Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Case Against Rudy Giuliani
Human Events ^ | August 30 2006 | John Hawkins

Posted on 08/30/2006 9:09:02 AM PDT by Reagan Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-484 next last
To: Reagan Man
Thanks for the ping.

And let me add this gasoline to the fire:


Rudy Giuliani:

Read more about Giuliani's liberal positions here.

Some people want Republicans to ignore his liberalism on almost every issue and, as a distraction, they try to pretend that Rudy is fiscally conservative. Again, his record shows that he isn't fiscally conservative either:

According to an article in The Nation from 2002:

It's now apparent that Giuliani purchased the city's good times partially with borrowed money and left his successor, Mike Bloomberg, holding a bag of debt. New York City went from a $3 billion budget surplus in 1998 to a $4.5 billion deficit after Giuliani left office. This mismanagement of prosperity is a big part of his legacy. Giuliani left the city's finances in a mess...

Here are some things Giuliani did as Mayor that were NOT anywhere near being fiscally conservative:

  • New York City went from a $3 billion budget surplus in 1998 to a $4.5 billion deficit after Giuliani left office.
  • Added 25,000 government employees patronage hires to the city's payroll after promising to cut the work force.
  • Giuliani's borrowing practices increased the city's debt burden by 50 percent.
  • Partly because of Giuliani, New York City is now the biggest debtor in the nation outside of the federal government with $42 billion in loans outstanding.

According to the article from The Nation:

During the 1960s Giuliani was a self-described "Robert Kennedy Democrat." He identified with RFK as a liberal Catholic prosecutor. He volunteered for RFK's 1968 presidential campaign while he was a student at NYU Law School. Giuliani also voted for George McGovern in 1972. During the liberal 1960s, he was a liberal.

But in 1975 Giuliani switched his party registration from Democrat to Independent when he got a job in Gerald Ford's Justice Department, according to his mentor Harold "Ace" Tyler.

On December 8, 1980, Giuliani changed his registration from Independent to Republican. This was one month after Ronald Reagan's election, and just as he was applying for a top job in the Justice Department.

So, to sum that up:

He's a liberal. He's not even in the same building as conservative. He's only a Republican because...and this comes from his own mother, Helen Giuliani:

"He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He's definitely not a conservative Republican. He thinks he is, but he isn't. He still feels very sorry for the poor."


41 posted on 08/30/2006 9:40:53 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

He also tried to shut down that disgusting, anti-Catholic art exhibit with the elephant dung and vaginas (something never reported) surrounding the Virgin Mary. He was over-ruled by his own city council.


42 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:07 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Rudy kicked Arafat out of Carnegie Hall. Told him he wasn't invited and had him escorted out.

Rudy ignored the race hustlers, cleaned up their neighborhoods and they still despise him. Got the drug dealers and street pedlars out of the streets in front of their business, they still hate him. He did the right thing with no regard for ratings.

Rudy told the arab sheik to stuff his money after 9/11.

Rudy did what he wanted to do. GOOD FOR HIM

The media in their effort to downplay the President's leadership following 9/11 heaped praise on Rudy. Put him on the cover of Time...Man of the Year.

John McCrazy called him America's Mayor. Hah, now McCain is going to have to beat Rudy at the polls. Ha ha ha ha


43 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:17 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
If a candidate cannot arrive at the correct position on abortion there is very little to indicate he will reach the correct position on most others.

Read the article, Rudy is on the wrong side of abortion, including partial-birth abortion which 80% of the population wants banned, gay marriage, gun rights, and immigration. What kind of judicial appointments should we expect? What has Rudy ever done that would demonstrate an ability to lead on a national level?

He did a nice job with cleaning up NYC and showing leadership in a crisis. So what? So did Haley Barbour and he's right on the issues too.

44 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:28 AM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

And voting on that basis is even dumber than being a one-issue voter.


45 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:02 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: garv

Good luck to you.

Remember to go outside once in a while.


46 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:48 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

You can console yourself the day after Election Day that the President- elect may not be as Conservative on the social issues as you would like but he is a highly competent successful Republican, who will be good on fiscal and many many other issues, will by necessity need to move right for the support of his Party in Congress, and the Nation will be secure under his watch- which should be your number one issue.

Or you can have a Democrat President -elect who will work against all Conservative issues and in addition will not secure the Nation.

That is your choice in 2008 when a there is no Social Conservative candidate who has a shot in hell of winning.


47 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:49 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Bush Doctrine- Old: Fight terrorists. New: Cease fire with terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Folks, this stuff is far worse than the complaints we leveled about big dumb Arnold when he was running. His policies now put him to the left of 99% of Republicans and about 40% of Democrats. I can't imagine how bad Giuliani can get.
48 posted on 08/30/2006 9:43:28 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a starving man needs a tapeworm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
>>>>>I'm reminded of that famous "11th Commandment" of Ronald Reagan...

I keep telling people that Ronald Reagan did not create the phrase, 11th Commandment. Instead it came about during his 1966 run for the California Governorship.

"The personal attacks against me during the primary finally became so heavy that the state Republican chairman, Gaylord Parkinson, postulated what he called the Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican. It's a rule I followed during that campaign and have ever since."

Reagan actually broke his own rule when he ran against PresFord for the GOP nomination in 1976. Reagan criticized Ford during the entire primary season, right up through and including the GOP convention. Reagan was a true gentleman and he wanted everyone to like him, and vote for him. However, when the chips were on the table, Reagan was a tough SOB. Ford found out how tough Reagan was in 1976 campaign,just as George Bush found out how tough Reagan was in the 1980 campaign for Prez. Politics isn't for the thin skinned, or the faint of heart. If Giuliani wants to be POTUS, he's gonna have to fight for it.

49 posted on 08/30/2006 9:43:50 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

My goodness - so I guess we can count on your to stay and home and watch TV on election day?


50 posted on 08/30/2006 9:44:32 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
I guess now that trashing McCain has worn itself out, it's on to trashing Guiliani. I guess people won't be happy until they've nominated Foot in the Mouth Allen so we can spend all of 2008 defending his "macaca" slip up...if he even ends up surviving his Senate race now. Good job guys.

If you like Giuliani and McCain there's a party where you can get all fo that crap, all the time.

51 posted on 08/30/2006 9:44:47 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a starving man needs a tapeworm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: midnightcat
NYC was a disaster until he came on board.

And NYC's finances and debt burden were a disaster by time he left office. Some fiscal conservative...

Pro-law enforcement!? That's why he made NYC into a sanctuary city for tens of thousands of criminal illegal aliens and refused to comply with Federal law requring local law enforcement to cooperate with the INS in enforcement of the law. He went so far as to sue the Federal Government in an attempt to legally ignore the law and when he lost he refused to comply anyway. So, he cleaned out the bums and hookers from the most visible parts of NYC and enjoyed the national downward trend in crime that preceded his administration. I'm not all that impressed, to say the least.

52 posted on 08/30/2006 9:45:35 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
The fact that Rudy Giuliani did a marvelous job running New York City has nothing to do with his qualifications to be the Republican candidate for the White House in 2008.

In fact, I'd suggest it's actually the opposite . . . Doing an admirable job in running a radical leftist rat-hole like New York City ought to disqualify him from any consideration for the top of the GOP ticket.

53 posted on 08/30/2006 9:45:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
It's "scarey" that some people believe that our most fundamental right, the right to life is important? These are "scarey" people? That's part of the Republican platform. How will the platform look with you liberals rewriting it guilianni style?

He does support partial birth abortion. (AKA 'sucking the brains from a fully formed baby'.) Which a large majority of Americans don't.

You leftists are all cranks, no matter what you call yourselves.

54 posted on 08/30/2006 9:46:46 AM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Come on into the Republican Party everyone..

Now - think the way we do - or get out.

Nice


55 posted on 08/30/2006 9:47:17 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey
Here's a reason I will be opposing Rudy Giuliani:


56 posted on 08/30/2006 9:47:39 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

Great reply. Perhaps someday you can formulate a coherent reason to actually vote for someone.


57 posted on 08/30/2006 9:48:54 AM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

Ok - I get it , I get it , I get it.

Let me ask one question. If abortion is your holy grail.

WHY HAS GWB not made it his lead issue, every day in every way. Answer: It's not the President role.

Raise your family the right way and abortion will never be issue.


58 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:09 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Yeah we know. But the fact remains that despite all that, an awful lot of FReepers are willing to support Rudy. And almost no one can stand McCain even though he has a high score from the ACU. Speaks volumes if you ask me.

I will say it again. Rudy is the new teflon candidate.


59 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:26 AM PDT by freespirited (We have met the enemy and it is Wal-Mart. ---The Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; Spiff; jla; conservativecorner; Condor51; Doohickey; upchuck; don-o

Giuliani oughta be nailed for identity theft-----for trying to profit himself, posing as a conservative.


60 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:47 AM PDT by Liz (The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson