Take note of the Democrats' "former" lead in the poll
To: screw boll
2 posted on
09/18/2006 12:13:50 PM PDT by
Dog
To: screw boll
"Zigby Poll"
I think you meant "Zigzagby poll"
3 posted on
09/18/2006 12:15:07 PM PDT by
mrsmith
To: screw boll
Don't get too excited: I still think we'll lose 7-10 in the house and 2-3 in the Senate.
But you are right that we won't lose control of either. I've been saying that for a while, and this just goes further to prove it.
To: screw boll
IT is Zogby, not Zigby. Sorry.
To: screw boll
These "national" polls mean NOTHING in congressional races. Each one is decided within its own district, and each district votes for specific reasons. The ONLY way to get an accurate poll of congressional districts is to take a separate poll WITHIN a congressional district, and then poll individual states for Senate races. Most people SAY they favor a specific party, but they always tend to vote for their own incumbent.
6 posted on
09/18/2006 12:16:24 PM PDT by
TommyDale
(Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
To: screw boll
Ignore polls - good or bad ones - they are a waste. All that matters is which groups get off of their duffs and vote.
7 posted on
09/18/2006 12:17:09 PM PDT by
GianniV
To: screw boll
The only polls that matter are the ones on election night.
9 posted on
09/18/2006 12:18:00 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: screw boll
"....staying in Control of Capital Hill...."
I think it is Capitol Hill that the Dems would like to control.
13 posted on
09/18/2006 12:21:51 PM PDT by
NEMDF
To: screw boll
A majority of the American population is right of center anyway so if the "I don't knows" are the indication of American opinion then the vote will be exactly the split as in the '04 election and it remains a Republican majority.
14 posted on
09/18/2006 12:22:03 PM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: screw boll
One of the things that is never mentioned is that Democrats are hurt by the fact that they tend to condense themselves into the same districts. Gerrymandered districts only make this worse. Thus by congregating into inner cities, etc. Dims may get a very safe seat that is 80% Democratic, but all of the surrounding districts go Republican with 55%.
Creating ghettos of solid voters has hurt them in the House. It also hurts them by making those Representatives that "own" those seats despite their idiocy and incompetence more senior. This puts their most radical, most insane performers in front of the camera the most.
I can't wait for Rep. Corrine Brown to get an important position (minority position of course). The more she's on the television the better.
To: screw boll
Psstttt....
Zogby "IS" a Dem ARAB!
Think you'll get an honest post out of him?
18 posted on
09/18/2006 12:24:14 PM PDT by
Rovendem
To: screw boll
Zigby rocks!
24 posted on
09/18/2006 12:30:28 PM PDT by
evets
(beer)
To: screw boll
Is this the classic "Dems peaking to early as the Republicans start the upward trend to peak at just the right time--Election day?" I hope so. I would love to see Republican pick up seats and totally destroy the democrats like Michigan destroyed Notre Shame.
28 posted on
09/18/2006 12:39:56 PM PDT by
MAD-AS-HELL
(How to win over terrorist? KILL them with UNKINDNESS.)
To: screw boll
I think we can get through November with a net loss of zero senate seats, and a net loss of less than 10 HOR seats.
But I would warn against underestimating the fraud potential of the rats.
33 posted on
09/18/2006 1:09:05 PM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: screw boll
37 posted on
09/18/2006 1:31:35 PM PDT by
griswold3
(Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006- No!! You cannot have my governor in 2008.)
To: screw boll
39 posted on
10/01/2012 12:36:02 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(We are the 53%, who pay taxes and keep this country going inspite of the 47% rat moochers!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson