Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Washington scandal that wasn't
National Post ^ | 2006-09-02 | David Frum

Posted on 09/02/2006 5:19:23 AM PDT by Clive

Has a Washington scandal ever ended with a more anti-climactic splat than the Valerie Plame/Joe Wilson affair?

This week it was at last fully and finally confirmed that it was former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage who had leaked the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

Put like that, the story sounds pretty bare. So let me put it another way. Imagine that Ken Starr's investigation had concluded that Monica Lewinsky had made the whole thing up -- and that it was established beyond all possible doubt that at the very moment Monica claimed she was experiencing ecstasy in the Oval Office with Bill Clinton, Clinton was in fact up in the White House family quarters helping Hillary sort old wedding photographs.

Imagine all that, and you only begin to imagine how utterly the biggest scandal of the Bush years has fizzled into nothing.

The scandal originated in George Bush's Jan. 28, 2003, State of the Union address:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Six months later, on July 6, 2003, The New York Times published an op-ed by one Joseph Wilson that accused the president of twisting intelligence. Wilson explained that the CIA had sent him to Niger in 2002 to investigate Iraqi uranium buying -- and that he had reported back that it was all bunk. Suddenly all Washington was asking the same question: Who the hell was Joe Wilson?

Wilson, a former ambassador to Gabon now struggling to earn a living as an international business consultant, seemed a very unlikely person to investigate a secret nuclear transaction. The next week, syndicated columnist Robert Novak provided the answer: Wilson had been proposed for the assignment by his wife, Valerie Plame, "an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction."

The administration's critics immediately erupted in outrage. "Did senior Bush officials blow the cover of a U.S. intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security -- and break the law -- in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?" So demanded David Corn of The Nation magazine.

For his part, Ambassador Wilson vehemently denied that his wife had anything to do with his assignment.

The administration succumbed to media pressure and appointed a special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, to investigate the case. Critics gleefully settled in to wait for "Fitzmas" -- the happy day when the prosecutor would indict the so-called neocon cabal. Many speculated that the scandal must touch the Vice President, even the President. Wilson himself said he was looking forward to seeing Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs.

Over time, it became clear that almost every detail of Joe Wilson's original story was false. Wilson's appointment was engineered by his wife. The report he filed did not acquit the Iraqis. Wilson had not detected forged documents. Above all: An Iraqi trade mission had in fact sought uranium in Niger in 1998 -- the President had spoken accurately.

Nonetheless, the Plame scandal ricocheted throughout the government. The Bush administration's pro-democracy, pro-Israel foreign policies were ferociously opposed by most of the U.S. national-security bureaucracy, and especially the CIA. Inflamed by the Plame allegations, CIA officials acted almost as part of the Kerry campaign organization through campaign 2004. Since Kerry's defeat, CIA betrayals of administration secrets have helped clinch one Pulitzer Prize for The New York Times and another for the Washington Post.

Yet somehow Fitzmas never came.

And then last week, Newsweek excerpted a new book co-authored by the magazine's Michael Isikoff and arch-conspiracy theorist David Corn that reveals that the Plame leak sprang not from Rove or Cheney, but from Armitage -- and that Patrick Fitzgerald has known this truth for close to three years.

Armitage was never an administration hawk. Indeed, he and his close friend Colin Powell loathed the so-called neocon cabal as fervently as David Corn himself. Armitage identified Plame to Novak not to settle scores, but out of a weak-minded delight in gossip.

Armitage, a former Marine, often questioned the physical courage of civilians who disagreed with him. But after the scandal exploded, and even as his administration colleagues and the President to whom he owed loyalty were exposed to enormous legal jeopardy by his actions, he kept silent to protect himself.

It's a shameful story. But the shame does not fall quite where the media promoters of the story hoped it would. Which may explain why newspapers such as The New York Times and left-wing blogs which once relished every last twist and turn of the saga have suddenly gone as silent about it as Armitage himself.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; davidfrum; plamebroiled; plamegate; plameout; wilaonsonw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: mware
Seems they waited over an hour before telling them. There goes all those conspiracies about the military letting the planes hit without going after them.

Bush/Rove machine got to them.

41 posted on 09/02/2006 6:01:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Frum falls short of calling it for what it really was... another DNC/MSM concocted SCAM.

What you have right here boys & girls is RATher/Mapes/Burkett/Lockhart 1.0... with an upgrade. This time, the DNC had loyal operatives(Clinton stooges) in critical positions willing to whore for them... instead of some old, half-nuts DNC activist in TX.

No crude forgeries were needed on this one... it was all word of mouth... he-said... she-said.

42 posted on 09/02/2006 6:02:52 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asp1

I wondered about a class action suit against the publisher for publishing "fiction" as non-fiction". Some people may want their money back....


43 posted on 09/02/2006 6:07:03 AM PDT by KeepUSfree (WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anselma
I know how you feel, but I have learned not to get worked up because no one on our side ever fights back. Our politicos still bow and scrape to dems. I'm sick of us smiling while dems are stabbing us in the back. Maybe you are right. Maybe we in the new media have to scream this loud and clear although I don't think it will do any good unless it comes from the bully pulpit.

Off topic: Apology accepted. I probably over reacted. We're good. :O)
44 posted on 09/02/2006 6:08:35 AM PDT by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: Zuben Elgenubi

Good for Mark he gets right to the heart of the matter. Who's listeneing?


46 posted on 09/02/2006 6:10:24 AM PDT by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Yeah. The MSM is not gonna cover this to any large degree. This story is gonna go down the Orwellian memory hole.


47 posted on 09/02/2006 6:12:36 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: Captain Ray
There was nothing to this whole story, the MSM new it the whole time, and the President did not lie.

You summed it up quite nicely.

49 posted on 09/02/2006 6:14:55 AM PDT by Bahbah (Goldwasser, Regev and Shalit, we are praying for you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KeepUSfree
There you go...Oprah had an author who "expanded the truth" in his book and the publisher had to return some money. (I think I have that story straight or at least close.) Has Plame's book come out yet?
50 posted on 09/02/2006 6:15:47 AM PDT by asp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"Yep ole honest straight-shooter Fritz knew a long time ago the leak was a non-issue, but he continued down the path very carefully wording stuff so he could continue his non-investigation hoping something else may turn up all while collecting big fat government checks."

Fitz was shooting for Attorney General Fitz in 2008 as thanks from the DNC. Sorry Fitz, you will have to chase ambulances come 2008.



51 posted on 09/02/2006 6:16:27 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exit82
"Libby needs to have all charges dropped."

My questions are 1) will they reimburse Scooter Libby for the cost of the legal expenses he incurred because of this; 2) will he get his job back at the White House? There used to be a policy (law?) that the looser in a court case had to pay all court expenses. Will Chucky repay the U.S. Treasury/American taxpayer for what it cost to put on this sham? The number of days of work Karl Rove alone missed should put a dent into Chucky's bank account.
52 posted on 09/02/2006 6:19:44 AM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Humal

Britain has a law that the loser pays costs, but not here. Libby will have to seek satisfaction through lawsuits of his own. I wish we could charge Howard Dean's, Harry Reid's, Nancy Pelosi's,Barb Boxer's, Diane Feinstein's, the NYTimes' and the WashPost's bank accounts to make Libby whole.

The Republicans should have fund raising dinners to help Libby.


53 posted on 09/02/2006 6:23:16 AM PDT by exit82 (Sorry. You, along with Pluto, have just been voted out of the solar system(from FreeperLasVegasMac).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"...ole honest straight-shooter Fritz ..."

How many times have we heard ALL of the media, not just "MSM" use that term? Ad nauseum--literally. Now that the truth's out, is anyone besides WaPo and Fox covering this? Shouldn't there be some apologies from the media to Scooter Libby for publicly defaming him? As for Fitz, seems there should at the very least be a prosecutorial misconduct charge.

54 posted on 09/02/2006 6:23:29 AM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
The MSM is painting him as some sort of buffoonish, DC gossiper... Colin McPowell's right-hand man at the State Department!
55 posted on 09/02/2006 6:26:49 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exit82

"Libby will have to seek satisfaction through lawsuits of his own."

If this is his only recourse, I sincerely hope he does.


56 posted on 09/02/2006 6:27:06 AM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Clive

If you or I misappropriately funds the the extent Fitzpatrick has, we would be prosecuted.

Has anyone information re. prosecutorial misconduct by the Fitzpatrick?


57 posted on 09/02/2006 6:28:16 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Now, the MSM just wants this to go away.
I think we are in the age where more people are using the Internet for in depth news.
The MSM is in a decline for news events, this is quite evident in lay offs for those working in the publishing business.
Forums such as we have here at FR are the news for the future and, growing more every month.
It's so refreshing to read the truth from people we have come to know as , "truth searcher's" and take the time to write their discoveries for the American people.
I use to be a MSM news freak until a Dr., M.D. introduced me to the Internet and, gave me a P/c. That was seven yrs. ago and, today the only TV news I care about and, watch is evening news on Fox.


58 posted on 09/02/2006 6:31:06 AM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clive
and that Patrick Fitzgerald has known this truth for close to three years.

If this is true, didn't Fitsgerald himself break the law?

59 posted on 09/02/2006 6:34:00 AM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buck61

Agreed. Same here re: Fox News. Anything else I find unwatchable, or part of an alternate universe.


60 posted on 09/02/2006 6:34:49 AM PDT by exit82 (Sorry. You, along with Pluto, have just been voted out of the solar system(from FreeperLasVegasMac).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson