Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/07/2006 8:17:33 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: presidio9

Why?

Case #1 : The movie is factual, and the truth hurts.

Case #2 : The movie is fictional, and they want to protect their monopoly on fictional documentaries,


2 posted on 09/07/2006 8:20:14 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Umm, perhaps because it tells the TRUTH?

If there's one thing we know for sure, it is that the political left is deathly-allergic to truth.


3 posted on 09/07/2006 8:20:55 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

5 posted on 09/07/2006 8:21:38 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Wow! ABC telling the truth? What happened?


6 posted on 09/07/2006 8:21:45 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Um.. because it peels off the layers of willful disregard and denial of the facts and shows their "new messiah" and his minions of evil in their true light?
7 posted on 09/07/2006 8:22:03 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This cracks me up...

The so-called "right-wing" producer of "Path to 9/11" is a guy named Marc E. Platt.

If you look at his campaign contibutions, you see that he is clearly a card-carrying liberal.

He even donated $1000 to Bill Clinton in '92.

8 posted on 09/07/2006 8:24:34 AM PDT by dollar_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

It's an election year and there isn't enough time to spin the film sufficiently before November.


9 posted on 09/07/2006 8:24:42 AM PDT by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

They are pro-choice, they want it aborted.


10 posted on 09/07/2006 8:25:34 AM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy is still an enemy.......war has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
They are trying to discredit it because it tarnishes the legacy (as if it could be tarnished any more than it has already) of their godlike, hero--Slick.

They are afraid that the documentary will ask "Why did Clinton not accept Osama when Sudan offerred the US Osama THREE TIMES"?

Anything that might show how Slick damaged our military and our national security by his reckless disregard for both--drives the Clinton apologists absolutely livid--and they revert to their rapid, feral, and unconditional devotion and loudly vocal defense of Slick.

11 posted on 09/07/2006 8:25:45 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Why Does the Left Hate "The Path to 9/11"?

In the words of fictitious Col. Nathan R. Jessup, "You can't handle the truth!"

12 posted on 09/07/2006 8:25:53 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Have we seen any of the hollywood types coming out to defend freedom of speech? If so, I want names.


13 posted on 09/07/2006 8:27:49 AM PDT by feedback doctor (HATE - The core value of liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Hope the producers don't get "Arkancided".
14 posted on 09/07/2006 8:28:00 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Why Does the Left Hate "The Path to 9/11"?

The truth hurts!

15 posted on 09/07/2006 8:28:23 AM PDT by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Dem since 2001 *Folding@Home for the Gipper - Join the FReeper Folders*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

...represented chiefly in the person of FBI Agent John O'Neill, played by Harvey Keitel...

______

Harvey's a Pubbie, I believe.


16 posted on 09/07/2006 8:29:02 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
By attempting a programming coup against the series, the Clinton forces have brought enormous attention to the film, and for that I thank them.

I feel exactly the same way. For once, I am grateful for the actions of the Impeached Rapist and his goons.

17 posted on 09/07/2006 8:29:32 AM PDT by Coop (...one of the best things we can do for the troops is to boot Cut'n'run Murtha!! -- JimRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

If it follows the 9/11 commission report, then it loses signifcant value. Jamie Gorelick is a significant cause of 9/11.

Nevertheless, to use a liberal phrase, the show will "increase awareness" of Islamofacism and that the war on terror is a real war, not a military expedition.


18 posted on 09/07/2006 8:30:36 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
A list of the requested, make that demanded, edits would be highly instructive. I hope that gets released as well!
20 posted on 09/07/2006 8:32:45 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

Will it show Clinton appointee Mary Jo Whites memo though?????

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/005241.php

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton's team ignored dire warnings that its approach to terrorism was "very dangerous" and could have "deadly results," according to a blistering memo just obtained by The Post. ...
"This is not an area where it is safe or prudent to build unnecessary walls or to compartmentalize our knowledge of any possible players, plans or activities," wrote White, herself a Clinton appointee.

"The single biggest mistake we can make in attempting to combat terrorism is to insulate the criminal side of the house from the intelligence side of the house, unless such insulation is absolutely necessary. Excessive conservatism . . . can have deadly results."

She added: "We must face the reality that the way we are proceeding now is inherently and in actuality very dangerous."


21 posted on 09/07/2006 8:32:52 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
There is, by the way, zero mention in the fve hours of the allegations that Clinton let bin Laden slip through his fingers when the terror chief was offered up by Sudan. There is no Atta meeting in Prague, no suggestion of a Saddam history of terror ties unrelated to 9/11 --

Well, that's a darned shame. But I'll plan to watch it anyway, if I can.

23 posted on 09/07/2006 8:33:09 AM PDT by Coop (...one of the best things we can do for the troops is to boot Cut'n'run Murtha!! -- JimRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I like many Americans would have probably not watched this show. But now I plan to record it on my DVR so that I can watch at my liesure.


24 posted on 09/07/2006 8:33:44 AM PDT by BubbaBobTX (I wasn't born in Texas but I got here as fast as I could.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson