I firmly believe that this has nothing to do with what McCain believes is best for the country but instead what McCain thinks is best for his political aspirations. Divide the GOP for the 2006 midterms so he can ride in and save the party.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Republican Red
McPain will NEVER get my vote....I would write in deputy dawg before casting a vote for him
2 posted on
09/19/2006 9:12:19 AM PDT by
joe fonebone
(Israel, taking out the world's trash since 1948.)
To: prairiebreeze; Mo1
THANKS TO THE McCAIN AMENDMENT, WE ARE ALREADY OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE MIRANDA WARNINGS IF WE HAVE ANY HOPE OF USING CONFESSION EVIDENCE IN EVENTUAL TERRORIST TRIALS. By all means, let's give Miranda warnings to jihadists ON the battlefield. For that's matter, let's give them free legal advice ON the battlefield.
3 posted on
09/19/2006 9:12:22 AM PDT by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Republican Red; pinz-n-needlez; onyx; ohioWfan; Texasforever; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; ...
Soldiers have to read the terrorists their Miranda rights???
4 posted on
09/19/2006 9:14:35 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
To: Republican Red
The whole darn thing was a publicity stunt for McCain by the MSM. Torture was already illegal by federal law and all the Armed Forces had adopted the Army reg prohibiting torture and mistreatment of prisoners. The Abu Graib scumbags were prosecuted under the OLD law.
McCain took the Army reg, wrote it up in his bill and lied to the country, claiming we needed a "new" law, and his MSM accomplices lied for him.
So, now most of the country believes the Army was torturing prisoners before McStain rode to the rescue. A total lie, told to further his Presidential ambitions.
To: Republican Red
the UCMJ would require us to give Miranda warnings at the moment of battlefield captureThat's interesting. Despite what we see on TV, Miranda is only required for criminal suspects prior to questioning, not at the point of arrest. A good defense attorney can argue that the point of arrest is so confusing that the suspect did not fully understand their rights.
If you don't have any questions, no warning needed.
13 posted on
09/19/2006 9:27:47 AM PDT by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: Republican Red; pookie18
From Pookie's toons today:
15 posted on
09/19/2006 9:29:26 AM PDT by
eyespysomething
(http://crumbsandfun.blogspot.com/2006/09/ana-centeno-tribute.html)
To: Republican Red
For his next number, McCain will explore whether or not it should be ok to kill the enemy on the battlefield.
16 posted on
09/19/2006 9:36:56 AM PDT by
Graymatter
(TV-free and clean for 3 years, 4 months.)
To: Republican Red
McCain thinks we secure our freedom by setting the best example. But in fact, we will never earn the respect of those who criticize us now. We must secure our freedom by destroying terrorists, their safe havens, the states that support them, and the means by which they are funded. If McCain thinks we'll win respect from our enemies or those who are neutral by treating terrorists like potentially innocent citizens, then he is hopelessly naive. He, Warner, and Graham are endangering the US so they can popular with the New York Times and the Left. They're basically uncomfortable with those of us who are unabashedly proud of our country and eager to smite our foes who bring terrorists attacks to the US and the world. We embarrass them.
17 posted on
09/19/2006 9:39:37 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Civilization and democracy are under attack around the world, so Liberals attack Bush.)
To: Republican Red
Everything needing a presidential veto just has to have a fetal stem cell research funding rider attached to it.
19 posted on
09/19/2006 9:46:51 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Republican Red; Alex1977; DHC-2; gruntSGT; Peach; SC Swamp Fox; upchuck
I note in fairness that I believe Sen. Graham who I have criticized in these quarters for his stance on military commissions (see, e.g., here) has indicated during senate hearings that he does not think al Qaeda should profit from the UCMJ's generous Miranda protections (which are actually better than what criminals get in the civilian justice system). But that's irrelevant because the horse is already out of the barn.
Oops, Lindsay almost did something right.
Lindsey Ping
Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.
20 posted on
09/19/2006 9:53:05 AM PDT by
upchuck
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
To: Republican Red
This is beyond frightening. This is truly insane.
Miranda? For terrorists?
Tilt...we are in the twilight zone without a doubt.
21 posted on
09/19/2006 9:59:45 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-prayers for the kidnapped Israeli Soldiers)
To: Republican Red
"Attention class: THANKS TO THE McCAIN AMENDMENT, WE ARE ALREADY OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE MIRANDA WARNINGS IF WE HAVE ANY HOPE OF USING CONFESSION EVIDENCE IN EVENTUAL TERRORIST TRIALS."
Came to the conclusion that, McCain, Graham, Warner, and all the other defunct and derelict Senators and Reps. that are perverting the constitution along with our rights as United States citizens, are just cruel and heartless people...
To: Republican Red
McCain took money illegally from Keating. To assuage his guilty, he forced CFR on all of us to the detriment of government and the Constitution. McCain was a POW and to assuage his guilty he wants to give Al Qaeda Miranda, Geneva and UCMJ protections.
With McCain, there is nothing which is NOT about him. Its ALL about him. The guy is N. V. T. S. - NUTS! He has never won a GOP primary and he will not in 2008 (dem crossover votes don't count).
27 posted on
09/19/2006 10:21:47 AM PDT by
bpjam
(Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
To: Republican Red
28 posted on
09/19/2006 10:36:22 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Visualize dead terrorists. (don't let the libs tell you its against the Geneva Convention))
To: Republican Red
Until McCain deals with this face and what is behind it, I will
never trust him.
35 posted on
09/19/2006 11:27:36 AM PDT by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
Miranda warnings to increased numbers of enemy dead? Unlikely.
36 posted on
09/19/2006 11:57:36 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 16, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Republican Red
McCain, Graham, and Warner are GIRLIE MEN....Collins is a dumbass girl.
39 posted on
09/19/2006 1:11:12 PM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Republican Red
John McCain, you have the right to STHU
Anything you say, can and will be used against you in the voting booth.
If you can't afford an attorney, the ACLU will provide you one.
40 posted on
09/19/2006 2:03:16 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Republican Red
Forget the trials. Just shoot them. You're allowed to if they are out of uniform. Al Quada doesn't wear uniforms. You can't get information out of them. So shoot them. They're useless. Even more useless than McCain.,
41 posted on
09/19/2006 2:07:34 PM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: Republican Red
Exactly so; however, McLame will NEVER win the '08 GOP presidential primary and if he goes Indy, he won't get enough votes to allow a Dem to win either. He'd get far more votes from Dems.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson