Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan Surrenders; The Taliban control the border with Afghanistan.
The Weekly Standard ^ | 10/02/2006, Volume 012, Issue 03 | Daveed Gartenstein-Ross & Bill Roggio

Posted on 09/23/2006 5:34:27 AM PDT by dynoman

INTELLIGENCE ANALYSTS woke up on September 5 to unsettling news. The government of Pakistan, they learned, had entered into a peace agreement with the Taliban insurgency that essentially cedes authority in North Waziristan, the mountainous tribal region bordering Afghanistan, to the Taliban and al Qaeda. Just ten days later, the blow was compounded when the government of Pakistan released a large number of jihadists from prison. Together, these events may constitute the most significant development in the global war on terror in the past year--yet the media have taken little notice.

For four years, the Pakistani military engaged in a campaign to assert governmental control over Wazir istan. The cost to Pakistan has been considerable; some intelligence sources believe this fighting has exacted a higher death toll on the Pakistani military than U.S. forces have sustained in Iraq. It is in this context that Pakistan gave up on South Waziristan last spring, abandoning its effort to control that area. Thereafter, sharia law was declared in South Waziristan, and the Taliban began to rule openly.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; alqaeda; demarche; musharraf; nato; pakistan; reverse; taliban; waronterror; waziristan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
More at link.

I wonder if this will allow the coalition more freedom to operate in that region.

1 posted on 09/23/2006 5:34:28 AM PDT by dynoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynoman
At worst, Pakistan may actively defend the tribal regions. I suspect they're just going to withdraw from the area, giving the Taliban a sanctuary. This has already changed the war for the worse in Afghanistan. We can hold what we have, but the only way to stop tribals in the Northwest Frontier Provinces is to kill them all, and we can't do that.
2 posted on 09/23/2006 5:39:18 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

That is indeed the reason according to the "scuttlebutt".

LLS


3 posted on 09/23/2006 5:39:57 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

I believe that a case of ebola in this region would probably solve a lot of problems.


4 posted on 09/23/2006 5:41:09 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Freedom by its nature cannot be imposed, it must be chosen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
I wonder if this will allow the coalition more freedom to operate in that region.

Well, if there are no Pakistani troops in the region, then that takes care of the risk of accidentally plugging them. And makes for fewer witnesses. Sounds good to me.

5 posted on 09/23/2006 5:41:30 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Wonder if this explains the French report on UBL's alleged demise....


6 posted on 09/23/2006 5:42:10 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynoman; ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; ...
I wonder if this will allow the coalition more freedom to operate in that region.

It all depends on good will of Iran. The core of anti-Taleban forces is Northern Alliance sponsored by Iran (and to some extent by Russia). It was the Northern Alliance which provided the bulk of anti-Taleban forces to help US intervention.

7 posted on 09/23/2006 5:42:15 AM PDT by A. Pole (Rumsfeld:"In politics, every day is filled with numerous opportunities for serious error. Enjoy it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955
My question about the "autonomous" territories has always been, if the Pakistanis can't control it why do we honor Pakistani sovereignty? I would think free fire zone would be a more apt description.
8 posted on 09/23/2006 5:45:20 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

This agreement would make them bold.

Let them regroup thinking they are getting away with it, then hammer them, let them regroupthinking they are getting away with it, them hammer them, etc. etc.

It is the senario that makes sense, in fact in this light even the release of the 2500 makes some sense, watch where they go.


9 posted on 09/23/2006 5:46:05 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

Musharef feels pretty secure in his present position, traveling to NY and doing a book deal, appearing in a joint news conference with the President. That doesn't sound like he is cowering in fear of the Taliban.


10 posted on 09/23/2006 5:46:27 AM PDT by mission9 (Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mission9

What % of war is deception??


11 posted on 09/23/2006 5:48:02 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
Would the introduction of Californian Organic Spinach be considered Biological Warfare?
12 posted on 09/23/2006 5:50:38 AM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
It's pretty mountainous and not conducive to large-unit tactics. Instead, we need to send in A and B teams to hunt and kill the terrorists. This is a time to pull out the Selous Scouts playbook and turn some of the Taliban.
13 posted on 09/23/2006 5:51:59 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

"My question about the "autonomous" territories has always been, if the Pakistanis can't control it why do we honor Pakistani sovereignty? I would think free fire zone would be a more apt description."

I guess to give the Pakis a chance to reclaim the area, that they have obviously failed at.


14 posted on 09/23/2006 5:52:20 AM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neb52

No. It's Liberal Foolishness.


15 posted on 09/23/2006 5:53:03 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

What % of war is deception??

If I told you, it would be a wrong figure.


16 posted on 09/23/2006 5:54:03 AM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

Are you suggesting that his new book is full of lies? I am shocked, shocked that GAMBLING is going on in this Casino.


17 posted on 09/23/2006 5:55:40 AM PDT by mission9 (Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
More Info
18 posted on 09/23/2006 6:00:34 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
And also a high level funeral...And a Musharif book deal, which will be released soon..."2+2+2+2=8"
19 posted on 09/23/2006 6:10:48 AM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
From near the end of this piece:

It seems that at this point nobody in the U.S. government knows how to deal with the situation in Pakistan. Some routine suggestions have been peddled: covert operations, pressure on the Musharraf government, and the like. Some in the State Department have even publicly defended the Wazir istan Accord, while at a Friday press conference with President Bush, Musharraf stated, "The deal is not at all with the Taliban. This deal is against the Taliban. The deal is with the tribal elders." To this, President Bush replied, "I believe him."

20 posted on 09/23/2006 6:13:36 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson