Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Dodge Thomas

"so we would be looking at an open-ended occupation of Iran"

Not of Iran, just their oil fields. THat is my WHOLE point. We can forgo a messy occupation and nation building type venture. We cut off their funds and destroy their nuke capabilities. They will no longer have funds to support terrorism. They will no longer have a military to suppress the populace.

True they would be more mad at us than the mullahs, but who cares?

CYP


46 posted on 09/15/2006 1:28:24 PM PDT by Check_Your_Premises (Ceterum censeo <Islamofascism> esse delendam -Huerro the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Check_Your_Premises
Not of Iran, just their oil fields. THat is my WHOLE point.

And how do we decide who to sell this oil to?

And for how much?

Do we join OPEC?

The entire world would see this as a US theft of a sovereign nation's natural resources - if you remember the US lead multinational invasion of Iraq the first time around was because Iraq had invaded Kuwait and seized oil fields there.

In addition, such an occupation would not even solve he problem that was its "cause" in the first place: unless we invade the rest of Iran to dig out their nuclear program it would continue, even if the government in Tehran has to starve their population to do so.

68 posted on 09/15/2006 5:57:01 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson