Posted on 09/11/2006 2:02:14 PM PDT by mware
Edited on 09/11/2006 4:11:51 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
I will not be here for the first hour of tonights program. Thought I would put it up for those FReepers overseas that are viewing it now.
For those who wish to see the clips the Clinton lawyers complained about, Click here
I like this one:
http://www.entroporium.com/blogimages/bush-finger.jpg
I always find it interesting that the only one who ever takes him to task about that is John McLaughlin on "The McLaughlin Group." Nobody else cares to mention it.
the FBI sent a team led by John O’Neill who immediately suspected Israel.
%%%%
Did you really mean to write that?
Yes you are correct. Some elites I guess are allowed to do such things.
Not if Hilary gets elected.
Wikipedia states Bodine is back working at the State Dept. I wonder if she's been involved with the rest of the State Dept. traitors who continually stab the President in the back.
..and hopefully Madamn Albright's career also..
I don't think a president carries the nuclear football himself. A military attache does, right?
We'll have to disagree about that and I won't disrupt the thread.
I will say this however. I've lent Jayna's book The Third Terrorists to the very few Democrats in our area that I know.
They all hated the war in Iraq and thought I was nut about the OKC blast and McVeigh being helped in his efforts by an Iraqi.
After reading the book, every single one of them now supports the war because they realize that Iraq helped plan and commit the bombing at the Murrah building on Oklahoma.
Also, James Woolsey, Clinton's former CIA Director, said this about Jayna's research:
"When the full stories of these two incidents (1993 WTC Center bombing and 1995 Oklahoma City bombing) are finally told, those who permitted the investigations to stop short will owe big explanations to these two brave women (Middle East expert Laurie Mylroie and journalist Jayna Davis). And the nation will owe them a debt of gratitude."
- Former CIA Director James Woolsey,
Wall Street Journal, September 5, 2002
This is a GREAT SPEECH...and the libs and MSM can't say that Bush isn't getting the message across.
Right -- the money spent during Bush's first year was based on the last CLINTON budget. Bush's only way to effect how money was spent on terror in the first year was to push for a supplemental, something he would never get by the democrat Senate -- and he had election promises that had to be pushed through.
IN that context, Bush can be seen as continuing the Clinton policies for the first year, including keeping his own people, INCLUDING CLARKE. Bush was focused on the October, 2001 budget year, the one he was fighting through congress, the first one he would have a hand in shaping.
9/11 happened before he had a chance to exercise the monetary reins.
Why would Bush give money to the Taliban?
That is all BS.
If there is a rebuttal from the Democrats I am going to throw something.
There is no place for that today.
Good speech. Telling it like it is. Hopefully the networks will be smart and stand down from supporting partisan attacks by the lefties.
Never happen. She's too polarizing.
It looks like Heaton's portrayal is deadly accurate in showing Bodine as a class A1 bee-yitch.
And it also looks like all the women Clintonistas cover up their incompetence with ugly arrogance. Blech.
Half-bright and Bodine come off REALLY bad in this movie.
spitting nails and then some!
(S)the stress must have made clinton work his way through at least three interns since noon!(/s)
The president did well to point out that the Terrorists have attacked 2 dozen countrys.
They are the imperialist pricks!
Zawahiri called for attacks on Jordan and Suadi Arabia, Egypt and Israel today!
I fear for UAE and Oman and Kuwait.
The islamofascist are the enemy, the enemy of the world
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
