Posted on 08/30/2006 10:50:23 AM PDT by Laverne
Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie. She was NOT covert and hadn't been for at least 5 years when her name was used. No law was broken, no crime committed
(G-d, can't these people EVER get it right?)
The NYT is still going with the "covert" crap too.
Looks like little joe-joe wilson burns in hell again....thought he had Bush where he wanted him, he he he, nice try little joe-joe but you lost!
This is good. The WSJ op-ed piece was even better. But has anyone seen what the NYT has to say about all this?
What happens to her book deal now?
The mystery is solved. Who would buy her book?
And, who will they sue?
Where can they go now to get in the news and have the cameras clicking? Fame is coming to am end, they're looking like real losers now.
Vanity Fair may help them out.
The NYT is still saying she was covert, and again spinning it as though the disclosure was related to Wilson's op-ed on the war.
OOPS!!!
"obstructing justice."
How can you obstruct 'justice' when an 'injustice' wasn't committed in the first place?
Karl Rove, or "turd blossom"
???????????
I'm betting Plame-Wilson divorce within six months.
Let the the loony left think this. It really is a moot point now that it has been shown that it was one of their own that leaked her name.
What I am waiting for now is to see who on the left will have the guts, the maturity to admit they were wrong all along and apologize to the administration.
Will it be Joe Wilson? No way. He is an immature little bully who gets jobs only because of his wife's CIA position.
Will it be Nancy 'Botox' Pelosi? No way. She has never cared about the truth so why start now? And, she is not adult enough to apologize to anyone.
Will it be John S'Kerry?? Well, again we all know the answer to that one. He is just a typical lib: Truth? We don't care about no stinking truth! Apologize? For what??
Will it be the hundreds of 'experts' in the lying al-MSM, all the 'experts' who have now been proven incredibly wrong? Again, that would take a courageous adult to do that and there are none of those on the left.
Guess the al-MSM will just bury this one rather than admit to America and to their own supporters that they not only were wrong, but that they KNEW within months of the investigation starting that it was Armitage and deliberately misled their own supporters and real Americans..
Typical, childish and immature response that we have all come to expect from the left.
As much as I dislike the Wilsons, did they know Armitage was the leaker? We haven't heard from them lately...
A Deputy Secretary does not have an unrestricted privilege of disclosing classified information, but his or her scope of discretion is fairly wide with respect to declassifying information, which isn't altogether the same thing. Armitage may or may not be in legal jeopardy from this, and if it was the opinion of counsel that he was that may account for his reticence.
Get Back
Beatles
Jojo was a man who thought he was a loner
But he knew it wouldn't last.
Jojo left his home in tucson, arizona
For some california grass.
Get back, get back.
Get back to where you once belonged
Get back, get back.
Get back to where you once belonged.
Get back jojo. go home
Get back, get back.
Back to where you once belonged
Get back, get back.
Back to where you once belonged.
Get back jo.
The media's illusions of a Dem majority come
election time will be derailed (actually,it was never on track in my opinion) because of stuff
like this. Dems are continuing to shoot themselves
in the foot and it's fun to watch!
"Mr Rove and Mr Libby's guilt was never in doubt. Mr Rove spoke with a Texas accent, Scooter had a silly name. What more proof was needed?"
I liked his analogy of the press here. Got to love those Aussies!
I bet somehow the slimy Wilsons will spin it to their advantage.
Interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.