Can the West defeat the Islamist threat? Here are ten reasons why not

Times Online ^ | September 09, 2006 | David Selbourne

[rodguy911]

Exactly! Just because some limp wrist Limey writes a piece on why the muzzies will conquer us is no reason to crawl under the bed.

Indeed all it does is piss us off and make us more determined!!

I swear much of the world really does not know who we really are! We are the United States of (insert your expletive) America, don't(insert still another expletive) with us!

[aquila48]

The islamic threat is the cancer of western civilzation. It is pernicious, not amenable to destruction by any of the high tech weapons we have. Its parasitic, virulent cells hide behind the tissues of society, sometimes feeding on it, other times blowing it up.

And just like it is taking a long time to eliminate cancer, so will it take a long time to eliminate the islamic threat... unless our body politics remains so unaware of its existence that it ends up killing us first.

[LZ_Bayonet]

"All the reason to use tactical nukes and end this crap once and for all."

A capability which the enemy recognizes. Hence, laying back until they also have the capability - then things really get rough.

[Twinkie]

.. Jokingly said, as I do agree with the one who posted above that the force of Christianity can overcome this terrorist threat; but not lip service Christianity, the kind that is not overcome by evil but overcomes evil with good.

[Cacique]

btt

[BW2221]

I agree Robert Spencer is a great man.

I think you're misinterpreting the article - you see It as defeatist and I see it is a call to action.

I am far morn concerned about Muslims taking over not as the result of war, but as a result of using democracy as a tool against us. If you look at the rate at which the Muslims are becoming a larger percentage of the problem in most European countries, if you look at how their young people become more radical generation after generation, while the governments of the west become more "compassionate" and politically correct, there is cause for concern.

[freedumb2003]

1) We're stupid
2) We're pansies
3) We (50% of us) hate Bush more than we love our children
4) Our need for self importance exceeds our need for security
5) We're lazy
6) We lack backbone
7) We lack the will to win
8) We're suicidal
9) We hate America
10) We hate ourselves

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

I ran across this site www.islamicfinder.org that someone posted on freerepublic.

I put in my zip and there are like THREE Muzzie orgs within 30 miles!

That was news to me!

Anyway I was reading one of their websites and sent them an email (from my anonymous account of course!) responding to some of their posted material:

"Americans seem shocked that anyone would not love America”

I would disagree. I would say that "Americans are shocked that anyone who dislikes America would choose to live here."

I would remind the devote practitioners of Islam that there are many places where people with similar feelings are. And I'd suggest that they move there!

I recently did exactly that coming from the Bay Area to Colorado Springs because I found that people here think much more like I do.

As a free county no one is forcing devote Muslims to remain in America.

I am much happier now that I am around people who think like I do!

You should try it and suggest it to all you know who feel that way!

A Person Interested in Helping Muslims Find the Peace They Desire....

[Dark Skies]

I really believe the only force powerful enough to defeat the corrosive power of Islam is Christianity.

Absolutely! Islam is the perversion of Judaism and Christianity.

However, I suggest its onslaught will strengthen Christianity and Judaism the way wrestling strengthens a wrestler or sparring improves a boxer. One other by product of the onslaught of islam...it unifies Christianity and Judaism into a single, solid force.

In the end, the best man will win. Will it be Mohammed...or Jesus? (purely rhetorical question so don't flame.)

[sageb1]

"if islam is so great how come they want to come to a Christian country???"

To make us submit to Allah's will.

[isthisnickcool]

Churchill was a damn genius. He wrote this while he was in his 20's:

How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities - but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.

—Sir Winston Churchill, from The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

[Chuck Dent]

My guess is siesta.

Well, that too - to sleep off a drunken night of revelry. Oops, muzzies don't allow alcohol; add that to the list: Imagine an honor society where they like their women sexy and their beer cold - now tell them they can't have it anymore.

You think the level of violence is high in Columbia & Brazil? I don't think I'd bet against the Latinos in a blood match against the Muzzies.

[IronJack]

This author, like so many alarmists, underestimates the resolve of the West, if not in its political institutions, at least in the will of the people themselves. Islam survives because we tolerate it. Pushed too far, our tolerance will dissolve. And then it is Islam that is doomed. Its backward, primitive, hate-filled legions are no match for a Western technological army committed to total victory.

All we're lacking now is the commitment, not the tools. One more 9/11 and the incentive will be there too. And then we can take out the trash for good.

[Peisistratus]

"(Heck, this level of moral treason goes above and beyond that of the ordinary DUmmie -- could he be Skinner? benburch? Will Pitt?)"

"Moral treason" is the State Department allowing in tens of thousands of Saudi "students".

"Bull$#!^."

It's a warning. Ignore it at your peril.

[Youngman442002]

Not only will the Muslim's use our media..but our lawyers too....we will be sued to submission...until the masses are willing to break the law and defend themselves....will we have a chance to survive...

[Peisistratus]

".until the masses are willing to break the law and defend themselves....will we have a chance to survive..."

At which point, our government will be on THEIR side. In fact, our governments are mostly on their side right now.

[truth_seeker]

"When we recognize there is a war we will pull the trigger,
the nuclear trigger. It will probably happen after a nuclear terrorist strike against this country or a European Country. The ability to drop several thousand thermonuclear weapons can have a very calming effect on the enemy."

So you expect we would go from one extreme of minimizing civilian deaths, to the other extreme of massive nuclear response.

I doubt that.

And we only used nukes ONCE, with very specific goals. It worked that one time, and has been HEAVILY debated since.

Not that I oppose use of nukes. But I expect the elites of power do.

The State Dept. probably has volumes on why not. And the military probably says: "WTF...let's do it."

[Youngman442002]

You are right..the first place the National guard will deployed will be to defend the mosques....after a big attack on the US....incredible huh?

[Peisistratus]

"You are right..the first place the National guard will deployed will be to defend the mosques....after a big attack on the US....incredible huh?"

Disgusting, is more like it. It's really hard to tell reality from the Onion these days. We allow more Muslims in. We IMPORT and subsidize Muslims from Russia and other countries with taxpayer money. At no point were any of us asked if we wanted to do this.

Our government takes from us and gives to our enemies. We the People are ignored, but taxed at the barrel of a gun to pay for those who want to kill us.

Fire EVERYONE at State. That SHOULD HAVE been Rice's first action, but instead we get more of the same.

[musicman]

"So you expect we would go from one extreme of minimizing civilian deaths, to the other extreme of massive nuclear response."

Ok...OK...Ok.....How about just ONE lil' ol' Ohio Class then???