Skip to comments.
Why NIST did not consider “controlled demolition” hypothesis of the World Trade Center Disaster
NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration. ^
| June 20, 2005
| NIST Investigating Staff
Posted on 09/08/2006 10:46:06 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: WmShirerAdmirer
Maybe they thought the question was about Waco.
To: WmShirerAdmirer
I used to tell my child that 'the road to hell is paved with what-ifs.' "But what if ... daddy?" "What if?"
22
posted on
09/08/2006 11:50:39 AM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: Incorrigible
Thank you, it'll be bookmarked.
To: WmShirerAdmirer
Why NIST did not consider “controlled demolition” hypothesis I think aliens did it. Why did NIST not consider the 'aliens did it' hypothesis???? Hmmmmm.
To: pabianice
Yer gonna need more foil than that!
25
posted on
09/08/2006 1:53:33 PM PDT
by
uglybiker
(Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
To: WmShirerAdmirer
26
posted on
09/08/2006 2:05:14 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
I used to tell my child that 'the road to hell is paved with what-ifs.' "But what if ... daddy?" "What if?"
Ask them, "What if there were no theoretical questions?"
27
posted on
09/08/2006 2:15:09 PM PDT
by
ricer1
To: ricer1
And your professional or educational background is...? There are stupid quesitons. I tested nuclear reactors (NS 0989-028-500)
28
posted on
09/08/2006 5:16:35 PM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: WmShirerAdmirer
I can't believe 38% of the 23,78 people think our Gov. would murder
I dont buy it. I dont know who exactly they polled. But no way do over a 3rd of this country think the govt was involved. This countyr hasnt sunk that far......yet
To: WmShirerAdmirer
You must remember that for 6 years now President Bush has been presented as the devil himself by the leftist media. I have never seen such vicious attacks on a President, even Nixon wasn't treated this badly. Stands to reason that people with little common sense or ability to think for themselves might believe such nonsense.
30
posted on
09/08/2006 5:24:31 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Leftists, the enemy within.)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
"And your professional or educational background is...? There are stupid quesitons. I tested nuclear reactors (NS 0989-028-500)"
Wow... please put your mental armament away and stop drinking double lattes!
The satire in my question must have been lost... So I should have used the /satire ending to my previous post.
31
posted on
09/11/2006 7:20:41 AM PDT
by
ricer1
To: ricer1
Humor has no place in public discouse where one cannot be sure of a common idiom with your audience. Just today I noticed a syndicated columnist decrying the common perception of your 'satire'. Satire is a most difficult mode to properly carry off, otherwise it is mere slapstick and vaudeville. Tagline...
32
posted on
09/11/2006 9:53:00 AM PDT
by
dhuffman@awod.com
(The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
To: dhuffman@awod.com
Then you'll never have an online discussion with me.
:>
33
posted on
09/11/2006 9:54:21 AM PDT
by
ricer1
To: dhuffman@awod.com
P.S., I wasn't kidding 'bout cutting back on the double lattes'.
34
posted on
09/11/2006 9:55:42 AM PDT
by
ricer1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson