1 posted on
09/16/2006 3:31:01 PM PDT by
ikez78
To: ash-housewares; Peach; jveritas; jwalsh07; ladyinred; EQAndyBuzz; Marine_Uncle; ...
2 posted on
09/16/2006 3:31:36 PM PDT by
ikez78
(www.regimeofterror.com)
To: ikez78; Peach; backhoe
The United States invaded Iraq six months later. But U.S. troops have found no such weapons there. The Senate report, echoing earlier findings by the September 11 commission, also concludes that Saddam Hussein had no relationship with al Qaeda. FReepers know better than this. And we have the links to prove it :)
The Senate report is a bunch of BS.
3 posted on
09/16/2006 3:45:40 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
To: ikez78
What a bunch of crapola this whole article is!!!
Bush NEVER, EVER said there was an imminent threat by Saddam..AND it tries to say that Bush linked Saddam to 9/11.
Enough said.
4 posted on
09/16/2006 3:46:35 PM PDT by
Txsleuth
(,((((((((ISRAEL)))))) Pray for the release of the Israelis.)
To: ikez78
Drumheller's disclosure contradicted spy agency documents quoting the same Iraqi source as saying Saddam did have such programs, according to an addendum to the Senate report written by three Republican senators including chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas.
"We have differing interpretations, and I think mine's right," Drumheller, who has already testified on the matter before the committee, told Reuters on Friday. Drumheller is preparing to publish a book about his 26-year career that will include material on Iraq and the U.S. war on terrorism So the dems are basing their argument on one guys interpretation instead of all the documents?
7 posted on
09/16/2006 3:52:39 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
To: ikez78
I'm tired of arguments about the wisdom of invading Iraq. It happened, it's over, and there are more pressing matters in front of us now.
To: ikez78
Never believe a guy who's trying to sell his book.
To: ikez78
The official, Tyler Drumheller, told CBS that the Iraqi government source had said Iraq had no active unconventional weapons program.
Liar liar panties on fire.
The source said just the opposite.
13 posted on
09/16/2006 4:32:05 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: ikez78
Several outright lies in this article but I stopped reading when this appeared.
"President George W. Bush warned Americans that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat and that Saddam had ties to the al Qaeda network responsible for the September 11 attacks."
Absolute RUBBISH, absolutely UNTRUE!!
15 posted on
09/16/2006 4:37:25 PM PDT by
PISANO
To: ikez78
A U.S. Senate panel has begun an inquiry... Sure, why not! It's not like the Senate has anything better to do. /sarc
19 posted on
09/16/2006 5:06:33 PM PDT by
SMM48
To: ikez78
Just gotta keep digging. Undermining the U.S is a msm and liberal occupation.
To: ikez78
28 posted on
05/29/2015 1:04:58 PM PDT by
Homer1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson