Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain covered up WW2 "plot" to kill Polish PM
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^ | Mon Sep 4, 2006 | Peter Griffiths

Posted on 09/04/2006 10:38:13 AM PDT by lizol

Britain covered up WW2 "plot" to kill Polish PM

By Peter Griffiths

Mon Sep 4, 2:00 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - A distinguished Polish pilot who said he found a bomb intended to blow up the plane of Poland's wartime leader admitted to lying but the episode was hushed up by Britain's government, secret files released on Monday showed.

The apparent plot to assassinate General Wladyslaw Sikorski, who led the Polish government in exile until his death in 1943, sparked a big inquiry with suspicions it was a German or Russian conspiracy but it turned out the pilot took the bomb aboard.

Prime Minister Winston Churchill was dragged into the investigation as security chiefs scrambled to uncover the truth about what happened on the plane over the Atlantic, a year before Sikorski's death in a mysterious plane crash.

The pilot said he found a smouldering bomb on board the plane taking Sikorski from Scotland to Canada on March 21, 1942.

Polish Wing Commander Bohdan Kleczynski said he found the device burning under his mattress as he rested on the B-24 Liberator plane. He said the device broke into two pieces as he rushed to the back of the plane to throw it down the toilet.

"The detached part was so hot I threw it straight into the lavatory pan," Kleczynski told investigators, according to documents made public at Britain's National Archives.

Despite his seniority and reputation as one of Poland's finest fighter pilots, investigators quickly doubted his story.

"THE STORY IS FISHY"

Intelligence agent Lord Rothschild, who led the inquiry, said: "The story is fishy ... I am somewhat doubtful if this is a real attempt to liquidate the general."

Investigators questioned everyone on the plane and examined the small incendiary device. They found no evidence the bomb had partially exploded.

Other passengers said they too had smelt burning, but this had been traced to a minor electrical fault on the plane.

With the evidence stacking up against him, Kleczynski bowed to mounting pressure and finally admitted he had lied.

The bomb was his. The pilot always carried it with him in case he was shot down and needed to blow up his plane.

He had inadvertently taken the device onto the Polish leader's plane and panicked when he smelt burning during the flight, wrongly assuming the bomb was about to explode.

When told of the true nature of the "plot", Churchill wrote to Sikorski asking that the story be kept secret.

"He has been sufficiently punished by the mental anguish that he has passed through," Churchill wrote. "Having told one lie ... he was compelled to go on lying."

Sikorski died in a plane crash in Gibraltar a year later.

Debate still rages in Poland decades over what brought his plane down on July 4, 1943.

An inquiry failed to establish the cause of the accident, but ruled out sabotage, but a second British investigation in 1969 said there might have been foul play.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: assassinationplot; greatbritain; poland; sikorski; sikoski; uk; wladyslawsikorski; ww2

1 posted on 09/04/2006 10:38:14 AM PDT by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lizol
So what?

There's only one reason for this article; and that's to push the idea that all white Christian males are the scum of the earth.

2 posted on 09/04/2006 10:43:37 AM PDT by rvoitier (Democrat Party, not Democratic Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve54; nopardons; Mike Fieschko; Angelas; saltshaker; Jedi Master Pikachu; lost-and-found; ...
Eastern European ping list


FRmail me to be added or removed from this Eastern European ping list

3 posted on 09/04/2006 10:47:24 AM PDT by lizol (Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

This kind of thing should be covered up during the time of war. Abu Grabe should've been covered up and all the accusations against our soldiers should've also been even if it meant providing no comment. It is not appropriate during the time of war to allow what could be or most probably is enemy propaganda to grow legs and hurt the effort on the ground which accomplishes nothing but gets more of our soldiers killed and makes our job harder. War is hell and pretending it is always going to be executed with upmost care is a silly belief promoted in our me-first wussie society which can't deal with nonsense words like "Maccaca" let alone the perspective of a war zone.


4 posted on 09/04/2006 10:49:19 AM PDT by Maelstorm (I vote Republican because the alternative is voting for the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Odd how the Polish government in "exile" in England had its "views and interested" discarded by Churchill in favor of Stalin's Polish "puppets" and FDR's encouragement at Yalta.
5 posted on 09/04/2006 11:06:10 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
This kind of thing should be covered up during the time of war. Abu Grabe should've been covered up and all the accusations against our soldiers should've also been even if it meant providing no comment.

I agree with you.

Unfortunately modern technology makes it virtually impossible to do as a practicle mater.

Abu Gabe happened because of cheap digital photography permitted the guards to cheaply copy and share the photographs and movies they made of their tormenting their prisoners.

With the ability of photos and homemade movies to be emailed across the world instantaneously keeping something like Abu Grabe a secret is next to impossible unless you are fortunately able to catch it immediately.

The only reason Abu Grabe came to light was that the guards were sharing their photos for fun.

6 posted on 09/04/2006 11:07:38 AM PDT by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Say what?


7 posted on 09/04/2006 11:09:24 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Unless the Brits were pandering to Stalin (and there hadn't even been a Yalta Conference as of 1943), I still don't see what Churchill's motivation would be to kill Sikorski, although I know that this is widely believed in Poland. Of course, the British Government and secret intelligence services were chock full of commies who might have attempted a hit.


8 posted on 09/04/2006 11:11:12 AM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie
My guess is, that it was NKVD, not the Brits, that set up that plane crash in 1943, killing PM Sikorski.

But if I'm right - it's really difficult to get the reason, why the today's British government still keeps those files top classified, after 63 years.

As far as I've heard - recently they prolonged the clause for another 10 years or so.
9 posted on 09/04/2006 11:24:53 AM PDT by lizol (Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie

Churchill backed Stalin's version of Katyn, even though he knew it was a lie, and began backing away from the Polish government in exile when they continued to make noise about it.


10 posted on 09/04/2006 11:45:41 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lizol

British killed him or they let someone else do that.


11 posted on 09/04/2006 12:03:17 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
The bomb was his. The pilot always carried it with him in case he was shot down and needed to blow up his plane.

Interesting fact. Makes the headline a bit strange though.

12 posted on 09/04/2006 12:24:57 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

What on earth are you talking about?


13 posted on 09/04/2006 2:29:42 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Fine thanks for those Polish RAF pilots who saved Britain's bacon during the Battle of Britain.


14 posted on 09/04/2006 3:12:15 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Was it common for WW II pilots to carry bombs with them in order to blow up their own aircraft? I had not heard that before.


15 posted on 09/04/2006 3:56:50 PM PDT by Bernard ("America is not what's wrong with the world": Donald Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard

Me neither


16 posted on 09/04/2006 4:00:14 PM PDT by lizol (Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Congratulations! You found the elusive jet turbo switch that goes along with your hypersensitive button.


17 posted on 09/05/2006 4:31:42 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson