Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats on a roll in battle for U.S. Congress
Reuters ^ | Sept. 3, 2006 | John Whitesides

Posted on 09/03/2006 8:27:24 AM PDT by FairOpinion

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats enter the fall campaign with a clear edge in the high-stakes fight for control of the U.S. Congress, riding a wave of momentum that has them positioned to retake the U.S. House of Representatives and make significant gains in the Senate.

President George W. Bush's low approval ratings and public dissatisfaction with the Iraq war, gas prices and the country's direction threaten Republican leadership in Congress and put Democrats within reach of victory on November 7, analysts said.

"I don't think the question any longer is can Democrats win control of Congress, it's can Republicans do anything to stop it?" said Amy Walter, House analyst for the nonpartisan Cook Political Report newsletter. "All the factors and issues are pushing so strongly against Republicans."

All 435 House seats, 34 of 100 Senate seats and 36 governorships are at stake in November's election, with Democrats needing to pick up 15 House seats and six Senate seats to reclaim majorities.

Strategists in both parties say the glum public mood has created a strong desire for change and given Democrats a big advantage at the traditional opening of the campaign season on Monday's Labor Day holiday.

"It's too late to fix the national mood -- it's not going to be fixed," said Republican pollster Frank Luntz. "The major issues are not playing well for Republicans this year, and Republicans are not playing well with America this year."

History is also with Democrats -- the party holding the White House traditionally loses seats in a president's sixth year. The modern exception was 1998, when public unhappiness over the Republican-led impeachment of President Bill Clinton helped Democrats gain five House seats.

"This looks like a classic sixth-year election," said University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato, who called the president's low approval ratings, hovering at about 40 percent, "the single best indicator for any mid-term election."

A Democratic majority in even one chamber of Congress would slam the brakes on what is left of Bush's second-term legislative agenda and hasten his descent into lame-duck status in the final two years of his presidency.

It also would give Democrats an opportunity to hold hearings and investigate many of the administration's more controversial foreign, military and energy policy decisions.

Candidates around the country will spend Monday's Labor Day holiday marching in parades, shaking hands at fairs and laying the groundwork for the final two-month push to the November 7 election.

KEY BATTLEGROUNDS

About 40 House districts and a dozen Senate seats will be the key battlegrounds, and they will be flooded in the next two months with campaign cash and appearances by party big shots.

Democrats are in the strongest position in the House, analysts said, where nearly every endangered incumbent is Republican. Independent analyst Stuart Rothenberg projects a Democratic gain of 15-20 seats, while the Cook Report lists 17 House seats as toss-ups -- all Republican.

But Republican House campaign spokesman Carl Forti shrugged off predictions of a takeover.

"We're nowhere near as bad off as the experts would have you believe," he said, adding Bush's low ratings and public dissatisfaction with the Republican-led Congress would not determine House races.

In the Senate, Democrats are expected to pick up seats. But to win control they will need to bump off at least five Republican incumbents -- difficult but not impossible even under favorable conditions.

In recent polls, Democratic challengers led Republican incumbents Rick Santorum in Pennsylvania, Conrad Burns in Montana and Mike DeWine in Ohio. Jim Talent in Missouri, Lincoln Chafee in Rhode Island and George Allen in Virginia also face re-election struggles.

The open Tennessee seat of retiring Republican Senate Leader Bill Frist is also on the endangered list for Republicans.

Democratic incumbents Maria Cantwell in Washington, Debbie Stabenow in Michigan and Bob Menendez in New Jersey face potentially tough races, and Democrats must defend open seats in Minnesota and Maryland.

Many voters do not start paying attention until late in the campaign and many candidates only start spending heavily in September, giving the races plenty of chances to shift before the election.

Unexpected events, like the capture of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden or a major terrorist strike, could quickly shift the political landscape.

"I'm a political realist. Can we win? Yes, but this is 10 weeks out and a lot can happen in 10 weeks," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; alreuters; congress; congresselections; democrats; election2006; elections; midterms; ohplease; reuterslies; wishfulthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last
To: goldfinch
The thing is...the 2004 election should not even been close. Kerry was an awful candidate, arrogant and aloof, and yet, he came within 20,000 votes of winning. Do not underestimate the power of the MSM.

20,000? It was more like 150,000 in Ohio.

And also Evan Thomas from Newsweek( and his grandfather was a big socialist in the 30's) stated that the liberal MSM gives any democrat candidate a 10 to 15% lead with their journalistic bias.

101 posted on 09/03/2006 1:15:31 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Article is nothing more than a wish list.

IF NOMINEES PRESS HARD ON THE GAY MARRIAGE AMMENDMENTS, WE WILL TAKE '06. THERE ARE MANY SEATS UP FOR GRABS IN STATES THAT WILL DECIDE ON THIS ISSUE IN NOVEMBER

102 posted on 09/03/2006 1:38:38 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hnj_00

Gald to hear ait! Bob Jt. is not the man his father was. He will gave in to the pro aborts.


103 posted on 09/03/2006 1:44:33 PM PDT by Dodgers fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All; Treize

Also read this relevant, excellent article:

Is Suicide the Conservative Alternative?(Interesting Read)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1694947/posts

"Most of the pessimists — and that includes just about every political guru around — insist that Republicans will sit it out, thus handing control of the House at the very least, and maybe even the Senate, to the Democrats. I'll accept that view only if Republican voters prove to be either politically suicidal of just plain stupid.

The concept that it's a good idea to wreak vengeance on the Republican Party by standing aside and allowing Democrats, who will proceed to wreak havoc on the nation, to take over Capitol Hill, is nothing less than a death wish that borders on insanity."


104 posted on 09/03/2006 1:51:42 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Isn't this the same Reuters that doctored photos from Lebanon? Do they still have any credibility?


105 posted on 09/03/2006 1:51:52 PM PDT by Dodgers fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Welike ike
Gold, the reason it was close was the Debates, not the Media.bush was tired and off in the 3 debates.

I don't think the debates hurt Bush much. People did not expect him to win the debates. I don't remember any big drop in the polls after any of them. What hurts is unrelenting negativism of the MSM. It is death by a thousand cuts. You don't have to like the MSM or respect it...but do not underestimate its power. It is worth at least 5 percentage points on election day.
106 posted on 09/03/2006 2:36:16 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tet68

The most ridiculous statement is that the dems have MOMENTUM. No, the republicans may suck, but people definitely are NOT flocking to the dems.


107 posted on 09/03/2006 3:05:37 PM PDT by boop (Now Greg, you know I don't like that WORD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Explain, please.

Are you aware this is a conservative political board?
108 posted on 09/03/2006 3:32:47 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
How about Bush's tax cuts, which turned the economy around? We have a good economy, the MSM just doesn't want to tell people.

They don't elect you based on what you did for them two years or four years back. Doesn't happen.

It's always about this year. It's what you are offering them that they want and how scary your opponent is.

Also, Bush tried to get a social security reform enacted, but the Dems obstructed it.

No one in either party ever gets any votes at the polls based on what they didn't accomplish due to obstructionism from their own or the other party. Doesn't happen.

If we have nuclear plants, and drilled in ANWR and off shore, gas would be cheaper because we wouldn't have to depend on foreign oil -- all these have been and continue to be obstructed by the Dems.

More things that Republicans didn't do for the voters. See above. These energy issues should have been kept entirely off the legislative agenda or they should have been enacted, politically speaking.

And as for terrorism -- that is still the top issue, or should be -- if we get nuked, none of the other things will matter.

The average obese ignorant American is sitting on their couch, stuffing their faces with Chitos and Budweiser. They're not panicked that Osama is going to nuke them. And the Bush administration's failure to apprehend Osama would work against GOP candidates if a nuclear incident occurred during the runup to Novemember's elections.

I suppose the fact that I don't lay awake worrying over Osama nuking me makes me some kind of liberal. But I'm not worried. And I wouldn't be worried if I lived in a big city either.
109 posted on 09/03/2006 3:40:04 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

That would make an excellent campaign slogan.


110 posted on 09/03/2006 5:32:20 PM PDT by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Unicorn

This is an old political trick used by the Dems since FDR. Use a sympathic media to create a self-fulfilling prophesy. I worked well for them when libs dominated the media, their monopoly on the flow of information has been broken , so we don't have to buy into their bs.


111 posted on 09/03/2006 5:36:31 PM PDT by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RodgerD
.Ronald Reagan... Nice misdirection try. Try defending Bush's amnesty and third-world migration schemes on their own merits. and sorry if I don't believe, as you appear to, that merging our homeland with Mexico and then tripling third-world migration, including mulsim immigration, is a great idea.

Nice avoidance of the hard fact YOU brought up by accusing ME of misdirection.

You said it was treasonous to make an amnesty law. Reagan signed an amnesty bill into law. Thus, Reagan is treasonous in your view.

You hung yoursefl, Rog, and no amount of spin will change that. Deal with it.

112 posted on 09/03/2006 5:46:40 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Coop
What do you expect the final net change to be, house and senate?
113 posted on 09/03/2006 7:14:39 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Heck, this far out? Whatever WAG I throw out there is pretty irrelevant. :-) The GOP is doing well in fundraising, although the Dems are doing very well in fundraising with regards to the Senate. The environment has improved for the GOP over the past two months, and Dubya hasn't really even started rolling on his fundraising yet. And gas prices have eased and will hopefully continue to do so.

It's kind of a cop out, but I don't anticipate a major change in either branch, for either party. But it's close enough that one or two key events could decide a lot of elections.

How's that for a non-answer? I should run for office!

114 posted on 09/03/2006 7:22:46 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Okay then how about this: Who do you think has the more effective GOTV effort this time around? I remember that was supposed to be Kilgore's magic bullet against Kaine in the VA Gov race. Didn't exactly turn out that way.


115 posted on 09/03/2006 7:38:03 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

Who knows?


116 posted on 09/03/2006 8:03:48 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Because unlike Freepers and other interested ConservPubs, the majority of voters still gets its bias from the MSM and is easily brainwashed by a wave of anti-Pub, anti-war storms that continually lie, and say the GOP is out of touch blah, blah. They use the Goebbels bit and by heavens with many elections it works. We shall have to see if the GOP side will come out strong in many targeted races and if the money is so targeted that the truth is told about handing over the reigns of national security to a do nothing Dem vision, and a socialist pacifist leftist agenda which seems more like revenge than it does policy. I would not put it past the voters to punish the GOP by thinking the Dems are actually patrios with another vision. They could not be more wrong but that is what free will does at election time!!!!!


117 posted on 09/03/2006 8:30:03 PM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
Cantwell: defeated by about 2 points due to third-party split

Only if someone puts a lid on the huge voter fraud there.

118 posted on 09/03/2006 9:47:56 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
So the merits of merging our homeland with Mexico and tripling third-world migration, including mulsim immigration are.....?

...crickets...

119 posted on 09/03/2006 9:53:34 PM PDT by RodgerD (Reject the Democrat's Migration Explosion Act of 2006. No to 70 million new third-world aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The concept that it's a good idea to wreak vengeance on the Republican Party by standing aside and allowing Democrats, who will proceed to wreak havoc on the nation, to take over Capitol Hill, is nothing less than a death wish that borders on insanity."

In total agreement with you.

I would never consider voting for a Dim in this election. Not even if he/she were related to me.

I promise you this. I will vote Republican and will personally deliver to the polls at least a couple hundred Republican votes in my district.

120 posted on 09/03/2006 10:22:06 PM PDT by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson