To: goldstategop
If he isnt on the ballot, they cant put someone else on. Thats what they did to Tom Delay and the Republicans.
The Republicans have to run as a write-in...
What the Rep's allowed with Lautenberg/Torricelli shouldnt be allowed again...
5 posted on
09/13/2006 6:05:29 AM PDT by
Former MSM Viewer
("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
To: Former MSM Viewer
Yes, they can and will. What's forbidden to Republicans is allowed to Democrats. New Jersey hasn't elected a GOP Senator since MASH was on the air.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
11 posted on
09/13/2006 6:08:34 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Former MSM Viewer
The Reps didn't allow it; the Supreme Kangaroo Court of the State of New Jersey did. (and they'll do it again for a democrat)
To: Former MSM Viewer
NJ isn't Texas.
They've already done it once and the NJ courts ruled it was ok.
26 posted on
09/13/2006 6:18:55 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: Former MSM Viewer
If he isnt on the ballot, they cant put someone else on. Thats what they did to Tom Delay and the Republicans. The Republicans have to run as a write-in...
What the Rep's allowed with Lautenberg/Torricelli shouldnt be allowed again...
Someone may already have noted this, but ... Delay was a Republican in Texas. This is about a democrat in NJ.
40 posted on
09/13/2006 7:48:47 AM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(Man, that's stupid...even by congressional standards.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson