Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamists at Westminster Cathedral
LGF ^ | Sept 17, 2006

Posted on 09/17/2006 2:27:05 PM PDT by jdm

Worshippers coming out of services at London’s Westminster Cathedral today were greeted by a gang of Islamists, reports Joee Blogs - a Catholic Londoner.

As we came out about 100 Islamists were chanting slogans such as “Pope Benedict go to Hell,” “Pope Benedict you will pay, the Muja Hadeen are coming your way,” “Pope Benedict watch your back,” and other hateful things.

View Comments


TOPICS: United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: benedictxvi; cathedral; catholic; islam; islamevilempire; islamists; muslims; persecution; pope; trop; westminster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: jdm
The British are committing slow-motion suicide by even permitting these monsters to live freely in their midst.

If the British wish to survive as a free people, they will have to expel each and every one of these Islamists and make sure they never get back in.
41 posted on 09/17/2006 2:58:16 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb
Westminster buttresses.
42 posted on 09/17/2006 2:58:39 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I have a basic question....

Why does their "god".... and/or their god's name... or their god's "prophet" need to be defended at all...

Can't their "god"... make himself known -- and fight for his own reputation with signs and wonders...

Maybe their "god" is asleep.... the muzzies should pray and cry out louder... to see if he will awaken and defend them....
Shades of Mt Carmel....

Amazing.... simply amazing...

43 posted on 09/17/2006 2:58:59 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (All of the answers remain available; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind
A fools errand.

The secret to an understanding of Islam is the word "politics". As long as the Sharia courts work better than the civil courts, and the mullahs require nothing more than that you wash your hands and arms with invisible water, most Moslems will go along with it.

Best bet on destabilizing Islam is convincing these guys to adopt the Uniform Commercial Code developed in the United States. That's an act that can almost guarantee that everybody gets rich.

44 posted on 09/17/2006 2:59:43 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Time for the rest of the world to begin protesting evil at their mosques.


45 posted on 09/17/2006 2:59:52 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (does anyone still doubt mecca is the throne of satan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

46 posted on 09/17/2006 3:00:34 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

sorry. there they are. westminster cathedral buttresses.


47 posted on 09/17/2006 3:00:59 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Are masks/face veils/face coverings legal in Britain? Just curious :)


48 posted on 09/17/2006 3:01:31 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

49 posted on 09/17/2006 3:01:35 PM PDT by wolficatZ ("..a creature from the prehistoric past. The terrible, fearsome, Croco-Stimpy! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
What's with the masks? Why do Muslim men cover their faces? Is this the GQ version of a male burqah?

Just cowards hiding.

50 posted on 09/17/2006 3:01:53 PM PDT by fanfan (Trust everybody, but cut the cards yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind
Why does their "god".... and/or their god's name... or their god's "prophet" need to be defended at all...

An excellent point. Normally, God defends the believers, not the reverse. And defending can mean giving them the strength to go through martyrdom and be sacrificed for the truth. Not among Muslims, though, who have such a feeble god it needs to be "defended" by veiled nutcases.

51 posted on 09/17/2006 3:03:05 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

Oh, I see - they had their backs to the cathedral and were facing the press! Thanks for the clarification.


52 posted on 09/17/2006 3:04:56 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Good thing it's a religion of peace. Think of what they'd say otherwise.

/sarcasm

53 posted on 09/17/2006 3:05:33 PM PDT by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry; jdm; livius
To bless Mohamed who's already there? I don't think so.

Medieval and Renaissance Christian and secular artists had no religious restrictions regarding depictions of Mohammed, and were free to show his face and body in their entirety.


This picture is of an early Renaissance fresco in Bologna's Church of San Petronio, created by Giovanni da Modena and depicting Mohammed being tortured in Hell.


The fresco is in an inaccessible part of the church and is now only visible at an angle from a distance; this old black-and-white image is one of the few official photos ever taken that shows a straight frontal view of the figures.

54 posted on 09/17/2006 3:06:22 PM PDT by NYer ("That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah." Hillel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jdm
The reason I ask about the legality is that places in the States have bans.

This is NYC's, last I knew anyway :)

Anti-Mask: New York Penal Law § 240.35(4)

SUMMARY New York’s anti-mask law criminalizes the wearing of masks or disguises by three or more persons in a public place unless done in connection with a “masquerade party or like entertainment,” after obtaining a permit to wear masks from the police or other appropriate authorities. The courts have defined “like entertainment” as “social gatherings, dances, andperformances that involve masks or costumes,” Under the current law, wearing a bandana tied around one’s face falls within the scope of the mask prohibition. The courts have held that the anti-mask law furthers the important governmental interest of deterring violence and facilitating the apprehension of wrong-doers who seek to hide theiridentity. Since 2001, both the New York City Criminal Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals have held that the anti-mask law is not overly broad or facially unconstitutional.Moreover, both courts have rejected all case-specific challenges that the law was unconstitutional “as applied.”....

55 posted on 09/17/2006 3:06:39 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"What's with the masks? Why do Muslim men cover their faces? Is this the GQ version of a male burqah?"

Probably because they arrested a bunch of the brats last time. Funny how they're calling others evil when they're hiding from the law.


56 posted on 09/17/2006 3:07:00 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"What's with the masks? Why do Muslim men cover their faces?"

Standard police tactics for dealing with this kind of protest is to avoid piling in and escalating things unless necessary. But they will get everything on film and anyone identified as having committed an offence will get a '4am knock' in a few days time.


57 posted on 09/17/2006 3:08:05 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jdm

58 posted on 09/17/2006 3:09:33 PM PDT by mjp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Korinamils can't tell one Christian from another.

All Christians need to set their differences aside with one another, Scimitar won't distinguish denominations.
59 posted on 09/17/2006 3:10:01 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (The Internet is the samizdat of liberty..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman
Earlier than 1979, try just after the Revolution:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=22314

America's First War on Terror By Andrew G. Bostom FrontPageMagazine.com | May 4, 2006

60 posted on 09/17/2006 3:10:35 PM PDT by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson