Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC: 9/11 Program Criticism 'Premature'
AP ^ | 9/8/06

Posted on 09/08/2006 7:09:00 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside

Today: September 08, 2006 at 6:40:21 PDT

ABC: 9/11 Program Criticism 'Premature'

By DEEPTI HAJELA, ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW YORK (AP) -

ABC defended a miniseries on the events leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks after Clinton administration officials said it distorts history so drastically that it should be corrected or shelved.

"No one has seen the final version of the film, because the editing process is not yet complete, so criticisms of film specifics are premature and irresponsible," the network said in a statement Thursday.

Former administration officials and Senate Democrats said in letters to the head of the network's parent company that the "The Path to 9/11" was "terribly wrong."

Former President Clinton, speaking with news reporters after a Democratic fundraiser in Arkansas on Thursday, said he hadn't seen the ABC film.

"But I think they ought to tell the truth, particularly if they are going to claim it is based on the 9/11 Commission report," he said. "They shouldn't have scenes that are directly contradicted by the findings of the 9/11 report."

The Washington Post, citing a network executive it did not name, reported in its Friday editions that ABC plans to make minor changes in response to the complaints from former Clinton administration officials

The ABC executive said the "adjustments and refinements" are "intended to make clearer that it was general indecisiveness" by federal officials that left the country vulnerable to terrorist attacks, "not any one individual," the Post reported. It said the executive requested anonymity because the network is making only written comments.

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Clinton Foundation head Bruce Lindsey and Clinton adviser Douglas Band wrote in the past week to Robert Iger, CEO of ABC's parent, The Walt Disney Co., to express concern over "The Path to 9/11."

They were joined Thursday by Democratic Sens. Harry Reid of Nevada, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, Charles Schumer of New York and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, who sent a joint letter to Iger asking that the broadcast be cancelled.

The two-part miniseries, scheduled to be broadcast on Sunday and Monday, is drawn from interviews and documents including the report of the Sept. 11 commission.

Thomas Kean, a former Republican New Jersey governor and chairman of the 9/11 Commission, defended the program.

"It's something the American people should see," he said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America" Friday. "Because you understand how these people wanted to do us harm, developed this plot, and how the machinations of the American government under two administrations not only failed to stop them, but even failed to slow them down."

Kean said he hoped people would watch the miniseries to "understand better what went on, and hopefully understand what still needs to be done."

The letter writers said the miniseries contained factual errors and that their requests to see it had gone unanswered. They said people familiar with the movie had told them about it, but they didn't name them.

"By ABC's own standard, ABC has gotten it terribly wrong," Lindsey and Band said in their letter. "It is unconscionable to mislead the American public about one of the most horrendous tragedies our country has ever known."

ABC said that for dramatic and narrative purposes "the movie contains fictionalized scenes, composite and representative characters and dialogue and time compression."

"We hope viewers will watch the entire broadcast of the finished film before forming an opinion about it," ABC said.

In the senators' letter, they questioned the political leanings behind the miniseries.

"Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings," the letter said.

The letter writers pointed out examples of scenes they had been told were in the miniseries but that they said never happened. Albright objected to a scene that she was told showed her insisting on warning the Pakistani government before an airstrike on Afghanistan, and that showed her as the one who made the warning.

"The scene as explained to me is false and defamatory," she said.

Berger objected to a scene that he was told showed him refusing to authorize an attack on Osama bin Laden despite the request from CIA officials.

"The fabrication of this scene (of such apparent magnitude) cannot be justified under any reasonable definition of dramatic license," he wrote.

The five-hour miniseries is set to run without commercial interruption. Director David Cunningham said it was a massive undertaking, with close to 250 speaking parts, more than 300 sets and a budget of $40 million. Cunningham has said he shot 550 hours of film. The cast includes Harvey Keitel, Patricia Heaton and Donnie Wahlberg.

---

Associated Press writer Devlin Barrett in Washington, AP Television Writer Frazier Moore in New York and AP writer Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Ark., contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aretherenomenleft; pathto911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2006 7:09:00 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

"No one has seen the final version of the film, because the editing process is not yet complete, so criticisms of film specifics are premature and irresponsible."

Then what's all the belly-aching about?


2 posted on 09/08/2006 7:10:31 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (See Rock City)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

This would indicate they are not caving to the Dems and cancelling the movie.


3 posted on 09/08/2006 7:11:29 AM PDT by veronica (NEW LITERARY AND ARTS JOURNAL offers free advertising for writers, bloggers, artists. FRmail me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
"They shouldn't have scenes that are directly contradicted by the findings of the 9/11 report."

I agree with him there; they shouldn't. No evidence to date that they have such a thing though...and it will be easy enough to prove either way.
4 posted on 09/08/2006 7:11:54 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
"No one has seen the final version of the film, because the editing process is not yet complete, so criticisms of film specifics are premature and irresponsible," the network said in a statement Thursday.

