Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reality setting in on real estate
GlobalMacroScope ^ | September 2006 | Max Fraad Wolff

Posted on 09/23/2006 9:38:39 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

Reality setting in on real estate

September 2006

American’s castles (homes) are middle class walls of separation from poverty and want. As goes the house goes the family’s ability to fend off tough times and leverage past wealth for opportunity. Borrowing to bridge low income periods, college costs, medical expenses, bail, renovations, retirement and unemployment are all common. This is the proper frame of discussion for the impending debt/depreciation storming of the castle. A few basic facts are worth repeating. $1.06 Trillion in residential mortgages were written in 2005. Nearly 70% of Americans own their residences. The home is by far the largest asset “owned” by the bottom 80% of citizens. For the last 10 years, and particularly the last 6, things have gotten pretty darn wild in the real estate world. Perhaps unreal estate would be a better phrase?

Housing prices, refinancing, building and improvement, buying and fixation have mushroomed. Many have made significant gains in home asset value- at least on paper. There is no longer debate that things have gone way beyond anything that might be sustained. Such debates are silly and are better handled by psychologists and psychiatrists than economists. As a member of the latter, I will defer to those equipped to comment from real knowledge and experience.

The coming return to earth will be uneven, disorderly and proceed in fits and starts. This we know from past episodes and our extensive and growing experience with bubbles- the new engine of the American Macroeconomy. The housing troubles ahead are serious and this is largely symptomatic of the greater shake-out in progress. A significant portion of the middle class is no more. Housing is about to turn onto another serious problem for these beset masses. It will join health coverage and cost, pension woes, massive debt, intergenerational demands and stagnant wages. All of these afflictions are related and interacting. Wages have not kept-up, health care costs run several times the rate of inflation, and college tuitions soar. Aging parents require help with medical costs, children cost more and their early career wages don’t come close to supporting a middle class existence. Thus, longer and more expensive support is often required. There are no savings and pensions are shaky. Rising house prices were a godsend to many- financially and psychically. This will soon run contrary.

Housing appreciation has been the lender of first and last resort to millions of families. Refinancing, cash out or interest rate lowering, has paid for more than meager gains in wages- even after some very modest tax relief. After tax income gain, skewed up by salary scales and taxation changes, was about $375 billion in 2005. Depending on which estimate you accept; approximately $550 billion was extracted through cash out refinancing. It is clear that housing appreciation has become the crutch for many limping families. Rising home prices- unsustainably above trend and already decelerating- have been an essential enabler of bill paying and consumption. Housing appreciation thus, did more for American families last year than wage and salary increases. This is set to reverse. Mortgage News Daily has recently reported an ominous sign of desperation:

During the first quarter the median ratio of old-to-new interest rates was 0.98 which means that one half of borrowers who were refinancing mortgages ended up with a new loan with a rate that was two percent higher than the old rate.[1]

Thus, refinancing is clearly driven by the need for cash from appreciated housing more than rate changes - which should be discouraging. Such refinancing reached record levels across the first quarters of 2006 and accounted for just under half of the mortgages owned by Freddie Mac. 17 consecutive interest rate hikes were no much for the needs and wants of home owners.

Financial firms and employment have been massively assisted by the housing bubble. They are vulnerable to price stagnation and decline. The most recent FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile, while upbeat, offers some remarkable numbers. Across Q4 2005 residential home equity lines and mortgages accounted for 38% of new loans and leases.[2] This simply states that families and financial institutions are dependent on housing price gains. Households also gained - many directly and some indirectly - from the employment generated by housing. Across the early years of the post equity market meltdown (2001-2004), housing and related sectors accounted for over 40% of US private sector payroll growth. Since rate hikes began to effect markets, housing and related sectors have tumbled to account for less than 15% of private sector payroll growth. This is an ominous trend. As housing has cooled new jobs creation has cooled in tandem.

The fragility and risk associated with housing gains is very serious. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a housing price index (HPI) for every quarter. In the 21 most recent quarters (Q12001-Q12006), the mean annual increase measured each quarter was 9.32%. In the 21 proceeding quarters the mean quarterly increase was 4.8%. Thus, as economic growth and labor earnings growth cooled, housing price appreciation rates doubled. In the last 5 years the average house has increased in price by 57%. Over the same period real GDP growth was 15%. The most optimistic White House Estimate of real after tax compensation increased by 8%.[3] Unreal estate price increases are just that. Brace yourself for a dose of reality that will fall heavy on the shoulders of those least able to bare the load.

Here the risks are extreme and the potentially impacted group is large enough to have macro significance. ACORN, a community advocacy group released, The Impending Rate Shock, on August 15, 2006. This report examines 130 metro areas and offers a first glimpse at the extent of risk and fragility of housing finance for lower income Americans. In 2005 adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) accounted for 24% of all residential loans and 75% of sub-prime loans. One million households have either received sub-prime loans or are at risk of foreclosure from mortgage burden. The average sub-prime ARM term to adjustment is 2 years and the base rate is the London Inter-bank Offer Rate (LIBOR) with added charges often equaling 5%. As of today LIBOR is 5.40%. The short adjustment horizon of sub-prime ARM means that many face dramatic upward readjustment soon. This will produce difficulty paying, increased default and lost purchasing power in affected communities. In short, housing wealth effects are in the process of resetting to run in reverse. Clearly this will occur sooner and more extensively in some places than others. This will last several years and be more than large enough to have negative macro effects on a par with the positive effects that we have seen across this long boom- now over!

We believe a pronounced housing slowdown will be followed by localized absolute declines in mean residence price. Given the exaggerated macro benefit that robust housing appreciation, refinance and associated activity have had, we are looking for a virtuous cycle to turn vicious with national and international implications. Low and middle income Americans will have to cut back on all forms of discretionary spending. The coming drastic reduction in purchasing of exports by suffering members of middle class- and soon to be former middle class Americans- will have global impact. Those who earn their keep producing and distributing to these masses will share in the pain as consumption spending is ratcheted down to levels at which America's families can service debts and stay within modest and pressured incomes.

What is good for housing may have been good for America. Likewise we fear the return of reality to real estate will exert a pronounced downward pull on national economic performance and have global economy implications.

(Max Fraad Wolff is a Doctoral Candidate in Economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst and editor of the website GlobalMacroScope.)

[1] mortgagenewsdaily.com/532006_Mortgage_Rates.asp

[2] FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile (http://www2.fdic.gov/qbp/index.asp).

[3] www.whitehouse.gov/cea/lazear20060502.html


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bubblebrigade; depression; despair; doom; dustbowl; eeyore; grapesofwrath; housing; joebtfsplk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last
To: A CA Guy

So in other words no... and he has a resume that somewhat resembles Lincoln in the early success category. BFD.


121 posted on 09/23/2006 5:49:22 PM PDT by rwilson99 (95% of Al-Jazzera Viewers Agree... the world is less safe (for them) since 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

My mother was telling me today about a condo-conversion open house she visited in the DC suburbs. She ran the numbers on it, and for a 2 bed, 2 bath w/$600 in condo fees each month, taxes, etc. = $3500 a month; $10,000 extra if you need another parking space.

And she wonders why I'm headed to Iowa...


122 posted on 09/23/2006 5:57:52 PM PDT by radiohead (Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking, guts you coward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Yup, rates are going thru the roof. For instance, the 10 year US Treasury. 4.6%. We're doomed!

123 posted on 09/23/2006 6:38:55 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Not sure if it's considered "docyumented" but Robert Kiyosaki is listed on a couple of sites as having filed forbankruptcy.


http://www.nndb.com/event/146/000048999/


124 posted on 09/23/2006 6:52:21 PM PDT by stylin19a (I'm not just long, I'm Lama long !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Rents on a house, anywhere in CA is at a minimum 1000 and on average 1400 dollars.

Beg to differ on this one; I live in Arcadia/Monrovia/Duarte/Bradbury area and the median rent fee for an apartment mind you is upward of $2500.00 (2 Bedrooms, 2 Bath, Pool, Security etc/pp).
Need I talk about San Marino, South Pasadena...

125 posted on 09/23/2006 6:54:53 PM PDT by danmar (Tomorrow's life is too late. Live today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Even the site you used states the bankuptcy was unproven.

Funny thing is... he even has a doom and gloom book out now too.


126 posted on 09/23/2006 6:58:19 PM PDT by rwilson99 (95% of Al-Jazzera Viewers Agree... the world is less safe (for them) since 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner
Highly desirable locations do not necessarily mean you are immune from a real estate bust. Look what happened to median home prices in the LA, Orange County, Riverside and San Diego counties from 1989 to 1996/97:

http://www.laalmanac.com/economy/ec37.htm
127 posted on 09/23/2006 7:03:13 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

You're cherry picking again, Toddler. 10-year yields have been rising for the last several years:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5ETNX&t=5y&l=on&z=m&q=l&c=


128 posted on 09/23/2006 7:14:32 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Even though he's a back door Marine, I kinda like the guy...in an Elmer Gantry, Bill Clinton sort of way.


129 posted on 09/23/2006 7:24:37 PM PDT by stylin19a (I'm not just long, I'm Lama long !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
A little reality is a good thing. I hope people will avoid getting themselves too far into debt in the future when trying to buy a home. It is tough finding a first home when the income is lower.

The biggest problem is that young couples come into marriage these days expecting a home and a lifestyle to which their parents have gotten them accustomed, forgetting that it took their parents MANY years to get to that point. They also purchase a home that requires two incomes to maintain forgetting that many things can happen that can disrupt that picture; pregnancy and childbirth taking the woman out of the workforce for several weeks or months, or sickness or disability of either the husband or wife.

130 posted on 09/23/2006 7:29:35 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Ouch. And they say RE can't decline in the so-called "desirable" neighborhoods!
131 posted on 09/23/2006 8:07:08 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Geez. This guy cites ACORN as a source, one of the most lefty groups I know of from my time in the big city.

Woe is us. The sky is falling!


132 posted on 09/23/2006 8:20:35 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: osideplanner

The shift key is there for capitol letters you idiot.


133 posted on 09/23/2006 8:20:44 PM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

Have you checked home prices in Eureka lately? Did you sell too soon?


134 posted on 09/23/2006 8:32:13 PM PDT by tubebender (Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
10-year yields have been rising for the last several years:

Obviously. They rose all the way to 4.6% on Friday.


135 posted on 09/23/2006 9:01:42 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Last I checked, in CA, public employees, teachers, police, and firefighters make between 50-70 grand a year (sometimes more). Nurses nearly 100,000 grand. Most low level jobs start at 8-10 dollars per hour. Rents on a house, anywhere in CA is at a minimum 1000 and on average 1400 dollars. What is it about CA the rest of the nation doesn't understand? Is it so bad out in the East that they no longer teach mathematics?"""

What's your point? Are you saying life is good, and well-paid in CA? Or are you pointing out, to the contrary, that taxes are astronomical in order to pay those high public employee salaries and benefits that you cite. Because of the high taxes (and even with them, the government isn't taking in enough to meet its generous promises to public workers), the private sector middle class is being ground down in California. Are you celebrating these trends, or bemoaning them? Again, I'm not sure about the point of your post.

136 posted on 09/23/2006 9:17:20 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Hmmm...things are looking pretty good for gold and silver:

http://www.jsmineset.com/cwsimages/Miscfiles/3444_Charts220906-1.pdf

The PPT may try to stabilize the USD until the elections. But it looks to me like the gold shorts and the dollar longs are about to get slaughtered:

http://www.jsmineset.com/cwsimages/Miscfiles/3445_Charts_for_09-22-2006.pdf
137 posted on 09/23/2006 10:37:23 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Hmmm...things are looking pretty good for gold and silver:

Then why are you reducing your position?

The PPT may try to stabilize the USD until the elections.

LOL! Did the PPT make gold go down?

But it looks to me like the gold shorts and the dollar longs are about to get slaughtered:

You should put more gold on your credit cards. And margin to the hilt!

138 posted on 09/23/2006 10:49:02 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Goldbugs, immune to logic and allergic to facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

similar to my house in Alabam, I have the same stove....1957 vintage I think. I did replace the RED linoleum in mine though. I bought 1500sqft for $53k give or take, and now its worth $65k if I spent $2k paintin and (new stove). The 80 year old pecan tree is free. California still seems to suck from here.


139 posted on 09/23/2006 11:00:55 PM PDT by Phil Southern (Dirt is for growin' taters, asphault is for racin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Already did. Picked up 7 more bars at the mid 570s. I have encountered your type (even amongst my friends and relatives) year after year. But the gold market has silenced each and every one of them in their turn. Actually, that's not quite correct. Several of my biggest detractors did a complete 180 and have been making money off gold for a couple of years now. I would love to meet up with you at one of our many get-togethers so we could all go through your silly posts and laugh at how you cut off your own nose to spite your face.
140 posted on 09/23/2006 11:09:08 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson