Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why NIST did not consider “controlled demolition” hypothesis of the World Trade Center Disaster
NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration. ^ | June 20, 2005 | NIST Investigating Staff

Posted on 09/08/2006 10:46:06 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
"Do you believe any 9/11 conspiracy theories that indicate the U.S. government was involved?"

* 2378 responses

Yes, I believe there's evidence 38%

No, that's ridiculous 45%

I'm not sure 17%

I agree with Workerbeecitizen "I can't believe 38% of the 23,78 people think our Gov. would murder. Un-freakin believable!"

1 posted on 09/08/2006 10:46:09 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

"Involved" is such a fuzzy word. Plenty of libs would say the U.S. Government was involved because of our foreign policy, because the "bushies" are evil and are actually buddies with OBL, or the equally probable theory that GWB is an alien of some sort.


2 posted on 09/08/2006 10:51:12 AM PDT by jdsteel ('nuff said (old Marvel Comics reference....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer
Murder? Yes.

9-11? No fricken way...

3 posted on 09/08/2006 10:54:24 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Quam terribilis est haec hora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

The fact that NIST even had to answer these inane questions is absurd, as well as a complete waste of time and money.


4 posted on 09/08/2006 10:54:30 AM PDT by theanonymouslurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

Yes the government is complicit. The Clinton government. Bubba and his henchman allowed these monsters to think we are weak. So they kept coming at us.


5 posted on 09/08/2006 10:54:49 AM PDT by Stayingawayfromthedarkside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer
You don't think a man with a Hurricane machine, and Earthquake machine and the ability to travel back in time can't blow up a couple buildings in front of 100 million people?

Unbelieveable!

6 posted on 09/08/2006 10:54:53 AM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

My dopey brother thinks the collapse of the World Trade Center towers was the work of the government. He says it's all over the internet. I get very angry with him. The only time he was on the internet was when I sat him down at my computer and put him on an NFL site, and he had trouble manipulating the mouse. I think his bar buddies have fed him a heaping plate of bull crap.


7 posted on 09/08/2006 10:54:55 AM PDT by giznort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

8 posted on 09/08/2006 10:56:08 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer
Why NIST did not consider “controlled demolition” hypothesis of the World Trade Center Disaster

Uhhhmmm . . . because the hypothesis is stupid?

9 posted on 09/08/2006 10:59:54 AM PDT by Maceman (This is America. Why must we press "1" for English?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

The answers to these FAQs seem to be written in the tone of an annoyed teacher who has to explain a simple concept to a particularly dull student for the 814th time.


10 posted on 09/08/2006 11:02:01 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel
"Involved" is such a fuzzy word. Plenty of libs would say the U.S. Government was involved because of our foreign policy, because the "bushies" are evil and are actually buddies with OBL, or the equally probable theory that GWB is an alien of some sort.

Well, these are libs. These are the types of people that would treaten ABC with losing their broadcast liscence if they air the Path to 9/11. They see conspiracy by government everywhere because that is how they would operate the government. THank God libs aren't in office any more.

11 posted on 09/08/2006 11:10:12 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Something to keep for for the future!


12 posted on 09/08/2006 11:10:45 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giznort
Your reply was for me an "entertaining moment" in such a serious and critical lack of knowledge run rampant in this country.
13 posted on 09/08/2006 11:10:55 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: WmShirerAdmirer
Why NIST did not consider “controlled demolition” hypothesis of the World Trade Center Disaster?

Because they're not IDIOTS!

15 posted on 09/08/2006 11:15:01 AM PDT by gr8eman (Everybody is a rocket scientist...until launch day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: giznort
Is your dopey brother part German? Lots of Germans seem to believe the Govt theories...but then they're German.
16 posted on 09/08/2006 11:18:42 AM PDT by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions

Wonderful! Now, is there anything similar available regarding the Pentagon attack?

17 posted on 09/08/2006 11:22:47 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

Watch the towers collapse.

It starts from the top where the planes hit.


18 posted on 09/08/2006 11:24:46 AM PDT by airborne (Fecal matter is en route to fan! Contact is imminent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WmShirerAdmirer

bump for later...........


19 posted on 09/08/2006 11:26:28 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/pbpr.html

THE PENTAGON BUILDING PERFORMANCE REPORT

January 2003

Source: ttp://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

Homepage: http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/art017.html

(Note: Not all of the text or pictures are listed here.

ABSTRACT

Following the September 11 crash at the Pentagon of an airliner commandeered by terrorists, the American Society of Civil Engineers established a building performance study team to examine the damaged structure and make recommendations for the future. The members of the team reviewed available information on the structure and the crash loading and drew on focused assessments by others.

In addition to analyzing the essential features of column response to impact, they investigated the residual frame capacity and the structural response to the fire. Plausible mechanisms for the response of the structure to the crash were established. Recommendations are offered for future design and construction along with suggestions for research and development.

The material presented in this publication has been prepared in accordance with generally recognized engineering principles and practices, and is for general information only. This information should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application.

THE PENTAGON BUILDING PERFORMANCE REPORT AUTHORS

Paul F. Mlakar, Ph.D., P.E., Lead; Technical Director; U.S.Army Corps of Engineers

Donald O. Dusenberry, P.E.; Principal; Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc.

James R. Harris, Ph.D., P.E.; Principal; J.R. Harris & Company

Gerald Haynes, P.E.; Fire Protection Engineer; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms

Long T. Phan, Ph.D., P.E.; Research Structural Engineer; National Institute of Standards and Technology

Mete A. Sozen, Ph.D., S.E.; Kettelhut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering; Purdue University

TABLE OF CONTENTS...

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................1

20 posted on 09/08/2006 11:32:16 AM PDT by WmShirerAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson