Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC to Alter Show on Pre-9/11 Run-Up
The Washington Post ^ | September 8, 2006 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 09/08/2006 5:44:59 AM PDT by TaxachusettsMan

ABC plans to make minor changes to its docudrama on the run-up to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in response to heated complaints from former Clinton administration officials that a number of scenes are fabricated, a network executive said yesterday . . .

The ABC executive said the "adjustments and refinements" are "intended to make clearer that it was general indecisiveness" by federal officials that left the country vulnerable to terrorist attacks, "not any one individual." The executive, who requested anonymity because the network is making only written comments, said small revisions have been underway for weeks.

The network's move came as the children's publishing company Scholastic deleted from its Web site materials about "The Path to 9/11," developed in partnership with ABC, that were being offered to 25,000 high school teachers. "We determined that the materials did not meet our high standards for dealing with controversial issues," Chairman Dick Robinson said.

Democrats ratcheted up the pressure yesterday. Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) and four Democratic colleagues wrote to Robert Iger, chief executive of the Walt Disney Co., ABC's corporate parent, urging him to cancel the movie. The Democratic National Committee obtained more than 100,000 signatures on a petition demanding cancellation. Jay Carson, a spokesman for former president Bill Clinton, called ABC's plan to air the movie "despicable."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aretherenomenleft; censorship; clintonlegacyoflies; intimidation; pathto911; scholastic; wob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
"We determined that the materials did not meet our high standards for dealing with controversial issues," [Scholastic] Chairman Dick Robinson said.

Translation: "The inconvenient truth about 9/11 makes the National Teachers' and Academics' Party, i.e. the Democrats, look like the wussies they are, offends the Almighty Teachers' Union, might make the children we are trying to indoctrinate more conservative, or - even worse - PATRIOTIC!"

Thank God the integrity of the American School System is being maintained for yet another academic year!

1 posted on 09/08/2006 5:45:00 AM PDT by TaxachusettsMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

Before getting totaly out of sorts we should recall that Rush and others have a copy of the original. If there are cuts, the fact they were cut and the scenes cut will be well known and widely discussed.

There is a good possibility that cut scenes will receive more attention when cut than when in the movie. It's possible to missthem in the total movie viewing but when held out alone for discussion can't be missed.

The process may end up being worse for the Rats thn if they left it alone.


2 posted on 09/08/2006 5:49:28 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. We will screw you inshallah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan
Look at this link to see what the dems are up to on this.
http://reid.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&&year=2006&

This is censorship pure and simple. The signatories to this letter should all face impeachment hearings for violating their oath to uphold the US Constitution. Our elected boneheads should not be in the business of censoring any media outlet.
I wrote an email to Reid expressing my disgust with their actions. (not that he cares).
3 posted on 09/08/2006 5:49:38 AM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: TaxachusettsMan

Nat'l security puts the dems back on their heels.


5 posted on 09/08/2006 5:50:17 AM PDT by Huck (There is a $2.00 service charge for this tagline---do you still wish to proceed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

6 posted on 09/08/2006 5:51:27 AM PDT by petercooper (Is this where I get me a huntin' license?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

I REALLY want to see the original study guide. I looked around last night, found nothing. Anyone?


7 posted on 09/08/2006 5:51:58 AM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan
Hey we all knew that ABC would cave in to Clinton it was just a question of how far.

I'm betting that the chances of this being pulled altogether are at least 50-50.

8 posted on 09/08/2006 5:52:22 AM PDT by An Old Marine (Freedom isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan
THE REAL DEAL:

PARTIAL LIST OF TERRORIST ACTIVITIES IGNORED BY McCARTHY, GORELICK, CLARKE and CLINTON,
WHO ARE AMERICAN ENABLERS OF TERRORISM WHICH MURDERS INNOCENT AMERICANS

1993 Attempted Assassination of Pres. Bush Sr., April 14,1993
1993 First World Trade Center bombing, February 26th, 7 Killed, Hundreds injured, Billions
1995 Attack on US Diplomats in Pakistan, Mar 8,1995
1996 Khobar Towers attack
1998 U.S. Embassy Bombing in Peru, Jan 15, 1998
1998 U.S. Kenya Embassy blown up, 100's murdered
1998 U.S. Tanzania Embassy blown up, 100's murdered
1999 Plot to blow up Space Needle (thwarted)
2000 USS Cole attacked, many U.S. Navy sailors murdered

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1117579/posts
GORELICK GATE - various FR links




Consider: If Gorelick, Clarke and Clinton had been completely HONEST
to the American public about the Islamic-crashed airplanes, like TWA800, in the 90's
or the other Islamic terror attacks, then Americans WOULD have been on alert on 911
and would have had the opportunity to prevent the 911 Atrocities.


FLASHBACK:

Who's Who on the 9/11 "Independent" Commission

"According to a 1998 Senate testimony of former CIA director James
Woolsey, powerful financier Khalid bin Mahfouz’ younger sister is
married to Osama bin Laden,. (US Senate, Senate Judiciary
Committee, Federal News Service, 3 Sept. 1998, See also Wayne
Madsen, Questionable Ties, In These Times,12 Nov. 2001 )
Bin Mahfouz is suspected to have funneled millions of dollars to the Al
Qaeda network.(See Tom Flocco, Scoop.co.nz 28 Aug. 2002)
Now, "by sheer coincidence", former New Jersey governor Thomas


Kean has business ties with bin Mahfouz and Al-Amoudi.
Thomas Kean is a director (and shareholder) of Amerada Hess
Corporation , which is involved in the Hess-Delta joint venture with
Delta Oil of Saudi Arabia (owned by the bin Mahfouz and Al-Amoudi
clans)...
Now you would think that being a business partner of the brother in
law and alleged financier of "Enemy No. 1" would also be considered a
bona fide "conflict of interest", particularly when your mandate --as
part of the 9/11 Commission's work-- is to investigate "Enemy No. 1".
"(Michel Chossudovsky, New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had
business ties with Osama's Brother in Law,
Centre for Research on Globalization, December 2002 )


9 posted on 09/08/2006 5:52:29 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

dems are practicing censorship....be afraid...be very afraid.....


10 posted on 09/08/2006 5:52:54 AM PDT by auto power
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan
I personally believe that the parts being cut out are true!!!

People are afraid to state the truth....the 911 comm was a total joke.The Republicans on the comm where really democrats,even Kane.

Moderate Republicans (what is it you are moderate about) Moderate means you don't stand for anything IMHO.

Chris Wallace on Fox just stated that the Clintons are right to be upset, because the parts in the movie that they want out, are clearly untrue.
11 posted on 09/08/2006 5:54:35 AM PDT by thepresidentsbestfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
Whatever ABC does to alter the production will be discussed, BIG TIME, in the alternative media AND FNC.

Most of us have seen and heard the tapes of bubba admitting he could have and didn't capture OBL

12 posted on 09/08/2006 5:59:33 AM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: auto power

I'M just surprised a movie like this was even considered let alone authorized by the powers that be at al-ABC. Imagine even considering putting KLIN-TON & subjects to scrutiny is heresy in the LIBERALS' world. 'Off with their heads', Hitlery would say!


13 posted on 09/08/2006 6:00:48 AM PDT by Jazzman1 (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jazzman1

Move it to FOX


14 posted on 09/08/2006 6:01:29 AM PDT by petercooper (Is this where I get me a huntin' license?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
Hey we all knew that ABC would cave in to Clinton it was just a question of how far.

By Monday, clintoon will have personally killed bin laden and all the hijackers and 911 will not have happened.

(Thank God Rush has an original copy.)

15 posted on 09/08/2006 6:02:38 AM PDT by CPOSharky (Methinks the demonrats doth protest too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

I had suspected this thing would get changed in all the important places. I am sure there are no actual changes, that there were multiple versions of each scene shot and one set got prescreened to certain lefties and to Limbaugh. Limbaugh was favorably impressed and the lefties screamed as they were intended to do, so the other, preapproved version will actually be shown, but in the meantime, lots of conservatives will tune in and give them great big ratings and the lefty show will be adjudged a terrific success at showing the approved "truth." When Limbaugh cries "foul" he will be accused of hypocrisy because he had liked it before airing.


16 posted on 09/08/2006 6:03:27 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine
I agree.

After all, ABC 'is' (no matter how you define the word, is) the MSM. They are also in bed with the Hollywood elite, the far-left, the democrats and liberal intelligensia.

They are not about to sever or harm their ties to those groups--or make any big waves that could damage their liberal leanings.

17 posted on 09/08/2006 6:07:00 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaxachusettsMan

Cowardice, Thy name is ABC


18 posted on 09/08/2006 6:07:39 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

That's a very good idea.
FOX should contact the producers and get permission to air it. They could advertise that they intend to show the movie in it's original entirety next weekend.
btw - one of the producers is Iranian. He was on Hugh Hewitt's show yesterday.


19 posted on 09/08/2006 6:09:55 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Bump!


20 posted on 09/08/2006 6:12:31 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson