Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why liberals love adultery
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, September 22, 2006 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 09/23/2006 12:54:12 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Liberals are always cheering for the wrong people.

Have you ever noticed?

In our war on Islamo-fascism, they ask America to withdraw. When Hugo Chavez smells sulfur at the United Nations, liberal Democratic senators "understand" him (i.e., Tom Harkin). But no one is a liberal's hero the way an adulterer is.

You would think in a world shaped by modern liberal feminists that liberal media types and liberal politicians would be rushing to the aid of the poor wife and kids, offering them welfare and state-funded counseling and beating the offending man to within an inch of his life. But not so.

(Column continues below)

The original love affair with adultery happened with the former president who to this day cannot be offered a cigar without a range of comments flooding through people's minds. Yet by comparison, William Jefferson Clinton's adultery was a little bland, even unimpressive by the new superhero, extra-marital fornicators of our time.

Who are they? Men who engage in same-gender sexual activities!

This is why Bishop Eugene Robinson of the now nearly defunct Episcopal Church is revered by those on the political left. "He was true to himself," they say with almost breathless whisper, as if this act of discovering his belly button was some form of epic courage.

Forget the fact that he has ruined an entire denomination of Christian faith; the fact that he can go home at night and engage in sick sexual perversion makes him a legend amongst the political left.

But now there's a new kid on the scene. Having done all he could to ruin the state of New Jersey – a state he took a solemn oath to protect and serve – the new adulterer liberals all love is Jim McGreevey. Just in the last week alone he's held hands with Oprah and shared New Jersey rest-area secrets with Matt Lauer.

He's also invoked God's name about 300 times.

And now he says, "It's all about telling the truth."

But I'd like to know, "Since when?"

It wasn't important enough for the governor to keep his pants zipped after pledging to do so before God and man ... with his wife – twice!

There was no commitment to "telling the truth" or "confessing" (a reference to the poorly titled book the ex-governor is now pimping) when he's arriving home from the busy day in Trenton and telling his wife and child everything but the truth – only then to whisk himself away under the late night guise of more work to go have an anonymous tryst with psychopaths along turnpike hide-a-ways.

Enough!

There is no need to tell us about the prayer cards you read before you made your big press conference announcing your resignation.

While Oprah, Lauer, McGreevey and the throngs of Democrats who "support" him may be holding hands singing "Kumbayah," some adult needs to come along and ask a few serious questions.

Questions like why should you be praised for your "honesty" now when you were putting sexual pleasure ahead of the security of the state you served? Who can trust you after you named a lover to the post of homeland security czar who was neither an American citizen, nor was qualified to even attend homeland security meetings?

But what about the deeper questions that no one ever asks these jokers?

Robinson, McGreevey and even Clinton to a certain degree became sympathetic figures because of this "true to your self" mantra. But in the grown-up world, don't we try to instruct our boys that the definition of a hero is someone who overcomes his own natural fears to accomplish more and be more and do more than they think is possible? Isn't it good to teach our young men that when they enter into a marriage they should strive to be their family's superhero?

Isn't it a healthy thing for a father to leave the home in the morning thinking, "I'm going to go slay the dragons of this world so that my family and the sacredness of my home won't be victimized by the evil in the world"?

One of McGreevey's actual excuses, as relayed on Lauer's interview, was to mention that his parents were not role models for him because they themselves did not engage in homosexual activity.

Is he listening to himself? Did he want them to?

If they had, he would not even be here!

In the whole spin cycle of garbage about sexual behavior and why we're "made a certain way" we forget that choices are made for every single action taken. With Clinton, the issue was "come on, every body does it." With Robinson and McGreevey, it's simply, "I'm being true to myself."

In truth, it's selfishness coupled with the refusal to curb their sexual appetite. It's the refusal to make the choice not to be a slave to their impulses. Basically, they are still little boys who do not know how to discipline themselves – only now they wish the world to feel sorry for them. And in McGreevey's case, he's openly seeking to work with kids for his life's mission now.

Uh, no thank you!

I don't understand the attraction, but one thing is true: Liberals love adulterers.

And today, if you break your vows of commitment to your wife and children, abandon them and get kinky with rest-stop lowlife, while simultaneously endangering a populous state in the midst of a war on terror, you're a rock star!

McCullough is heard daily in New York City, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware on WMCA 570 at 2 p.m., and he blogs at muscleheadrevolution.com.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: adultery; democrats; godless; kevinmccullough; liberals; mcgreevey; moralabsolutes

1 posted on 09/23/2006 12:54:13 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

bump good article.


2 posted on 09/23/2006 1:02:32 AM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

'When Hugo Chavez smells sulfur at the United Nations, liberal Democratic senators "understand" him'

He who smelt it dealt it.


3 posted on 09/23/2006 1:09:18 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I have recently concluded that hardcore liberals love anything that displeases God.


4 posted on 09/23/2006 1:10:52 AM PDT by volunbeer (Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
One of McGreevey's actual excuses, as relayed on Lauer's interview, was to mention that his parents were not role models for him because they themselves did not engage in homosexual activity.

Wow. That does not even make any sense. The left really champions insane people, especially if they are in positions of power.

5 posted on 09/23/2006 2:36:27 AM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
..."I have recently concluded that hardcore liberals love anything that displeases God"...

And God is not going to remain silent for very much longer..This I believe..Women and children are harmed when all kinds of sexual passions are unleashed to be expressed in whatever form the perversion dictates. Not that many years ago, if a man committed adultery without his wife's knowledge, he paid a price through the unwritten rules of his society..Today it seems to be the opposite..The most decadent acts command the greatest protection and attention. We can thank Hollywood for much of this..How many films have you seen where a man and his wife were in love and keeping only to one another? Excitement seems to be created only when someone is betrayed..
I doubt that Mr. McGreevey will continue to lead a "charmed" life. I feel very sorry for his family, especially his parents.
6 posted on 09/23/2006 3:45:52 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer
I have recently concluded that hardcore liberals love anything that displeases God.

I have arrived there as well. Also, I have figured out that they have a deep hatred for those they claim to be trying to help.

7 posted on 09/23/2006 5:33:37 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (The truth shall make you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
One of McGreevey's actual excuses, as relayed on Lauer's interview, was to mention that his parents were not role models for him because they themselves did not engage in homosexual activity.

The "living, breathing" mantra is shown with this idiotic statement.

8 posted on 09/23/2006 6:08:59 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What an honorable man that McGreevey is. While his wife was in the hospital giving birth to their baby, McGreevey was having gay sex at home in their bed.
9 posted on 09/23/2006 6:53:42 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
One of the things our current President hated about the sixties & seventies was how collective guilt replaced individual responsibility. Clinton, on the other hand......

This is a perfect example. When adultery is mentioned we hear excuses about how everyone is doing it. Instead of blaming the participants, the institution of marriage was blamed. In Clinton's case, his defenders used the fact that lying goes hand in hand with adultery was used to excuse the lying rather than to show how it compounds the problem. In that case, lying about adultery led to purgery and obstruction of justice.

10 posted on 09/23/2006 8:49:22 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

Kind of like Maxine Waters saying that she has to march for a woman's right for an abortion since her mother couldn't have one!!!


11 posted on 09/23/2006 9:41:09 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

That explains a lot about my Ex!


12 posted on 09/23/2006 9:42:29 AM PDT by airborne (Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzlite
Excitement seems to be created only when someone is betrayed..

And when that's no longer shocking, they must move to an ever-baser level to keep up that "excitement". Hollywood portrayals of the once-unthinkable are now common as houseflies.

13 posted on 09/23/2006 9:44:55 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

"In truth, it's selfishness coupled with the refusal to curb their sexual appetite. It's the refusal to make the choice not to be a slave to their impulses. Basically, they are still little boys who do not know how to discipline themselves – only now they wish the world to feel sorry for them. And in McGreevey's case, he's openly seeking to work with kids for his life's mission now.

Uh, no thank you!

I don't understand the attraction, but one thing is true: Liberals love adulterers.

And today, if you break your vows of commitment to your wife and children, abandon them and get kinky with rest-stop lowlife, while simultaneously endangering a populous state in the midst of a war on terror, you're a rock star! "


14 posted on 09/23/2006 1:44:49 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul

McGreevey made sure he not only screwed up one wife and kid,
but went on and had another wife and kid. Then again, it always was all about him.


15 posted on 09/23/2006 4:55:09 PM PDT by Tessarie (Europe's brains immigrated to America 100 years ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
(i.e. Tom Harkin)

Jim McGreevey. Just in the last week alone he's held hands with Oprah, and shared New Jersey rest area secrets with Matt Lauer.

16 posted on 09/24/2006 6:01:00 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Liberals are God, so anything that displeases them, is subject to change.


17 posted on 09/27/2006 12:31:31 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kylaka

"""Liberals are God, so anything that displeases them, is subject to change."""

I suppose if one has no higher authority than one's own self that would be logical. I think Coulter nailed that pretty well in her recent book.

It is sad (just like Brokeback Mountain) that the wife and child(ren) never get a mention from those who treat this story like hearing a wounded vet who has returned home to rehab. These are men who abandoned their responsibilities for lust (just like Clinton) and they are celebrated by some. Go figure!


18 posted on 09/27/2006 1:43:25 PM PDT by volunbeer (Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson