Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What's even more shocking is how many times he contradicts himself in the span of those few minutes. He should really go back to sports anchoring. Politics are just too complicated for his neurotic little brain.
1 posted on 09/11/2006 8:43:45 PM PDT by itslex71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

.


2 posted on 09/11/2006 8:45:02 PM PDT by Mo1 (Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Wasn't he the most hated "man" in sports broadcasting?


3 posted on 09/11/2006 8:45:10 PM PDT by MarkeyD (The tree of liberty must from time to time be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71
He should really go back to sports anchoring.

He was bad at that too!

4 posted on 09/11/2006 8:45:39 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a Mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Honestly, who cares about this clown? I'll bookmark it to watch tomorrow but he is the definition of irrelevant.


5 posted on 09/11/2006 8:45:53 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Isn't he that conspsrazoid on MSNBC that thought Ohio was stolen, until it wasn't? LOL.

What a loon, how embarrassing for Dan Abrams.


7 posted on 09/11/2006 8:49:30 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Wow Keith definitely has his panties in a wad, he is now referencing "the Twilight Zone" in detail to claim BUSHCO™ manipulated it all.


9 posted on 09/11/2006 8:55:11 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

That guy is nuttier than squirrel turds.


10 posted on 09/11/2006 8:55:41 PM PDT by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

I can't stand that four-eyed, Marxist punk. Why do people who are Freepers even bother watching him?


11 posted on 09/11/2006 8:56:47 PM PDT by no dems ("25 homicides a day committed by Illegals" Ted Poe (R-TX) Houston Hearings 8/16/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

bookmarking for after p2911II.


15 posted on 09/11/2006 8:59:39 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Keith has got to be a psycho.


17 posted on 09/11/2006 9:01:59 PM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71
Keith lives in his own Twilight Zone of relevance. He is the reason O'Reilly mops the floor with him every night in the ratings.
19 posted on 09/11/2006 9:02:54 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

The man is an opporunitstic snob. Period.

As with most of his type, he is projecting on to Bush the type of person he, himself, is.


21 posted on 09/11/2006 9:03:32 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Was there a thread of reason in anything this puke said? What a retard.


22 posted on 09/11/2006 9:03:40 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

He's soft and has forgotten the lessons of what happened there. His glasses look silly, too.


25 posted on 09/11/2006 9:04:08 PM PDT by incredulous joe (“Whoever loveth me, loveth my hound” - St. Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

The man is definite a whacko. Why doesn't he lash out at the Clintoon? After all, the blood of those 300 people (plus the other victims in all the attacks leading up to 9/11) are on HIS hands. Clinton is the reason for 9/11. THAT is his legacy.

I will agree on one point however (and Geraldo made a similar comment on O'Reilly the other night). That is that the hole in lower Manhattan has been open for too long. If we were going to make a statement on our resilliency to the terrorists, we should at least be under construction by now.

But instead, it seems that it has been bogged down by the same bureaucratic gobbledy-goop that got us into trouble in the past. Only, Olbermann's contention that Bush is to blame for that too really shows his stupidity. The resurrection of Ground Zero is a local and state matter - not one that the President has any control over.


28 posted on 09/11/2006 9:06:15 PM PDT by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

Somehow I get the idea that he thinks the President was talking about him when he talks about people being soft. (smirk) Also someone should alert the poor sap that he himself is using the WTC as a prop. Talk about idiots,he are one.


30 posted on 09/11/2006 9:07:16 PM PDT by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

It's not unbelievable or shocking from him.
It is expected and par for the course.
In fact it is downright boring and thinking of it makes me yawn. I even feel stupid for wasting the time to talk about it, someone slap me. This fellow doesn't merit any more attention


37 posted on 09/11/2006 9:11:33 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71

It certainly is not a very professionally delivered editorial. He looses his cool too easily. He comes across as a petulant spoiled little kid whining about the others calling him names. Not as the informed, poised and intelligent journalist that he obviously thinks he is.

Usually, no one pays any attention to people like that.


41 posted on 09/11/2006 9:17:59 PM PDT by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71
Wow, he is nuts.

I think these Dems, they so loved Clinton with all their hearts, they just want revenge. They were so embarrassed after supporting him and kissing his rear, only then to find he was a rapist.

They blame us, the messenger, so Bush must pay with venomous attacks.

I say to Dems, Cheer up.Clinton did some wonderful things
by lowering the bar. Who knows, maybe Jim McGreevy can be president some day? Or maybe some pedophile can be on the next Democrat ticket?
43 posted on 09/11/2006 9:18:34 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: itslex71
He's in love with himself. Out of ideas, out of angles of attack, desperate, he's left clinging to blaming Bush for a whole in the ground. His arguments are presented in a self ingratiating fashion and they are not for from the absurdity which blamed Bush for the Tsunami. It's more blame Bush, blame Bush, blame Bush. Attack, attack, attack, and call him partisan. His tirade is BS wrapped in pretty words and repetitively presented. Trash-
44 posted on 09/11/2006 9:20:02 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson