Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Story Behind Armitage's Role(Bob Novak)
Real Clear Politics ^ | September 14, 2006 | Robert Novak

Posted on 09/14/2006 4:35:19 AM PDT by kellynla

WASHINGTON -- When Richard Armitage finally acknowledged last week he was my source three years ago in revealing Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA employee, the former deputy secretary of state's interviews obscured what he really did. I want to set the record straight based on firsthand knowledge.

First, Armitage did not, as he now indicates, merely pass on something he had heard and that he "thought" might be so. Rather, he identified to me the CIA division where Mrs. Wilson worked, and said flatly that she recommended the mission to Niger by her husband, former Amb. Joseph Wilson. Second, Armitage did not slip me this information as idle chitchat, as he now suggests. He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column.

An accurate depiction of what Armitage actually said deepens the irony of him being my source. He was a foremost internal skeptic of the administration's war policy, and I long had opposed military intervention in Iraq. Zealous foes of George W. Bush transformed me improbably into the president's lapdog. But they cannot fit Armitage into the left-wing fantasy of a well-crafted White House conspiracy to destroy Joe and Valerie Wilson. The news that he and not Karl Rove was the leaker was devastating news for the Left.

A peculiar convergence had joined Armitage and me on the same historical path. During his quarter of a century in Washington, I had no contact with Armitage before our fateful interview. I tried to see him in the first two and one-half years of the Bush administration, but he rebuffed me -- summarily and with disdain, I thought.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: armitage; bobnovak; libby; plame; robertnovak; rove; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: G Larry

NO!!! Wilson said there is no evidence that Iraq was going after Yellow Cake "THROUGH LEGAL CHANNELS". And he said further: If Saddam was intent on purchasing yellow cake, it was through illegal channels.


41 posted on 09/14/2006 10:55:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Laverne

Holy Mackerel!

I had missed Snow's "Patience" response.

Hmmmm...

I thought the most important part of Novak's column is in the last paragraph: "When Armitage now says he was mute because of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's request, that does not explain his silent three months between his claimed first realization that he was the source and Fitzgerald's appointment on Dec. 30. Armitage's tardy self-disclosure is tainted because it is deceptive."


42 posted on 09/14/2006 11:07:22 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

NOOOO!

He didn't say "going after" he said "had bought"!!!!


43 posted on 09/14/2006 11:37:39 AM PDT by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
gridlock said: "You don't need to hypothesize some grand conspiracy to explain Beltway Insiders behaving like petty backstabbing weasels. "

You should offer tag lines like this for sale.

44 posted on 09/14/2006 12:30:10 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
And Fitzgerald owes the American taxpayers three years back pay.

You're kind of soft on criminals aren't you? /semi-sarcasm ; )

I think he owes the taxpayers the entire cost of the investigation and the trial. He should also lose his law license and spend a few years doing a mandatory minimum in a federal pen.

45 posted on 09/14/2006 1:47:30 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Given that the White House knows the Democrats are going to be taking cheap shots at them on a daily basis, it behooves them to give the opposition a nice tempting target off to the side to shoot at.

The great thing is that the WH didn't give them this target at all. This whole red herring was generated by one of their own. Joe Wilson. The rest of the libidiots just ran with it.

I don't know what Karl Rove gets paid but it has to be too much. I think his main strategeric advice must be "Go to work every day and do what you think needs doing. Ignore the Dems. Do not publicly gloat when their grand assaults on you blow up in their faces."

46 posted on 09/14/2006 2:05:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Maybe you intended "investigation" to cover it -- but shouldn't he also have to reimburse everyone involved for their legal bills?
47 posted on 09/14/2006 2:13:26 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Consider the level of civility and cooperation that was extended to Fitzgerald by this administration, as compared to how Ken Starr was treated by the Clinton gang.This shows the difference between all class, and no class.


48 posted on 09/14/2006 2:25:22 PM PDT by steve7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: maryz
I was just talking about those expenses that the taxpayers have incurred. I guess I envisioned that private individuals would have to sue on their own.

The reporter who spent a few months in jail might be one. She could ask for a hefty settlement for pain-and-suffering on top of her expenses I would think. She also ought to find a prosecuter to bring charges for false imprisonment as well.

49 posted on 09/14/2006 2:25:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: steve7
What do you expect from people like this?
50 posted on 09/14/2006 2:28:06 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

51 posted on 09/14/2006 2:47:04 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
I don't subscribe to the theory above, but I can suggest an answer to your question.

How did he get 2 "journalists" (Isikoff and Corn) who are not exactly Bushbots to write a book outing the whole affair, just in time to affect the '06 elections?

Two reasons IMO: 1) I think the entire Left expected Libby to do what they would have done--cop to some kind of plea deal to avoid the financial devastation and emotional agony of an ugly and drawn out investigation and prosecution, not to mention real physical fear if he got jail time.

If his "deal" could be worded by Fitz in such a way that Rove and Cheney seemed to be implicated, that's a bonus better than "getting" Libby even if they couldn't prosecute the big boys.

Libby really threw the Left a bean ball when he chose to go to trial and had the effrontery to subpoena lefty operatives like Russert and his wife, the editor of Vanity Fair. Mr. Grunewald must be crapping himself as well.

They cannot afford to have these operatives exposed and much worse,the possible exposure of the left-wing, anti-American cabal in the CIA and the State Department. Above all else, the Left does NOT want this case to go to trial!

What they thought was a club to beat the Bush administration over the head with has turned into a potential saber through their own hearts. They sooo need this trial to go away and not happen because this story is no longer an asset in '06 elections; it's a horrible liability.

It's a big enough liability that they'll throw their allies--Wilson, Plame, Fitz, Armitage, maybe even Powell--right under the bus to stop the trial and then hope the DBM can suffocate the story altogether.

Reason #2: they make some bucks from selling a book, any book.

52 posted on 09/14/2006 3:26:13 PM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sal
Now I like that one.

Good on ya.

53 posted on 09/14/2006 3:33:38 PM PDT by evad (sarcasm may be introduced at any moment of any post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I don't know what Karl Rove gets paid but it has to be too much.

The great innovation of the Bush Administration is that they do not expend political capital to raise the President's approval rating when it doesn't matter. The President has to be popular on five days in eight years, the day he is elected, the day he is re-elected, two mid-terms election days and the day his successor is elected. Wasting time and effort getting that number up on any other day is just vanity.

54 posted on 09/14/2006 3:39:15 PM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

LOL Too true!


55 posted on 09/14/2006 4:51:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; nutmeg

This is an excellent article.
It sounds as though Novak is a bit miffed at Armitage.

GOOD.

Thank you for the post and ping.


56 posted on 09/14/2006 9:31:22 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson