Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A call to disarm
The Daily Toreador (Texas) ^ | 9/14/06 | Chris Kellerman

Posted on 09/14/2006 11:08:33 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

A lot of people have been trying to add amendments to the constitution lately. They want a ban on gay marriage, on flag burning and a few others I won't mention here because they're almost as ridiculous as a ban on flag burning. However, since we're talking so much about adding, I think we need to take one away. Here it is: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

You got it - the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Frankly, folks, I'm tired of it. We debate it all the time and get nowhere, so I say let's just remove it all together.

But no. In America, if you question the Constitution or the founders, you might as well be questioning your own status as an American citizen. The founders are treated like prophets and the Constitution like the Bible. I am so tired of it! People throw quotes from Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin into political debates with me all the time, and I want to hit them in the face. Who cares what James Madison and the rest said? They've been dead for more than 150 years! Yes, they were very smart and did an amazing job with the formation of our country. But they aren't alive today, and their views on guns, religion and - oh, yes - slaves, simply do not apply.

Let's not forget what the founders said about "all other Persons" (black people) in the Constitution. In congressional representation, each non-white was counted as three-fifths of a person. Do we hate the founders for it? No. We may despise the crime of slavery, but over time, we fixed it. Now it's time to fix the crime of the second amendment.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, there were more than 30,000 gun deaths in the United States in 2003 - all because of guns. Gun-lovers often say things such as, "Guns don't kill people. People do." Well, that's true, it is not the gun itself that kills a person. However, it certainly makes it easier.

Next you'll hear a gun-lover say that if everybody had guns, we'd be much safer. Honestly, I have no idea how that works. I suppose they think that everyone would be able to protect themselves. Man, too bad nobody with a gun was around presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan when they got shot. Oh wait, the United States Secret Service. I'd say that the Secret Service is pretty well trained, but I suppose gun-lovers think that we'd all be much faster than the bodyguards for the President of the United States.

The final argument by gun-lovers, and the one that sounds the best on the surface, is that there are plenty of other ways to kill people than guns. For example, baseball bats. So why shouldn't we outlaw baseball bats? Well, one reason is because there were 150 times more gun deaths than strike (bludgeon) deaths in the U.S. in 2003. Besides, baseball bats are made to hit baseballs. Guns are made for one reason - to kill people.

We talk about the culture of life in the United States, and I think that's good. We need to create a society that values every single life. If we do not start with that philosophy, we'll never agree on anything. I'm against abortion, the death penalty, euthanasia and most wars. I'm also against a system that allows people to carry weapons that have the extraordinary ability to kill people at a very far distance. When it comes to all of those issues, I strongly believe that everyone else should think the exact same thing. When you're talking about people's lives, protection of every single life is the only correct way to go.

Let's repeal the Second Amendment and start over with new gun laws that actually make sense. Hunters should be able to hunt, and policemen should be able to protect our communities, but there are not many other reasons for people to have guns. Wouldn't it be great to appeal one ridiculous amendment and save thousands of lives? I sure think so, and I bet if those Founding Fathers whose words we defend were alive today, they would agree.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; liberals; mustbesarcasm; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: GW and Twins Pawpaw
I wouldn't call this article 'work'. He may get paid for it, but it's not work. All a leftist attacking the 2nd Amendment has to do is go to DU/Daily Kos/Rosie O'Donnell/VPC/etc website and "cut and paste" their lies and drivel to make an "article".

Most FReepers do more investigative journalism, creative thinking, and constructive debate in a 10 line post than the MSM does in a week.
21 posted on 09/14/2006 11:24:21 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

....."You got it - the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Frankly, folks, I'm tired of it. We debate it all the time and get nowhere, so I say let's just remove it all together".....

As a great man said not to long ago:

"OVER MY COLD DEAD HANDS!"

YOu come to my house and try to disarm me and see where your going to get planted....


22 posted on 09/14/2006 11:26:59 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 (My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

I thought he was a kid at UT who wrote a piece and got it published in the school paper. I got my doctorate from the UT system but I wouldn't send my kid there. Especially Austin.


23 posted on 09/14/2006 11:27:28 AM PDT by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

What a good little dhimmi the author is! Let's disarm the sheeple so they can be more easily conquered by the Religion of Peace!

Excuse me, I have to go throw up now...


24 posted on 09/14/2006 11:28:43 AM PDT by RebelBanker (We must not and cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Let's just sum up this turd's feeeeeeeelings:

I don't understand guns, so they must be bad.


25 posted on 09/14/2006 11:28:52 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Wouldn't it be great to appeal one ridiculous amendment and save thousands of lives? I sure think so, and I bet if those Founding Fathers whose words we defend were alive today, they would agree.

Save 1000s of lives based on what fact
26 posted on 09/14/2006 11:31:41 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Chris Kellerman .......
From my cold dead hands, but not until then.


27 posted on 09/14/2006 11:31:46 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I think that the writer fails to realize that if someone or some group of people can take away my right to have a gun they can take away any of my rights.


28 posted on 09/14/2006 11:33:37 AM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KenHorse
At least he's smart enough to acknowledge that the 2nd DOES AFFIRM THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT

I guarantee that in an actual discussion Kellerman will argue both that the 2nd should be repealed and that it confers no right on individuals. He will also probably mention that killing a deer is no different from killing a person.

29 posted on 09/14/2006 11:34:31 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KenHorse
hat must be some kind of first for a gun grabber.....

Don't forget, along with acknowledging the second amendment, he his also the first one to be publicly honest enough to attempt to change it the correct way, buy another amendment.

Up to now all we have gotten from them is judges limiting it as a sneak around way to change things.

When Carrie Nation and her ilk went after alcohol, they did it right, it failed of course, but her solution was far more honest than anything we have seen with drugs or firearms.

30 posted on 09/14/2006 11:34:46 AM PDT by kAcknor (Don't flatter yourself.... It is a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
So he wants to hit "gun lovers" in the face? He better be prepared to get hit back, gun or no gun.
31 posted on 09/14/2006 11:34:54 AM PDT by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
There was a Josh Kellerman who was with some outfit in DC that was the first to come up with the idea of suing the gun manufacturer for gun crimes. I did a phone interview with him and an article on him as well, but I can't remember the name of his organization. I wouldn't be surprised if this guy is related to him.

Carolyn

32 posted on 09/14/2006 11:38:11 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Hang him.


33 posted on 09/14/2006 11:38:48 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
Let's repeal the Second Amendment and start over with new gun laws that actually make sense.

The Second Amendment makes sense just fine. You're the one not making any sense.


34 posted on 09/14/2006 11:39:51 AM PDT by lowbridge (I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming, like his passengers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"Guns are made for one reason - to kill people."
"Hunters should be able to hunt ..."

People?

35 posted on 09/14/2006 11:41:27 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
I forgot this line:
I sure think so, and I bet if those Founding Fathers whose words we defend were alive today, they would agree.

Actually, looking at the writings of the Founding Fathers, they most assuredly would NOT favor deleting the 2nd Amendment!!! They would demand that the US Citizenry be granted full access to military firearms (Level III) and all the "implements of war".

The reason the Founding Fathers wanted the citizenry (a citizen, not a subject) to be armed was to defend ourselves from criminals and these very elites and their lust for dictatorial power over the body of the people.

Also, how many of these "gun related deaths" that the author speaks of were "gang on gang" or caused by criminals? How about we take care of that problem? Oh, wait, that would rob the left of a large voting block if the criminals were dead... That must be why the left doesn't want us to defend ourselves against criminals!! If we kill criminals, then the left loses voters.

Now if we could only get the unborn to vote, the left would immediately outlaw abortion!

http://www.gunowners.org/fs9403.htm


36 posted on 09/14/2006 11:42:02 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Purely and simply, a hoplophobic.

God Bless Colonel Jeff Cooper!


37 posted on 09/14/2006 11:42:16 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

There is something morally wrong with slavery and counting a black person as 3/5 of a person. That's why they changed it.

There's nothing morally wrong with the right to keep and bear arms. In fact, I'd say the opposite.


38 posted on 09/14/2006 11:43:41 AM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevio

Go to this paper and read the comments to this jackleg's anti 2nd A rant....
http://www.dailytoreador.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticleComments&ustory_id=9b64c002-f055-4431-b2bb-8994ac57bf25


39 posted on 09/14/2006 11:44:03 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
You got it - the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Frankly, folks, I'm tired of it. We debate it all the time and get nowhere, so I say let's just remove it all together.

Remove my life from my body first.

Because you sure will need to.

40 posted on 09/14/2006 11:44:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson