Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iranian paradox: to gain victory the West must first concede defeat
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1061-2326132,00.html ^ | August 24, 2006 | Anatole Kaletsky

Posted on 09/01/2006 12:30:30 AM PDT by RusIvan

DEFEAT IS NEVER pleasant, but often it is better to lose than to win. Defeat in the Second World War was the best thing that ever happened to Germany and Japan in their thousand years of recorded history. For America, losing in Vietnam was also a blessing in disguise. While defeat seemed to shatter the illusion of an “American century” of global dominance, it was followed by 30 years of almost uninterrupted prosperity, a political renaissance for conservative values and America’s total victory over communism in the Cold War. Such thoughts may not offer much consolation to George Bush, Tony Blair and Ehud Olmert as they contemplate their defeat at the hands of Iran and its Hezbollah allies. But the ordinary citizens of America, Britain and Israel should try to draw some constructive lessons from history, even while their leaders make ever greater fools of themselves with their idle threats against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; nukes; prolifiration

1 posted on 09/01/2006 12:30:31 AM PDT by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

The Times Paradox: to gain sanity, Anatole Kaletsky must first concede insanity.


2 posted on 09/01/2006 12:32:45 AM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
while their leaders make ever greater fools of themselves with their idle threats against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
The only reason they're making fools of themselves is because the lack the cojones to carry out on the threats. Does anyone doubt that we could elminate the Iranian government in 30 days or less with non-nuclear force?

 

3 posted on 09/01/2006 12:38:29 AM PDT by peyton randolph (No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

So, let me see if I understand this right - It was great for America to defeat Germany and Japan, but it just wouldn't be right for them to defeat Iran, because it offends them because they can't get off their lazy rumps and do the work that has to be done?

Have I got that right?

Or are we supposed to put our heads between our knees and defy anatomy by putting our heads up our rumps like most of Europe has done, while at the same time suffering whole regions being taken over by 'immigrants' who, like our Mexicans, treat it not as immigration but as a new place to start up their culture?

These Europeans. Every time I turn around, they make me ask questions.


4 posted on 09/01/2006 12:39:39 AM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

Just lay down and die... Thank you for this valuable advice, Mr. Kaletsky! Here is hoping you can use it one day too.


5 posted on 09/01/2006 12:43:29 AM PDT by eclectic (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
For America, losing in Vietnam was also a blessing in disguise.

And a death sentence for millions of people living under communist rule in Cambodia and Vietnam. A fact most liberals seem to forget.
6 posted on 09/01/2006 12:47:35 AM PDT by Ticonderoga34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
"While defeat seemed to shatter the illusion of an “American century” of global dominance,..."

Will western Europe ever concede that we Americans don't agree with them on their lust for "empire?"
7 posted on 09/01/2006 1:10:02 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: RusIvan

Who is this moron Kaletsky? He has absolutely no idea what he's talking about. Iran is not going to build nuclear weapons under any circumstances. The entire world is opposed to that idea even if some countries appear to be neutral about this issue. If necessary, there will be a regime change in Iran caused by a number of interested nations, before Iran ever acquires nuclear weapons.


9 posted on 09/01/2006 1:35:48 AM PDT by defenderSD (Blogging from a secure undisclosed location in the southwestern United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
The defeat the left now advocates for America will be far more painful than VietNam. After that defeat there was a bloodbath in South East Asia and people loyal to the concept of freedom fled on small boats.

This time you will face a delusional Islamo-fascist with nukes and rockets to carry such weapons.

Please tell me what you expect to happen if we pull out of the young democracy, Iraq which is next-door to terroristic Iran.

10 posted on 09/01/2006 2:49:09 AM PDT by Rapscallion (What America now faces is far worse than the lowest point in the Cold War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Iran is not going to build nuclear weapons under any circumstances.

Do not bet big money on that. Iran's nuclear development program is already underway with technical assistance from North Korea.

11 posted on 09/01/2006 2:53:00 AM PDT by Rapscallion (What America now faces is far worse than the lowest point in the Cold War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Like many people, I think you're underestimating the power of all the nations that are opposed to a nuclear-armed Iran, and that is because so far these nations have only used a very small fraction of that power. But they will use whatever power they have to use to stop the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Nobody wants Iran to build nukes except Iran and a few little two-bit dictatorships in the UN.


12 posted on 09/01/2006 3:03:16 AM PDT by defenderSD (Blogging from a secure undisclosed location in the southwestern United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan

Ah, the European solution.

Nuts.


13 posted on 09/01/2006 3:40:57 AM PDT by Roy Tucker ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"--Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zert_28
And a death sentence for millions of people living under communist rule in Cambodia and Vietnam

Ah yes, the compassion of the left.

The left fakes horror at our servicemen's deaths and ignores their bloody hands.

14 posted on 09/01/2006 4:09:02 AM PDT by Jacquerie (All Muslims are suspect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eclectic

"The Iranian paradox: to gain victory the West must first concede defeat.

Well, with France and Americans Democrats they are already off to a good start.


15 posted on 09/01/2006 4:59:11 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Mediacrat - A leftwing editorialist who pretends to be an objective journalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson