Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It is now well-known that the GOP has a HUGE fundraising advantage leading into the '06 elections. It is also commonly believed that the GOP base's energy level is down quite a bit. After all, there are some people on this site who are so down out immigration and spending they simply want to sit these elections out. The truth is, as it turns out, that Republicans truly grasp the stakes of a Pelosi/Reed congress and are spending and working to fight against it. The press has thus far woefully underestimated the energy of GOP activists, fundraisers, and especially social conservatives seeing a huge opportunity to embrace the Bush "compassionate conservative" ideal. When Nov. 7 ends, the GOP will win and the money advantage is just one reason.
1 posted on 08/31/2006 5:09:04 AM PDT by Rawlings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Rawlings

What, George Soros hasn't given them his PIN number ?


2 posted on 08/31/2006 5:11:38 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings
"Eighty percent of our message is negative," one party strategist said.

Bush's fault.

Actually, if you contributed a check for ten cents to the DNC, they will spend postage money hounding you for more. If you can stand the spam, you can deplete their coffers.

4 posted on 08/31/2006 5:13:25 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1691922/posts


5 posted on 08/31/2006 5:15:50 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

With campaign finance laws being what they are, what can the GOP spend this money on? Or are we going to see 527s again? I hope the GOP does better in this arena than they did in 2004. It seemed like all the 527s were Democrat.


7 posted on 08/31/2006 5:17:45 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

8 posted on 08/31/2006 5:17:54 AM PDT by The G Man (The NY Times did "great harm to the United States" - President George W. Bush 6/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

"...social conservatives seeing a huge opportunity to embrace the Bush "compassionate conservative" ideal."


IF Conservatives (big C, no other qualifiers needed) do turn out strongly to vote GOP, they will do so holding their noses (AGAIN) and not because they endorse something as nebulous (and triangulated) as "compassionate conservatism".


9 posted on 08/31/2006 5:18:31 AM PDT by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

He called for a much bolder agenda from the party, including a universal health care plan, full withdrawal of troops from Iraq this year and a commitment to stop any attempt to ban gay marriage.


I'm with Feingold. That should be the Democratic party's agenda. That would assure the most overwhelming defeat in his party's history. Go for it Russ!


10 posted on 08/31/2006 5:19:42 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

Still doesn't take into account the hundreds of millions of dollars in free advertising that passes as MSM news...or the value of the free labor the unions (including the NEA) puts out on the streets. Dems can moan and groan but they've still got advantages due to media bias and union perqs.


11 posted on 08/31/2006 5:21:27 AM PDT by peyton randolph (No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

So, this is the Democratic party and it's far left nuts bin that are going to run the country should they take the congress in the fall? They've spent years doing nothing productive for the country...only whining/ascerbic politics and they STILL can't get their act together as a group on their current single cause.
This, folks, is not leadership.


12 posted on 08/31/2006 5:22:27 AM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

Today's Democrats are totally bankrupt of any ideas or ideals. Their only goal is to win, any way they can. They sound as though they're grasping for straws. Couldn't happen to a better bunch.


15 posted on 08/31/2006 5:25:37 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings
Rawlings?

Is that you, Matt?

17 posted on 08/31/2006 5:28:05 AM PDT by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

--they're gonna get $40 million in union dues from the AFL-CIO--


18 posted on 08/31/2006 5:28:13 AM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

But I thought getting the money out of politics was good. Did they change their minds now?


19 posted on 08/31/2006 5:29:58 AM PDT by Larry Lucido ("There's no problem so big that government intervention can't make it worse.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings
MoveOn says it stopped running ads in the earlier districts because Emanuel's Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is now involved in those races so they've focused their efforts on other places where ads by Democratic groups aren't running.)

Isn't this a detailed confeesion to criminal behavior, as outside groups are not allowed to coordinate with the parties.

22 posted on 08/31/2006 5:34:19 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

Sorry Dems - but you have been making such a big deal out of the Hurrican Katrina (one year later) that I feel so bad and so guilty that I haven't done enough so that from now on all of my extra money if I have any must go to the Katrina victims and the rebuilding of New Orleans.


24 posted on 08/31/2006 5:36:59 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

25 posted on 08/31/2006 5:38:37 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup ("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings
I am one of the "down and depressed" Republicans this year based on what a united House, Senate and President have been able to achieve with a majority but -

I will be at the Voting Both in November voting for Republicans at the State and National level.

Local? It will depend on the position and person.
27 posted on 08/31/2006 5:45:11 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

I read yesterday where the AFL/CIO is ready to spend $40 million on ads, so there goes the GOP's ad advantage.


28 posted on 08/31/2006 5:46:12 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings
the GOP has a HUGE fundraising advantage

I suspect the Demonicrats plan to counter this by doing some fundraising of their own - they'll just make some trips to Iran, China, Syria, North Korea and Venezuela

29 posted on 08/31/2006 5:46:51 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rawlings

Thanks for posting this. I've been saying the same thing for some time now. Not only is Dean screwing the party by misallocating funding, but the funding that is replacing it (Soros/MoveOn) isn't attuned to any traditional winning Dem message (Bush is evil vs. min wage/healthcare, for example).

Also, one story the media (surprise) has not spent much attention on is the split in unions and how some unions are not as well funded as usual. Unions will play less of a role in 2006.

I'm not trying to be pollyanish, but I think predictions of Dems taking the House are overblown.

I remember some months after the 1994 election the Wall St Journal published an op-ed with an analysis showing that it was not so much the Contract With America that helped the GOP win, but that GOP challengers were able to raise a significant amount of $$$ to overcome Dem incumbent advantages.

They could not outspend the Dems, but they were able to reach a threshold that allowed them to get their message out. That, combined with overwhelming rejection of Clinton agenda was responsible for GOP win.


30 posted on 08/31/2006 5:51:46 AM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson