Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North America confab 'undermines' democracy
WorldNetDaily ^ | September 21, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 09/22/2006 2:14:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A closed-door meeting of high-level government and business leaders that discussed the merger of North America was designed to subvert the democratic process, charged an attendee of the confab in Banff, Canada.

Mel Hurtig, a noted Canadian author and publisher who was the elected leader of the National Party of Canada, provided WND the agenda and attendee list of the North American Forum at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Sept. 12-14.

Hurtig said the "secret meeting was designed to undermine the democratic process."

"What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries," he said. "It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye."

As WND reported yesterday, the meeting was closed to the press, and the documents obtained by WND were marked "Internal Document, Not for Public Release."

The motive for U.S. participation, according to Hurtig, was "to gain access and control Canada's extensive natural resources, including oil and water."

As for Canada, he said, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives "wants to make sure that the 150 Canadian top companies who are their members who gain access to the American market and to American capital."

The office of Thomas d'Aquino, president and CEO of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, confirmed d'Aquino attend the Banff meeting.

The North American Forum consists of the three individuals who co-chaired the Banff meeting: George Schultz, former secretary of state under President Reagan; Canadian Peter Lougheed, the former Alberta premier and former leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta; and Mexico's Pedro Aspe, the former secretary of the Treasury of Mexico.

The North American Forum has no business office and no business address. Attendees at the Banff meeting contributed funds to cover the organizational expenses. Attendees, including government officials, were responsible for their own travel, lodging and per diem expenses.

A spokesman for the Canadian Council of Chief Executives said the Council of Canadians, which he characterized as a "far left group," was the first to obtain and begin circulating the meeting's agenda and attendee list.

Meera Karunananthan, spokeswoman for the Council of Canadians confirmed to WND the group was responsible for obtaining and releasing the meeting agenda and attendee list. She took exception with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, preferring to characterize her organization as "a citizens' advocacy group."

Karunananthan said the Council of Canadians released the North American Forum information because it questions the "privacy of a meeting that involves senior ministers of our government meeting with senior government officials in the United States and Mexico."

"The Canadian public has not been adequately informed about the on-going North American integration process, and we believe it is wrong for a meeting that involves top North American business executives and government officials to be held in secret behind closed doors," she said.

Jean-Yzes LeFort, also a spokesman for the Council of Canadians, told WND the group opposes the effort to create a North American Union because "the NAU represents an elite corporate agenda and to us what is being planned would be an unacceptable loss of sovereignty."

Attending the Banff meeting was Robert Pastor, the director of the Center for North American Studies at American University. Pastor is widely known for his extensive writings arguing for the creation of a North American Union, a new super-regional North American government based on the model of the European Union, with the intent of subrogating the sovereignty of the United States.

Pastor was co-chair of the Council of Foreign Relations task force that in May 2005 released a report entitled "Building a North American Community."

About one-third of the listed members of CFR task force attended the Banff conference. One prominent participant in both was Carla A. Hills, who served as U.S. trade representative from 1989 to 1993 and was the primary U.S. negotiator for NAFTA.

On the second day of the conference, a session entitled "A Vision for North America: Issues & Options" was moderated by Thomas A. Shannon, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs.

Perrin Beatty, president and CEO of Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters, Canada's largest trade and industry association, also confirmed to WND he attended the Banff North American Forum meeting. Beatty described the meeting as "an opportunity for a small group of people from our three North American countries to get together informally and discuss issues of common interest."

When asked why the meeting was closed to the press, Beatty responded the meeting was not a "decision forum" but a "discussion forum."

Beatty claimed Pastor's views were not universally shared by all attendees.

"My interest in attending the meeting was economic," he told WND. "How do we insure we keep pace with the explosion in competition in the North American industry? It's absolutely critical to the economic growth of our three countries that we stay competitive and successful."

Among the U.S. government participants listed was Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, though WND was told he did not attend. Also listed were U.S. Department of Defense Lt. General Gene Renuart, USAF Senior Military Assistant to Secretary Rumsfeld, and Major Gen. Mark A. Volcheff, director of Plans, Policy, and Strategy for NORAD-NORTHCAM.

In what is apparently intended to be an annual event, the first North American Forum meeting was held last September in Sonoma, Calif., and a meeting for next September is to be held in Mexico.

Related offers:

For a comprehensive look at the U.S. government's plan to integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a North American super-state – guided by the powerful but secretive Council on Foreign Relations – read "ALIEN NATION: SECRETS OF THE INVASION," a special edition of WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine.

Get Tom Tancredo's new book, "In Mortal Danger," for just $4.95.

Related stories:

Attendance list North American forum

North American Forum agenda

Previous stories:

North American merger topic of secret confab

Feds finally release info on 'superstate'

Senator ditches bill tied to 'superstate'

Congressman presses on 'superstate' plan

Feds stonewalling on 'super state' plan?

Cornyn wants U.S. taxpayers to fund Mexican development

No EU in U.S.

Trans-Texas Corridor paved with campaign contributions?

U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies

More evidence of Mexican trucks coming to U.S.

Docs reveal plan for Mexican trucks in U.S.

Kansas City customs port considered Mexican soil?

Tancredo confronts 'superstate' effort

Bush sneaking North American superstate without oversight?

Related columns:

Coming soon to U.S.: Mexican customs office

Merger with Mexico


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: canada; cfr; councilofcanadians; cuespookymusic; democracy; freetrade; icecreammandrake; jeromecorsi; melhurtig; mexico; morethorazineplease; naf; nationalsovereignty; naturalresources; nau; northamericanforum; northamericanunion; preciousbodilyfluids; robertpastor; sapandimpurify; superstate; theboogeyman; unitedstates; usa; usna; worldnetdaily; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: 1rudeboy

Oh, brother...


61 posted on 09/23/2006 4:29:03 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Who is that idiot? Part of the Black Bloc (which, if I'm correct, is communist)?


62 posted on 09/23/2006 4:31:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Scary, but hardly unprecedented. We intervened in a much more forceful manner in Iraq.


63 posted on 09/23/2006 4:36:10 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Funny, isn't it? More poof that the fringe left and the fringe right are virtually indistinguishable in the U.S. (Please don't jump on me, I said "fringe.")


64 posted on 09/23/2006 4:36:10 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Has this charter actually been ratified by us?


65 posted on 09/23/2006 4:42:47 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; 1rudeboy; Unrepentant VN Vet; fanfan
Who?
The guy in the photo in my post #42?
If so, I'm not certain exactly what's his specific group affiliation is ... usually with most forms of parasites some sort of advanced scientific degree and a pretty powerful microscope are required for absolutely precise differentiation.

Suffice to say he's some type of subversive cadre outwardly opposed to capitalism & international trade yet secretly on the payroll of the very folks he claims to be against ... if our FRiend is to be believed.

It's my understanding the 'Black Bloc' claim to be anarchists but, as before, you'll need the advanced degree & big honkin' microscope.
66 posted on 09/23/2006 5:01:39 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Who?
The guy in the photo in my post #42?

That's the one.

67 posted on 09/23/2006 5:42:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; GMMAC
INTER-AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC CHARTER

Signed by all OAS members except Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and the Commonwealth of Dominica

The charter text was actually approved by the OAS Permanent Council yesterday, and it has been obviously referred for ratification by the foreign ministers at a Special General Assembly, which will be held in Lima September 10th and 11th. Secretary Powell will head the U.S. delegation.
Roger Francisco Noriega , Permanent Representative to the Organization of American States

Remarks on the First Anniversary of the Inter-American Democratic Charter the Organization of American States
The Honourable Barbara McDougall, September 16, 2002

The first step in this project was to convene a conference on the Charter at the University of British Columbia in November 2002, with financial support from the Human Security Program in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. From this conference there arose three recommendations: The creation of a virtual policy network to bring together experts and civil society to evaluation the Charter and its application; a research center to commission thematic and country reports to evaluate compliance with the Charter; and to convene a group of "Friends of the Charter," composed of former leaders, eminent persons, and distinguished experts to ensure the Charter is used in a flexible, proactive, and preventive manner.
Canadian political scientists evaluate compliance with the charter.
68 posted on 09/23/2006 8:55:10 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

This article seems a non-event.


69 posted on 09/23/2006 11:28:28 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; GMMAC

Just because some U.S. official was dumb enough to sign this accord doesn't mean that the U.S. Senate was dumb enough to ratify it. At least I hope the U.S. Senate wasn't dumb enough to ratify it (oh, who am I kidding?).


70 posted on 09/24/2006 7:17:50 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Exactly.
From what I hear, if America had actually gone along with even a sizable portion of the brain dead & outright treasonous nonsense which has floated around your State Department since WW2, it would likely now be a third world banana republic.

Have faith: seemingly a lot more people worldwide now see the U.S. was right to reject the Kyoto Accord than was the case a few years ago.
71 posted on 09/24/2006 7:34:21 PM PDT by GMMAC (Discover Canada governed by Conservatives: www.CanadianAlly.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson