No, his lying cost him his reputation. Libby only one indicted, because he lied.
Or, libby could have just been confused like he said he was!!!!
Hold onto that. It's a good look for you.
Soooo, he is guilty until proven INNOCENT????
I don't think sd!
Libby lied? To whom? About what?
IMHO he lied because of his loyalty
Perhaps not. Watching the Prosecutoral misconduct in the Rush Drug case and the Duke Rape case I think people should be really careful about assuming guilt because someone is indicted. I suspect Libby said a couple of things and then later said something that seemed to contradict it, or that was contradicted by later records and Fritz just choose to make his the sacrificial goat to appease the Junk Media wolf pack.
It is entirely probable that Libby is being prosecuted for making a simple mistake in his testimony. Since the Libby prosecution is in no way relevant to the supposed crime under investigation, a serious prosecutor would of dismissed the case. Especially since the supposed crime turned out to be not a crime at all.
From start to finish this is a manufactured political persecution. Plame was not covert, no one "leaked" her NOT secret identify. Thus no crime. There should of been no prosecution.