Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution Is Practically Useless, Admits Darwinist
Creation Evolution Headlines ^ | 08/30/06 | Creation Evolution Headlines

Posted on 09/13/2006 3:52:47 PM PDT by DannyTN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,061-1,070 next last
To: Physicist; muawiyah
As long as you think that'll fly on Judgment Day.

HMMmmm...

Judges 16:30
Samson said, "Let me die with the Philistines!" Then he pushed with all his might, and down came the temple on the rulers and all the people in it. Thus he killed many more when he died than while he lived.

541 posted on 09/14/2006 12:06:55 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
Could those ancestors be monkeys, by any chance?

Proto-monkey/human base stock, I think is the standard 'wisdom'.

542 posted on 09/14/2006 12:08:31 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
Science just happens not to care about political correctness, religious correctness, or anybody's personal feelings, for that matter.

True; but ScienTISTS usually do!

543 posted on 09/14/2006 12:09:30 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
Seems to me that the two above declarative statements, We descend from monkeys and We descended to monkeys. contradict each others.

Think harder.

If we descended TO monkeys, it follows that we must have been something other than monkeys.

Of course. Our ancestors were once fish. Fish are not monkeys. A fur piece down the family tree, our ancestors were monkeys. "We" (meaning our chain of descent, not necessarily we as individuals) became monkeys. We descended to monkeys, from fish (with many intervening steps, of course).

Iow, we did not descend FROM monkeys to begin with since we were other than monkeys, but through passage of time descended TO monkeys.

Whether or not we descended from monkeys depends on how you define monkeys. Most people would define monkeys in such a way that humans are excluded for want of a tail, or some other feature. If that's your take, then we definitely descended from monkeys, because we aren't monkeys, but have monkey ancestors.

Some people take the view that humans are a type of monkey. Such people might not want to say that we descended FROM monkeys, any more than we might say we descended from Americans.

Since I am an American, I wouldn't say I descended from Americans, but that my family descended TO Americans. Did we descend from Europeans? That's certainly true for most of us. Did we descend from Africans? If you go back far enough, apparently the answer is also yes. Did my family descend to being Europeans, from Africans? Yes, that's also true. We've moved on since then, but certainly we did in fact descend to Europeans, sometime in the past.

So it is perfectly true to say that my family descended FROM Europeans. It is equally true to say that my family descended TO Europeans (at some earlier time). No contradiction at all.

544 posted on 09/14/2006 12:10:47 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
 
God created evolution.
 
The CHRISTIAN veiw of this 'creator' is quite different than the one Evolution allows one to believe in.
 
 



 
Isa 48:3 ... I have declared the former things from the beginning; and they went forth out of My mouth, and I shewed them; I did [them] SUDDENLY, and they came to pass.
 

Indeed!!

Genesis 1
 
 1.  In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
 2.  Now the earth was  formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
 3.  And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
 
 
This is a GOD who creates by speaking; but; how LONG did it take?
 
Now Jesus was a man who had God-like powers.  Was HE God?   The Book says so.......
 
 
 
 
NIV Colossians 1:13-17
 13.  For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves,
 14.  in whom we have redemption,  the forgiveness of sins. 
 15.  He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
 16.  For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.
 17.  He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
 
 
NIV Revelation 4:11
   "You are worthy, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power, for you created all things, and by your will they were created and have their being."
 
 
NIV Revelation 10:6
   And he swore by him who lives for ever and ever, who created the heavens and all that is in them, the earth and all that is in it, and the sea and all that is in it, and said, "There will be no more delay!

 
Notice that when this man speaks, things happen RIGHT NOW!   Not after some times passes and the body heals itself.
 
 
 
NIV Matthew 8:2-3
 2.  A man with leprosy  came and knelt before him and said, "Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean."
 3.  Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!" Immediately he was cured  of his leprosy.
 
 
NIV Matthew 21:19
   Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, "May you never bear fruit again!" Immediately the tree withered.
 
 
NIV Mark 1:41-42
 41.  Filled with compassion, Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!"
 42.  Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cured.
 
 
NIV Mark 5:41-42
 41.  He took her by the hand and said to her, "Talitha koum!" (which means, "Little girl, I say to you, get up!").
 42.  Immediately the girl stood up and walked around (she was twelve years old). At this they were completely astonished.
 
 
NIV Mark 10:51-52
 51.  "What do you want me to do for you?" Jesus asked him.   The blind man said, "Rabbi, I want to see."
 52.  "Go," said Jesus, "your faith has healed you." Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus along the road.
 
 
NIV Luke 5:13
  Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. "I am willing," he said. "Be clean!" And Immediately the leprosy left him.
 
 
NIV Luke 5:24-25
 24.  But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins. . . ." He said to the paralyzed man, "I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home."
 25.  Immediately he stood up in front of them, took what he had been lying on and went home praising God.
 
 
NIV Luke 8:44
  She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and Immediately her bleeding stopped.
 
 
NIV Luke 13:12-13
 12.  When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, "Woman, you are set free from your infirmity."
 13.  Then he put his hands on her, and Immediately she straightened up and praised God.
 
 
NIV Luke 18:42-43
 42.  Jesus said to him, "Receive your sight; your faith has healed you."
 43.  Immediately he received his sight and followed Jesus, praising God. When all the people saw it, they also praised God.
 
 
NIV Acts 9:33-35
 33.  There he found a man named Aeneas, a paralytic who had been bedridden for eight years.
 34.  "Aeneas," Peter said to him, "Jesus Christ heals you. Get up and take care of your mat." Immediately Aeneas got up.
 35.  All those who lived in Lydda and Sharon saw him and turned to the Lord.
 
 
NIV Matthew 8:13
 13.  Then Jesus said to the centurion, "Go! It will be done just as you believed it would." And his servant was healed at that very hour.
 
 
NIV Matthew 15:28
 28.  Then Jesus answered, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted." And her daughter was healed from that very hour.


 
Now if this same personage, who does things in an instant;  how LONG would it take Him to CREATE all that we find around us???


545 posted on 09/14/2006 12:12:05 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Once again the Yin/Yang imagery of the Bible strikes home.


546 posted on 09/14/2006 12:13:39 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
You pick up a monkey that's used to human handling, and he grips your finger with his little hand, and you feel the powerful intelligence and emotions behind it and you know this critter is some kind of relative.

Now if he had feathers and was called a cockatou you'd get that same feeling, but you'd know there's some sort of "gulf" somewhere ~ but it doesn't matter. I love those birds.

547 posted on 09/14/2006 12:16:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; RadioAstronomer
Here's one thing I know ~ other than finding buried reefs, under which heavy hydrocarbons can get trapped, I fail to see where any understanding of biological processes would be needed to find oil.

Yes, we know that you fail to see why such understanding would be useful. This is no different than your lack of knowledge in other fields causing you to fail to see things on a wide variety of topics.

Rest assured, though, that the professionals in those fields are in no way limited by your personal level of ignorance.

Besides, the first guys into drilling knew none of those things and found oil anyway.

As I was saying...

Look, son, "the first guys into drilling" managed to get along without more advanced knowledge for the same reason that the Wright brothers managed to get along without knowledge of jet engine technology, trans-Mach aerodynamics, and high-tech composite materials science -- they weren't shooting very high, and even modest results are an advancement in a field that is at its barest beginnings.

But that doesn't mean that modern aeronautics can get by with just fabric-covered cloth and 19th-century gasoline engines, nor can modern petroleum engineers get by with just Drake's methods.

And speaking of which, Drake managed to find oil in the world's first attempt at drilling for oil because a) he was drilling in an area where oil was so plentiful that it often seeped right out of the ground, and b) he was drilling where other people had already hit shallow oil by accident while drilling for water wells. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to think that maybe you can hit oil on purpose drilling in an area where people had long been hitting it by accident. But that won't pay the bills if you're looking for oil today.

The easy, too-obvious-to-miss, close-to-the-surface oil deposits have long since been tapped, and today it takes the expert application of many kinds of specialized knowledge to locate deep oil with a success rate sufficient to cover the cost of the many inevitable failed exploration attempts. I'm astounded that this was somehow too complicated for you to figure out for yourself, because it's really freaking obvious.

Furthermore, even "the first guys into drilling" crapped out in the long run due to their insufficient understanding of oil geology. Drake, the man famous for drilling the first planned oil well, lost all of his savings in oil speculation in 1863, and ended up a broke old man.

548 posted on 09/14/2006 12:19:40 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
Evolution is more of a phylosophy, a faith or belief. More akin to pseudo science, but definitively not a science.

Aw, c'mon. Fess up. You really don't have a clue what biologists, botanists, medical researchers, etc., actually do. You really have no idea how the theory of evolution is applied, corroborated, critiqued, or expanded on, do you?

Tell you what, go to this site:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed

Just for the heck of it, plug the words "evolution mitochondria" into the search block. After reading the approximately 130 papers that pop up, you can then authoritatively point out to us all the philosophy, faith, belief, and pseudo-science you've unearthed.

And when you're done with that, plug the word "evolution" into the search block followed by the name of just about any old critter or plant you can imagine. Read the several thousand papers that pop up. Rinse, repeat.

549 posted on 09/14/2006 12:22:49 PM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Me thinks this article struck a nerve.


550 posted on 09/14/2006 12:24:39 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Our ancestors were once fish. Fish are not monkeys. A fur piece down the family tree, our ancestors were monkeys

Which little monkey are you related to? An African green monkey? Maybe you have green hair. An Indian macaque? Maybe you have a short little tail. A South American howler? I think that's the one -- you made me laugh.

551 posted on 09/14/2006 12:27:42 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (why is it so difficult to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
I'm astounded that this was somehow too complicated for you to figure out for yourself, because it's really freaking obvious.

Really freaking obvious placemarker!

552 posted on 09/14/2006 12:37:50 PM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is never better than knowledge. - Enrico Fermi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
Yes, mine, and countless scientists.

Yours, yes. Countless scientists, no. Truth is, the number of biological scientists that doubt the veracity of evolutionary theory is tiny, probably less than 1% in relevant fields (i.e. biology and geology). (e.g. survey of Ohio scientists

If evolution is a faith, it is the only 'faith' that produces hard predictions and evidence, like those mentioned in the link in my last post; it is a core part of any basic biology classroom curriculum. Audit a class at any local state university, if you don't believe me.

Like I said, creationists need to spend time in the audience of science before they can become speakers to the audience about what is 'good' and 'bad' science.

553 posted on 09/14/2006 12:38:48 PM PDT by Quark2005 ("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yellow, white.....aren't they "bright"? No attitude, please. It just seems a logical question.


554 posted on 09/14/2006 12:40:36 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Curious. Because if 1 hangs over the floor, 1 does not feel something pushing them.


555 posted on 09/14/2006 12:42:54 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Environmental pressure DOES NOT CAUSE changes in the genome.


Not specifically no, it does not cause the changes, but it allows the individuals with mutations that exist that are better able to survive that environmental change, to survive and pass on that trait to their progeny. The individuals that do not have the trait that allows their fellows to survive the climactic change will not survive, and therefore their traits will not be passed on.


556 posted on 09/14/2006 12:47:09 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

We now know you didn't get all your genes from your ancestors ~ or even from mutations.

Please, enlighten me on this discovery, I have not heard of it.

Please post a link to such a discovery, because it would be very important, to say the least.


557 posted on 09/14/2006 12:50:04 PM PDT by Jaguarbhzrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

>>Curious. Because if 1 hangs over the floor, 1 does not feel something pushing them.<<

Nor pulling. The pulling feeling is merely inference based on what you have lived with since you were born, and had explained to you since you were old enough to understand language.

When I ride my bike up a hill, I simply feel force. I honestly cannot feel whether it is pushing or pulling. One thing is for sure though: The harder I peddle, the more ALIVE I feel.


558 posted on 09/14/2006 12:53:28 PM PDT by RobRoy (Islam is more dangerous to the world now that Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Pretty strange, though, when 1 considers that bodies of mass are said to generate "MAGNETIC" forces. Which means things are being PULLED TO them. I.e., the mass is the 1 generating the force toward itself, not some other body - unseen - pushing away from itself, from who knows how far away!


559 posted on 09/14/2006 1:04:04 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
Lone Rangers of Science

Now that's a memorable phrase.

560 posted on 09/14/2006 1:05:06 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,061-1,070 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson