Skip to comments.
THE PATH TO 911 Bootlegs Hit the Overseas Markets
Macsmind ^
| September 7th, 2006
| MacRanger
Posted on 09/07/2006 8:47:36 PM PDT by shield
UPDATE: Looks like Bill is going to need a case of Pepto, email from overseas, guess what bootleg movie is showing up? Told you, cant stop the flood. Look for the Berger Cuts to show up on You Tube any day now.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 911; bootleg; canttaketheheat; crazydimwits; d; dimwitaholes; dimwitslose; dimwitstoast; liars; lookatmeimatripod; nuts; pathto911; putsomeiceonit; ratslose; ratsratsrats; sorelosers; theirallassholes; thepathto911; thosedirtyrats; yesfoffdems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 next last
To: ohioWfan
I read that hastily, but still only see this:
UPDATE: Looks like Bill is going to need a case of Pepto, email from overseas, guess what bootleg movie is showing up? Told you, cant stop the flood. Look for the Berger Cuts to show up on You Tube any day now.
Reliable e-mail from overseas?
141
posted on
09/08/2006 7:27:22 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: shield
Excellent, I was hoping YouTube would get to it.
To: Howlin
I cannot help but think something is about to break wide open.
To: STARWISE
The ABC executive said the "adjustments and refinements" are "intended to make clearer that it was general indecisiveness" by federal officials that left the country vulnerable to terrorist attacks, "not any one individual." Bullshit...
To: onyx
Hmmmmm.........good question, onyx.
Guess we'll have to wait and see if it's the real thing.
145
posted on
09/08/2006 7:52:25 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(George W. Bush - "Take his character all together, and we shall not look upon his like again.")
To: ohioWfan
I've asked my daughter to check the island's bootleg outlet. She doesn't think they carry made for tv movies.
147
posted on
09/08/2006 7:57:10 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: onyx
Good.
It's been brought up that both Rush and Hugh Hewitt have complete copies of the film.
One way or t'other we're going to be able to find out the details of this film, and most likely see it.
148
posted on
09/08/2006 8:06:53 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(George W. Bush - "Take his character all together, and we shall not look upon his like again.")
To: ohioWfan
YES! I've seen it posted that Rush has viewed the original, but ABC continues to insist that nobody has seen it and thusly, cannot rightfully complain about the content.
Color me totally confused.
149
posted on
09/08/2006 8:12:31 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: Howlin; onyx
Why are they SO intense about this????? Something BIG is going on here.
And
Their reaction is just amazing.
Over kill. Why, I wonder?
Okay, you two.... (just kidding).
It is because this is an issue that transcends everything. It has the potential to be the poison quill in Clinton's legacy. His sexual daliances and subsequent perjury took first-order over national security. It also reveals that he was more interested in maintaining his peacetime facade.
It transcends the mid-term elections. It shows that the Democrat poster boy captained a ship of fools in his administration. Sandy Berger, Madeline Albright, etc. It reveals the weakness and selfishness of the Democrats saving the Clinton Presidency from impeachment at any cost. It places the appeasement of Kim Jong-il in a whole new light, doesn't it? If it were to reach "critical mass" in the media - the incompetence revealed in this issue would cause all scales will tilt against the democrats, and they know it.
And, finally, there is the 2008 election and Hillary. What else needs to be said there?
This issue has the potential to finally reveal the Clintons as the narcissic, self-serving people they are - along with their enablers that place the country in harm's way.
Lando
150
posted on
09/08/2006 8:14:10 AM PDT
by
Lando Lincoln
(For what cause would a liberal go to war? Revolutions don't count.)
To: shield
Censorship just doesn't work in the information age
:D
151
posted on
09/08/2006 8:14:17 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(http://blackwellvstrickland.blogspot.com "Go Blackwell, defeat Taxin Ted ")
To: Lando Lincoln
Excellent, LL! You're right.
152
posted on
09/08/2006 8:16:41 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: Lando Lincoln
I actually think the opposite could be in the works.If the dems spin this right,they could conclude that Clinton couldn't get Bin Laden because the Republicans were more interested in his sex life than they were national security.Hence,Clinton was bogged down by impeachment hearings,etc.,,
153
posted on
09/08/2006 8:21:44 AM PDT
by
quack
To: onyx
The stakes couldn't be higher for the democrats and "the Legacy".
Thanks for the compliment - and, I hope you are well.
Lando
154
posted on
09/08/2006 8:22:52 AM PDT
by
Lando Lincoln
(For what cause would a liberal go to war? Revolutions don't count.)
To: shield
Thank God for that! Reminds me of the Swift Boat video and the Democratic reaction to that.
Carolyn
155
posted on
09/08/2006 8:24:47 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: quack
"Hence,Clinton was bogged down by impeachment hearings,etc.,,"
Some of the Democrats have been saying that since Clinton left office. Can't think of any specific names at the moment, but I've heard it more than once.
carolyn
156
posted on
09/08/2006 8:27:09 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: quack
That would be immeasurably risky. The President's first order of business - regardless of the distraction - is national security. And, it would be an admission of fault. If the dems take that tack, it will be a desparate act.
Lando
157
posted on
09/08/2006 8:27:30 AM PDT
by
Lando Lincoln
(For what cause would a liberal go to war? Revolutions don't count.)
To: shield
bump .... NEVER distribute ANY video that you do not mind eventually seeing released to the internet.
158
posted on
09/08/2006 8:31:11 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Property tax is feudalism. Income taxes are armed robbery of the minority by the majority.)
To: onyx
Reliable e-mail from overseas? That's a question for Mac...go to his site and ask him.
159
posted on
09/08/2006 8:44:25 AM PDT
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: shield
160
posted on
09/08/2006 8:48:01 AM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson