So, again, why did it take 5 freakin' yrs to dfo this? Why were we 'asking' permission from jihad central that also doubles as a rented client state that depends on our $$$ aid to stave off bankruptcy? And our support to escape the consequences of reckless nuke proliferation to confirmed rogue states? And escape the consequences of clandestine support for taliban and Al qaeda jihadists? etc etc etc
1 posted on
09/11/2006 5:30:00 AM PDT by
voletti
To: voletti
Find him and kill him, no trail.
2 posted on
09/11/2006 5:31:06 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: voletti
3 posted on
09/11/2006 5:34:28 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: voletti
It took five years for the old gray whore to learn of the operation and expose it. Keep in mind the OGW is our enemy ....not our friend.
4 posted on
09/11/2006 5:34:42 AM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: voletti
wanna catch UBL? Stop sharing infomation with the ISI
Doogle
5 posted on
09/11/2006 5:36:26 AM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF 69-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: voletti
Didn't the Gov't of Pakistan just make a peace deal with the tribes that not only prohibits Pakistani troops from entering these areas but the US also?
Need clarification because I'm not so sure what the truth is here.
To: voletti
I am just as frustrated as you that it took 5 years, but I think we have no idea how difficult this is for the Mussharif government. I think the locals, and maybe some of the Pakistani army supports bin Laddan and maintaining control is difficult. I think Mussharif has time and again put his life and his political rule on the line to assist us in the WOT.
7 posted on
09/11/2006 5:42:12 AM PDT by
Obadiah
To: voletti
I hear John Kerry will be leading the effort crossing national borders just like he did in Cambodia on Christmas 1968!
9 posted on
09/11/2006 5:42:44 AM PDT by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: voletti
10 posted on
09/11/2006 5:49:55 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
To: voletti
Translation, they know he is in Iran now.
16 posted on
09/11/2006 6:13:47 AM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: voletti
Definitely couldn't happen until Saddam was safely out of power, new government elected and Afghanistan with elected government in place.
These tribal leaders right;y suspect America's commitment to them personally. Money aside, their very lives are on the line each and every time they help as the extremist views of many surrounding them make their very survival tenuous, at best.
America has had a very bad track record with them, as was on display in the 9/11 docu-drama; first we support them, then we're not sure if we can hold up our end of the bargain.
Remember the Shiites and Kurds after Gulf I, they thought that they had our complete support to rise up against the Baathists, then "we" (cowards in high places) backed out of the deal.
17 posted on
09/11/2006 6:14:09 AM PDT by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: voletti
only a "SPECIAL UNIT"???
I would have thought at least an entire Division (3000-6000 men) would be deployed for that job!
To: voletti
I'm not sure OBL individually is that active or valuable anymore, but being able to get into Pakistan, unrestricted, and flush out the apparatus that is obviously still operating there is a major plus.
21 posted on
09/11/2006 6:37:23 AM PDT by
livius
To: voletti
So, again, why did it take 5 freakin' yrs to dfo this? Why were we 'asking' permission from jihad central that also doubles as a rented client state that depends on our $$$ aid to stave off bankruptcy?
Because we are the good guys.
As I said in another thread, in order to truly win this war on terror, which is, in effect, a war on an ideology, we would have to do a lot of things that would make many people very uncomfortable, including many Americans. It would include us having to ignore national boundaries, as our enemies do not care about national boundaries.
Because we are the good guys, we will never win this war - we will not do what is necessary, which is to eliminate that ideology anywhere it exists. Instead, because we are the good guys, we will allow other nations to harbor our enemies, because those nations are "allies". Nevermind that our enemies will use them to grow stronger.
To: voletti
Exactly. 5 years for Paki's permission.
And we know that elements of Paki military will continue to protect usama and muddy intel of his movements despite any words of "permission" given. In fact, I hate to say it, but perhaps our forces will be set up sometime soon.
27 posted on
09/12/2006 6:53:56 AM PDT by
Donna Lee Nardo
(DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
To: voletti
"So, again, why did it take 5 freakin' yrs to dfo this?"
Probably because of the repercussions to Musharrif should something happen.
This is why the RATS are a joke. They talk about how we should take our armies and hunt Bin Laden. If Binny baby was sitting in an open cafe in karachi with a sign over his head saying, "Binny" with an arrow pointed down, the RATS would have to stop at the Afghan border.
We will either get him if he is still alive. If he is alive, this morning he either made a beeline to Tehran or to a cave somewhere.
31 posted on
09/12/2006 7:16:52 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
("For seven million extra, we could have avoided a billion dollar WOT.")
To: Dog
32 posted on
09/12/2006 7:58:30 AM PDT by
Mo1
(Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
To: voletti
Bet they're going after those poor freedom fighters like Gingis Khan.
33 posted on
09/12/2006 8:10:14 AM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Democrats. French, but more cowardly.)
To: voletti
Hmmm....we get bin Laden on Halloween, MOONBATS go crazy.
34 posted on
09/12/2006 9:57:28 AM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson