Skip to comments.
'Sexual indoctrination' bill vetoed ( by Arnold )
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com ^
| 9/6/06
| © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted on 09/06/2006 4:34:07 PM PDT by RS
The bill vetoed today was SB 1437, which had been approved by the Legislature. It would have prevented any school teaching materials or activities from "reflecting adversely" upon homosexuals, bisexuals or transgenders.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; arnoldvetoes; california; gay; homosexualagenda; sb1437; sb1441; schwarzenegger; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
ANOTHER good veto of a bill that his opponant would sign if he is allowed to win in November. ANOTHER good reason to vote for Arnold again.
1
posted on
09/06/2006 4:34:09 PM PDT
by
RS
To: RS
Good job Arnold. Now all the people who hate him will explain how this doesn't matter and anyway this is exactly what Angelides would have done.
2
posted on
09/06/2006 4:35:25 PM PDT
by
mhx
To: FairOpinion
3
posted on
09/06/2006 4:37:05 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: mhx
Is that Team Arnoldspeak?
injecting words like hate and such,, tsk tsk.
We won't discuss all the past and future legislation he already has signed and will sign in the future or his staff composition.
4
posted on
09/06/2006 4:39:10 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: mhx
5
posted on
09/06/2006 4:39:54 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FairOpinion
a convenient excerptation eh, FO?
, uhh, paragraph 2
--
"California families recognize this bill was an attack on religious freedoms in school," said Karen England, executive director of the Capitol Resource Institute, after the announcement today. "There are still several other bills on the governor's desk that also deserve his veto."
6
posted on
09/06/2006 4:41:09 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: RS
Arnold isn't great, but he's light years better than the alternative.
7
posted on
09/06/2006 4:41:18 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: NormsRevenge
You realize of course that your fingers won't fall off if you actually wrote that you agreed with the veto and are happy he killed this ...
8
posted on
09/06/2006 4:43:35 PM PDT
by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: NormsRevenge
...We won't discuss all the past and future legislation he already has signed and will sign in the future or his staff composition.You won't? Ilk will discuss anything to rile and divide the base.
9
posted on
09/06/2006 4:43:56 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: RS
California is the one and only state to ban the .50.
To: RS
11
posted on
09/06/2006 4:45:08 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: RS
Thank The Lord...when I heard about this bill I cringed...I sure hope he vetos that bill about financial aid for illegals...
12
posted on
09/06/2006 4:45:11 PM PDT
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: NormsRevenge
"There are still several other bills on the governor's desk that also deserve his veto."
So what's your take ... would you be happy and believe he did the right thing if he vetos them, or be upset that you have lost another chance to attack him ?
13
posted on
09/06/2006 4:46:20 PM PDT
by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: RS
I haven't been a big fan, but give him credit here for a job well done.
14
posted on
09/06/2006 4:46:23 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Newt '08!)
To: RS
'Sexual indoctrination' bill Poor title. Correct title would be something like "Homosexual Indoctrination Of Children Bill...","Anti-Marriage Bill...", or "Hate Normal Families Bill..."
15
posted on
09/06/2006 4:47:56 PM PDT
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: RS
Oh, sorry to deprive you all of a victory lap.
Just find it funny with the excerpt and all.
There is some meat further on in the article re sb 1441 and such that might interest others here as well.
It's OK, I have to go to a wake in a few minutes, (No, not mine, I can imagine the glee some of you here would express were that the case.) ;-)
16
posted on
09/06/2006 4:48:01 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: 68 grunt
Yeah, you're such a great uniter. ;-)
17
posted on
09/06/2006 4:48:36 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
To: RS
You mean we can't say mean things about bone smugglers, butt pirates, muff divers, rump rangers, switch hitters, peter puffers, carpet munchers, or Hillary Clinton?
18
posted on
09/06/2006 4:48:55 PM PDT
by
quark
To: Michael Goldsberry
Yep - we have quite a few dumb laws out here - with the legislature and the amount of idiot voters we have, we should be happy when someone actually stops a few.
His opponant this November would have signed them.
19
posted on
09/06/2006 4:49:12 PM PDT
by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: RS
Wow! As far as I know he hadn't said beforehand whether he would veto this or not? What a relief.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson