Dude. Article. Read. Sorry, but FR wouldn't let me post more than the first chunk of it due to word-limit. Here's the judge quote:
"Giuliani would appoint strict constructionists to the judiciary
Social conservatives who want to see Roe v. Wade overturned and who fear the imposition of same-sex marriage on unwilling populations by judicial fiat have a friend in Giuliani. Rudy has now explicitly voiced support for the appointment of strict constructionists to the federal bench. His recent trip to Minnesota included an admission that he would appoint judges like Roberts and Alito. During this same trip, Rudy also confirmed that he believes legislatures, and not judges, should set policy. A Giuliani presidency would now almost certainly fail to yield judicial rulings from the federal bench in favor of gay marriage, and would be at least as likely as any other Republican presidency to see abortion returned to the political process, where it belongs."
COLMES: Now, Roe vs. Wade -- You are pro-choice. How important is it to you as a pro-choice Republican to have a pro-choice on the court as someone...
GIULIANI: That is not the critical factor. And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And he fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category.
---July 21st, 2005.
In 1999, Giuliani was asked his views on abortion. He said, "I'm pro-choice. I'm pro-gay rights." When asked about banning Partial Birth Abortion, the then-Senate candidate replied, "No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing."
----November 16th, 2004
Dude, camel's nose and the best way to keep it out of the tent.
I still remember Rudy moving in with a homosexual couple after his split with his wife while she went to appear in the "vagina monologues"
No thanks
(BTW anyone who would care to look into the subject might want to check out Regan's "Kitchen Cabinet")
Uh-huh.
Welcome to FR, liberal.