Posted on 09/15/2006 10:41:04 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim
While thousands came on 9/11/2006 to honor and remember the 3,000 murdered five years ago by Islamofascists terrorists, a couple hundred people came to repeat scurrilous accusations. Their gathering to express these views is free speech yet their gathering on 9/11, at Ground Zero, says a lot about their lack of character.
CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE FOR DETAILS
The leader of these self-proclaimed "9/11 truthers" is Alex Jones, who was also there Monday. He is the guy in the sunglasses in the bottom left of the photo below. The truth is the last thing these ghouls want for their otherwise mundane lives have been made "better" and some of their personal fortunes have increased solely based upon innuendo.
One prime theory the "9/11 truthers" have is the World Trade Center Twin towers, as well as WTC building 7, collapsed not because United Airlines flights 11 and 175 were crashed into the North and South Towers. Instead, they theorize they were all brought down by controlled demolition. Protec, the foremost authority on controlled demolitions, examined this assertion and strongly disagrees. Take a few minutes and read their report. While facts will not cause the "9/11 truthers" to slink off in shame, you will be far better informed than the next foolish person you hear saying, "WTC 7 was pulled."
This is the second in a continuing series of articles on Stop the New York Times.org. Please also see Dishonoring the 9/11 dead.
I'm with you on this one. (re post#11)
Sheesh, don't they have medication for this crap?
I doubt they could have assembled an uglier bunch of twits.
Thanks for the link!
(and thanks for your home page, very interesting!)
Okay, your #26, now I know you're not to be even looked at. You might wanna check snopes or truthorfiction before you post lame crap like that. Gimme a break man!!!!!!!
I don't see any difference between these sick wackos and the nuts here on FR who think the U.S. government killed JFK.
I won't listen to what they have to say because what they have to say is pure unadulterated cow dung.
Who are you to describe others as ugly?
Someone with an opinion. Get over it.
Well, I'm sure that my observation had nothing at all to do with their unkempt, greasy-looking hair and scowling visages.
Otherwise, I might have concluded they all worked for the Department of Motor Vehicles. Just signed up today, did we?
At least you have that one right.
Not even close.
Try "because we are familiar with many of them and know that their income depends on selling 9/11 conspiracy theories, not 'holding down a job'".
That's about the size of it.
By the way, you're misspelling words all over the place. You need to calm down and think of England.
Is that you, George Galloway?
"Since Sep 16, 2006"
Go trolling somewhere else - I have nothing but contempt for anyone who makes excuses for the IRA!!!!!
Another pro-IRA troll bites the dust!!
Such as?
[and from earlier post #39] [we] just have a couple of questions is all
Such as?
Such as?
Several others have asked the same. Why won't you specify?
I never heard of them before and I am always involved in some sort of news information. That could be a good thing if they are not getting much press. They are just a group of wackos that are pretty much ignored. I hope it continues that way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.