Translation: "Wait! We're not done watering this thing down yet. When it actually airs, 9/11 will be George W. Bush's fault and it will be clear that only Hillary Clinton can lead our country in the future. If you think you're mad now, just wait!"

5 posted on 09/08/2006 7:15:11 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
"They shouldn't have scenes that are directly contradicted by the findings of the 9/11 report."

Yeah, like the finding that Jamie Gorelick's iron wall of silence did not contribute to 9/11. The 9/11 commission was a sick joke.

6 posted on 09/08/2006 7:16:38 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Yeah, like the finding that Jamie Gorelick's iron wall of silence did not contribute to 9/11.

That was not a finding of the Report. In fact, one of the recommendations of the Commission that was addressed in the Patriot Act dealt with the wall. If you load the Report in Acrobat and search for the term 'the wall' you will see what I mean.
7 posted on 09/08/2006 7:18:55 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I made my statement already. I had it setup for Tivo'ing. Tivo uses its information as an ratings tool. I deleted that last night. I will watch part 1 bypassing Tivo and if it is a snow job, there will be no part 2.


8 posted on 09/08/2006 7:22:39 AM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Premature= ABC is caving.

I would pay money for the UNCENSORED "path to 9/11" documentary.


This is the censored version so now we get to watch this wondering what they DID take out.

Are there work edits out in distribution?

FNC said they HAD a copy of this documentary. (unfinished?)


9 posted on 09/08/2006 7:23:19 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

ABC speak....."Wait...we have blamed BUSH for everything in the final cut'!!


10 posted on 09/08/2006 7:27:57 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

These Congressional "Leaders" who wrote this letter to ABC is attempting to intimidate ABC/Disney and is in violation of the Constitution by using their positions in an attempt to restrict free speech.


11 posted on 09/08/2006 7:32:14 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Premature because they are criticising a version of the movie that is unlikely to be shown. This will probably be a tremendous bait-and-switch.


12 posted on 09/08/2006 7:39:03 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
That was not a finding of the Report...

Not in so many words, but Jamie Gorelick played a central role in the strengthening and expansion of "The Wall" in order to help Clinton in the ChinaGate affair. That fact, combined with her membership in the commission itself makes the commission's treatment of the subject feeble at best.

The Writing on "The Wall"

13 posted on 09/08/2006 7:41:01 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

what's all the belly-aching about?


It's about the very real tarnish on Clinton's legacy and this docudrama isn't spinning the story he wants!


14 posted on 09/08/2006 7:41:18 AM PDT by chgomac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I'll bet good money they show up on youtube.com!

I rarely watch the dinosaur channels anyway anymore, if ABC caves to the dems on this, that will be the final straw for me. I'll stick to getting my news from talk radio and FR, thankyouverymuch!!


15 posted on 09/08/2006 7:44:08 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TChris
Not in so many words, but Jamie Gorelick played a central role in the strengthening and expansion of "The Wall"

The Report does attribute the creation of 'the wall' to her, notes that she will not have input into the parts of the Report that concern 'the wall' because of her involvement, and then goes on to cover the hell 'the wall' created...some of which gets absolutely comical if you can forget how many died because of it.
16 posted on 09/08/2006 7:55:02 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P-40
The Report does attribute the creation of 'the wall' to her...

Hmm... Looking at page 79 and 80 of the report, they do mention Jamie Gorelick in passing, but they seem to describe "The Wall" as "misunderstanding" combined with a power grab by the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review. I always believed it to be a much more intentional blockade at the behest of the Clinton Whitehouse.

But, I suppose I'm foolish to believe the commission would come out and say that.

17 posted on 09/08/2006 8:07:04 AM PDT by TChris (Banning DDT wasn't about birds. It was about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TChris
they do mention Jamie Gorelick in passing, but they seem to describe "The Wall" as "misunderstanding"

Yeah, they did not go out of their way to say Gorelick is a nutjob...but I bet they were thinking it. :)

They do give Gorelick her 'pass' with that misunderstanding statement...but I guess that was her statement and they let her statement stand for the record. I guess they would have been accused of being partial if they had tried to say much more.

I hope the mini-series includes the scenes of the FBI agents discussing, in the context of 'the wall' and before 9/11, planes flying into the World Trade Center.
18 posted on 09/08/2006 8:14:43 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
(Palladino & Pellicano... Call Your Office.)
19 posted on 09/08/2006 8:22:54 AM PDT by End_Clintonism_Now (MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL CLINTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

Me thinks they doth protest too much. They're afraid the American people will find out the truth about the Clinton administration, and will open some eyes to the fact that they did nothing, when they should have done something.


20 posted on 09/08/2006 8:56:41 AM PDT by Not just another dumb blonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson