Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We are long overdue to enact new laws to increase taxpayer protections and outlaw & repeal the income tax, --- with a fair and consumption-based tax.

Many conservatives on FR oppose such a tax.. Why?

1 posted on 09/20/2006 10:32:35 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: tpaine

I think property taxes need to be addressed first.


2 posted on 09/20/2006 10:35:25 AM PDT by southlake_hoosier (.... One Nation, Under God.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

Well obviously the kongress kritters are dragging their feet on it. I propose a tax revolt. Refuse to pay their damned taxes, and see how fast that they listen to the people then.


4 posted on 09/20/2006 10:39:27 AM PDT by Concho (IRS--Americas real terrorist organization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
Exactly why "we will never again be a FREE country so long as we have the income tax and the IRS"!

http://www.fairtax.org

6 posted on 09/20/2006 10:42:01 AM PDT by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
The requirement to file tax returns sworn to under penalty of perjury operates to invalidate the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination.

This was the one clinker in the list.

Fifth Amendment protections apply only to criminal cases. Almost all tax cases are civil cases (failure to pay a debt has always been considered a tort as opposed to a crime). One cannot be held to criminal court for an accurately filled-out tax form, even if the monies in question are the proceeds of illegal activities. (We actually had a case against a fence thrown out when I was a cop because we only his tax returns as evidence. D'OH!)

I have seen tax returns filled out by drug dealers, fences, and bookies. Some of them are actually pretty funny when it comes to "type of employment."

Drug dealer's employment: "Pharmaceutical Industry"

Fence: "Retail Goods."

Bookie: "Sports Forecasting & Consulting."

9 posted on 09/20/2006 10:49:31 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine; ancient_geezer; pigdog
ping time

Thanks tp.

10 posted on 09/20/2006 10:54:41 AM PDT by groanup (fairtax.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
A Taxreform ping for you all.

If anyone would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

 

"The simplest system of taxation yet adopted is that of levying on the land and the laborer. But it would be better to levy the same sums on the produce of that labor when collected in the barn of the farmer; because then if through the badness of the year he made little, he would pay little. It would be better yet to levy it only on the surplus of this produce above his own wants. It would be better, too, to levy it, not in his hands, but in those of the purchaser; because though the farmer would in fact pay it, as the purchaser must deduct it from the original price of his produce yet the farmer would not be sensible that he paid it... What a comfort to the farmer to be allowed to supply his own wants before he should be liable to pay anything, and then to pay only out of his surplus."
Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1784. Papers 7:558

 

John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25) offer a comprehensive bill to kill all federal income, SS/Medicare payroll, and gift/estate taxes outright replacing them with with a national retail sales tax administered by the states.

 

H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information:


15 posted on 09/20/2006 11:08:39 AM PDT by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

That's a great list.

Wonderful, informative post.


17 posted on 09/20/2006 11:17:52 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
"It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so volumionous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows that the law is today, can guess what it will be tomorrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule which is lettle known and less fixed?"
--James Madison, Federalist #62

And we have not come very far in the last 230 years have we?

18 posted on 09/20/2006 11:27:42 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

The income tax is income redistribution and confiscation of private property.
It is communism-lite.


20 posted on 09/20/2006 11:30:23 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

Ping for later


26 posted on 09/20/2006 11:57:51 AM PDT by PubliusMM (Just doin' my best to stay free and secure. God Bless our military personnel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
And an additional note on the Tax Court. It's something the IRS frequently tries to force you into as a ploy. Why??? The "entry fee" for Tax Court (a TC qualified tax lawyer) is pretty steep in many parts of the country. Where I live that minimum for starters is $25,000 and even more for some well-reputed barristers.

In many cases the IRS figures you rather pay your, say $50,000 (or whatever) to them that to gamble on paying the legal fees additionally as well.

Works for them.

28 posted on 09/20/2006 12:52:06 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
The broad-based income tax necessitates a large invasion of financial privacy that a low-rate consumption-based tax could avoid

This, and filling the pockets of politicians and their cronies, is what taxes are all about. Control of the masses.

33 posted on 09/20/2006 1:13:32 PM PDT by subterfuge (Do your part to educate a Democrat and keep on FReeping!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

This is great stuff, tpaine. Thanks for the post.


46 posted on 09/21/2006 6:08:43 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
You miss the point. Income taxes have very little to do with money. They are the primary source of unconstitutional power used by our elected Representatives. It is through the tax code that they wield the power to reward and punish behavior. They would not even give this up for a method that triple revenues at the expense of diminishing their power.
67 posted on 09/22/2006 12:38:56 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
with a fair and consumption-based tax. Many conservatives on FR oppose such a tax.. Why?
Because it's being sold with deception, half-truths and outright lies....Why is that?
71 posted on 09/22/2006 1:30:42 PM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
The income tax is a pre-tax before you rent stuff from the government.. with whats left..
Like houses, cars, boats and businesses...

How can they tax stuff you OWN?... Answer; they can't..
The american public is in gross denial..

152 posted on 09/23/2006 5:41:09 PM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
Many conservatives on FR oppose such a tax.. Why?

I, for one, have made past arrangements that were due to a calculation based upon the federal tax free nature of certain income in that arrangement. Changing that equation would cost my future stream of income a substantial amount of money.

Also, the after tax savings that I've accumulated over my lifetime (I'm very near retirement now) would see an immediate and drastic reduction in real value, due to the change in paying tax on income vs. paying tax on spending.

If the change would make provision for the lost value of savings, and the tax policy inducement to accept a tax free stream of income over a greater taxable stream of income (tax free municipal bonds for instance), it might be a "fair tax." Without provisions like that, it would be highway robbery of people so situated.

162 posted on 09/23/2006 8:24:58 PM PDT by GregoryFul (cheap, immigrant labor built America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

Ping


163 posted on 09/23/2006 8:40:13 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine

Tariffs are Constitutional. Income and consumption taxes were never meant to be collected to fund the government under our constitutional system.


167 posted on 09/23/2006 10:08:19 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tpaine
My wife just got back from Bermuda. She went with her two sisters, and left me at home :-(

Bermuda has no IRS. No income taxes. The taxes are all excise taxes, gas is $7.00, and to bring in a car, will cost if I heard correctly 100% the price of the car. Could be wrong. Tourism is #3 for bermuda. Banking is #1.

183 posted on 09/24/2006 3:33:21 PM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson