Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Demo bills highlight contrasts. (California)
Marcury News ^ | Aug. 29, 2006 | Mike Zapler and Edwin Garcia

Posted on 08/30/2006 7:22:06 PM PDT by FairOpinion

The state Assembly on Monday passed a pair of sweeping social policy changes -- a universal health care bill and a proposal to allow undocumented immigrants to apply for driver's licenses -- that have virtually no chance of becoming law but could become fodder in the governor's race this fall.

The bills represent heartfelt Democratic causes and are certain to draw vetoes from Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, should they reach his desk. They also highlight important differences between Schwarzenegger and his opponent, Democratic Treasurer Phil Angelides.

The difference is sharpest on the driver's license bill: Schwarzenegger opposes it; Angelides said that as governor, he would sign it. The contrast could give Schwarzenegger a boost among conservatives, or Angelides an opportunity to rally Latino voters.

As for the health care bill, an Angelides campaign spokesman said he has not endorsed the measure approved Monday, Senate Bill 840. But the aide, Nick Papas, was still optimistic that the legislation could give the treasurer an opening to draw contrasts with Schwarzenegger on health care.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2006election; angelides; california; callegislation; cedillo; driverslicense; election2006; elections; kuehl; sb1162; sb840; schwarzenegger; universalhealthcare

1 posted on 08/30/2006 7:22:08 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"Some point out that Schwarzenegger's overall record on health care has largely been in opposition to expansion of coverage. The governor vetoed legislation last year that would have expanded coverage to all children in the state and campaigned in 2004 against a proposal that would have required businesses with 50 employees or more to provide health insurance.

Although a campaign aide said in June that Angelides supports the Kuehl bill, Crumley said the treasurer has been consistent in his support of only "working toward" universal coverage beginning with coverage for all children and moving to coverage for workers at large employers. "



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/08/30/BAGM7KRPTL1.DTL&type=politics


2 posted on 08/30/2006 7:24:31 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

So Arnold's envirowacko agreement with the Dims is contrast too?


3 posted on 08/30/2006 7:26:33 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This, or something similar to this was in the L.A. Times today. The Dems are passing a lot of stuff they think will get vetoed to make Arnold look bad.

Even though I think Arnold will veto this drive-by legislative attack, I will hold my breath until he does. All of this hits too close to home.

4 posted on 08/30/2006 7:30:15 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Teh global warmiong bill is stupid, Arnold tried to make it more business friendly by allowing trading of the emission credits, but it's still stupid.

The answer to that is NOT to help Angelides get elected instead of Arnold.

The answer is to work to get more Republicans elected, to stop the Dems from passing over a thousand bills a year, most of which are highly damaging to CA.

Arnold put those propositions on the ballot, which would have gone a long way towards that, by taking away the unions power and doing a redistricting. But where were the conservatives? They stayed home or even voted against those bills and now they are running around blaming Arnold.


5 posted on 08/30/2006 7:47:03 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Q: So Arnold's envirowacko agreement with the Dims is contrast too?

A: The global warming bill is stupid

Bet that one caught you off guard.

6 posted on 08/30/2006 8:11:53 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Til Arnold licensed the pagans to go after the Christians. I bet that caught Arnold's defenders off guard.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

7 posted on 08/30/2006 9:34:30 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The answer to that is NOT to help Angelides get elected instead of Arnold.

I don't know about you, but I'd rather die a quick, clean death than a slow agonizing one.

Arnold is setting up a Villaraigosa 2010 run and subsequent victory.

8 posted on 08/30/2006 9:55:23 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (404 Page Error Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

With such defeatist attitude why don't we just all jump into the ocean and drown ourselves. Pitiful!


9 posted on 08/30/2006 9:56:55 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Arnold tried to make it more business friendly by allowing trading of the emission credits

Business friendly? This cap and trade program is exacly NOT friendly! It's racketeering at its finest.

10 posted on 08/30/2006 10:55:40 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
If calcowgirl had a business and wanted to benefit from this "emissions credit" program, she'd have to do a lot of paperwork to qualify for the credits. And the worst aspect of this is the decision about that will be politically driven. Racketeering at its finest indeed.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

11 posted on 08/30/2006 11:02:48 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson