so defensive given the top news items of the week: 1. A Senate report that said Saddam and Al Qaeda didn't have any connections and 2. the DODIG report that said Able Danger didn't identify no stinking 9/11 terrorists. While, IMO, they were nothing more that poorly sourced, poorly written political documents, they nevertheless should have provided the Dems the standard talking point answer for all things related to the GWOT. They didn't. I wonder why.
Perhaps it has something to do with the under reported raid on the Moslem charity offices and home of one of its principles. One of those charities has already been implicated in the Oil for Food scam and was a heavy contributor to many Democrats. One donation to someone, whose name I cannot remember, had to be returned because of the timing relative to a trip or vote or something. I can't recall.
It seems to me that Democrat opposition to Iraq ramped up shortly after it was disclosed that the US had captured all those documents. IMO, there is a fear that these charities are as meticulous record keepers as Saddam was.
The Dems continue to be in a race against time. They must regain control of Congress before the light of freedom is shed on Saddam's Iraq. They must defund the initiates that continue to connect dots; that peels away the layers of deception and obfuscation that hide someone(s) complicity in Saddam's reign of terror.
1,132 posted on
09/24/2006 3:48:35 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: gov_bean_ counter
I believe you may be right. The Dems act like Clinton did in this interview, pure crazy. The DBM is also throwing all the crappola against the Pubbies,Conservatives, and GWB, and suicidal support for the Rats in the hopes that they can in a last ditch effort win back the power for the Rats. They are so desperate they continue to tick off their readers,and Television Audience that know they are covering for the Dems. They think just one more Election Cycle and they can handle all the loss of Circulation,Revenue,reputation,Stock Value,Ratings,and past History of Fairness. They are so wrong, but you cannot tell Pinch,Punch,or Puke Sulzburger how stupid and shortsighted they are behaving.
1,177 posted on
09/24/2006 4:25:38 PM PDT by
samantha
(cheer up, the Adults are in charge,but need Reserves really fast)
To: gov_bean_ counter
It seems to me that Democrat opposition to Iraq ramped up shortly after it was disclosed that the US had captured all those documents. You have a point - many of the Libs/Lefties/RATs say they supported going into Afghanistan, but you cannot find a single one that agrees with Iraq, and they yammer on daily about how Iraq is Bush's Viet Nam. They can only hope and wish for another Watergate, since all they have is that old playbook from the '60s.
1,259 posted on
09/24/2006 8:12:09 PM PDT by
AZConser
(Tancredo For President)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson