Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Case Against Rudy Giuliani
Human Events ^ | August 30 2006 | John Hawkins

Posted on 08/30/2006 9:09:02 AM PDT by Reagan Man

Rudy Giuliani, a contender for the presidency in 2008, is receiving an inordinate amount of positive attention. That's quite understandable since Rudy is charismatic, did a great job on the campaign trail for President Bush in 2004, and his phenomenal performance after 9/11 was much appreciated. However, likeable or not, having Rudy as the GOP's candidate in 2008 would be a big mistake. Here's a short, but sweet primer on some of Rudy's many flaws.

Rudy's Strong Pro-Abortion Stance

As these comments from a 1989 conversation with Phil Donahue show, Rudy Giuliani is staunchly in favor of abortion:

"I've said that I'll uphold a woman's right of choice, that I will fund abortion so that a poor woman is not deprived of a right that others can exercise, and that I would oppose going back to a day in which abortions were illegal.

I do that in spite of my own personal reservations. I have a daughter now; if a close relative or a daughter were pregnant, I would give my personal advice, my religious and moral views ...

Donahue: Which would be to continue the pregnancy.

Giuliani: Which would be that I would help her with taking care of the baby. But if the ultimate choice of the woman - my daughter or any other woman - would be that in this particular circumstance [if she had] to have an abortion, I'd support that. I'd give my daughter the money for it."

Worse yet, Giuliani even supports partial birth abortion:

"I'm pro-choice. I'm pro-gay rights,Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. "No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing," he responded." -- CNN.com, "Inside Politics" Dec 2, 1999

It's bad enough that Rudy is so adamantly pro-abortion, but consider what that could mean when it comes time to select Supreme Court Justices. Does the description of Giuliani that you've just read make you think he's going to select an originalist like Clarence Thomas, who would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade -- or does it make you think he would prefer justices like Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy who'd leave Roe v. Wade in place?

Rudy's abortion stance is bad news for conservatives who are pro-life or who are concerned about getting originalist judges on the Supreme Court.

An Anti-Second Amendment Candidate

In the last couple of election cycles, 2nd Amendment issues have moved to the back burner mainly because even Democratic candidates have learned that being tagged with the "gun grabber" label is political poison.

Unfortunately, Rudy Giuliani is a proponent of gun control who supported the Brady Bill and the Assault Weapon Ban.

Do Republicans really want to abandon their strong 2nd Amendment stance by selecting a pro-gun control nominee?

Soft on Gay Marriage

Other than tax cuts, the biggest domestic issue of the 2004 election was President Bush's support of a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as being between a man and a woman. Unfortunately, Rudy Giuliani has taken a "Kerryesque" position on gay marriage.

Although Rudy, like John Kerry, has said that marriage should remain between a man and a woman, he also supports civil unions, "marched in gay-pride parades ...dressed up in drag on national television for a skit on Saturday Night Live (and moved in with a) wealthy gay couple" after his divorce. He also very vocally opposed running on a gay marriage amendment:

His thoughts on the gay-marriage amendment? "I don't think you should run a campaign on this issue," he told the Daily News earlier this month. "I think it would be a mistake for anybody to run a campaign on it -- the Democrats, the president, or anybody else."

Here's more from the New York Daily News:

"Rudy Giuliani came out yesterday against President Bush's call for a ban on gay marriage.

The former mayor, who Vice President Cheney joked the other night is after his job, vigorously defended the President on his post-9/11 leadership but made clear he disagrees with Bush's proposal to rewrite the Constitution to outlaw gays and lesbians from tying the knot.

"I don't think it's ripe for decision at this point," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"I certainly wouldn't support [a ban] at this time," added Giuliani..."

Although Rudy may grudgingly say he doesn't support gay marriage (and it would be political suicide for him to do otherwise), where he really stands on the issue is an open question.

Pro-Illegal Immigration

As Tom Bevan of RealClearPolitics has pointed out, Rudy is an adherent of the same approach to illegal immigration that John McCain, Ted Kennedy, George Bush, and Harry Reid have championed:

"While McCain has taken heat for his support of comprehensive immigration reform, Rudy is every bit as pro-immigration as McCain - if not more so. On the O'Reilly Factor last week Giuliani argued for a "practical approach" to immigration and cited his efforts as Mayor of New York City to "regularize" illegal immigrants by providing them with access to city services like public education to "make their lives reasonable." Giuliani did say that "a tremendous amount of money should be put into the physical security" needed to stop the flow of illegal immigrants coming across the border, but his overall position on immigration is essentially indistinguishable from McCain's."

That's bad enough. But, as Michelle Malkin has revealed, under Giuliani, New York was an illegal alien sanctuary and "America's Mayor" actually sued the federal government in an effort to keep New York City employees from having to cooperate with the INS:

"When Congress enacted immigration reform laws that forbade local governments from barring employees from cooperating with the INS, Mayor Rudy Giuliani filed suit against the feds in 1997. He was rebuffed by two lower courts, which ruled that the sanctuary order amounted to special treatment for illegal aliens and were nothing more than an unlawful effort to flaunt federal enforcement efforts against illegal aliens. In January 2000, the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, but Giuliani vowed to ignore the law."

If you agree with the way that Nancy Pelosi and Company deal with illegal immigration, then you'll find the way that Rudy Giuliani tackles the issue to be right down your alley.

A More Charismatic Version of Arlen Specter

Rudy Giuliani may have many fine qualities, but he is not a conservative, nor has he always been a loyal Republican.

For example, back in the mid-nineties, when he was actually running New York City, Rudy could have fairly been said to have governed as a moderate at best and to the left-of-center at worst:

* "The National Journal’s rating system put him at 56 percent conservative and 44 percent liberal on economic issues in 1996 and assessed him as liberal by 59 to 40 percent in looking at his social issues votes."

The New York Observer also had a very interesting selection of quotes from and about Rudy over the years that may give his conservative supporters more than a little pause. Here are a few of those quotations:

* Some ask, How can the Liberal Party support a candidate who disagrees with the Liberal Party position on so many gut issues? But when the Liberal Party Policy Committee reviewed a list of key social issues of deep concern to progressive New Yorkers, we found that Rudy Giuliani agreed with the Liberal Party's stance on a majority of such issues. He agreed with the Liberal Party's views on affirmative action, gay rights, gun control, school prayer and tuition tax credits. As Mayor, Rudy Giuliani would uphold the Constitutional and legal rights to abortion. -- N.Y.S. Liberal Party Endorsement Statement of R. Giuliani for Mayor of New York City April 8, 1989

* Mr. Rockefeller represented "a tradition in the Republican Party I've worked hard to re-kindle - the Rockefeller, Javits, Lefkowitz tradition." -- Rudy Giuliani, New York Times, July 9, 1992

* What kind of Republican? Is [Giuliani], for instance, a Reagan Republican? [Giuliani] pauses before answering: "I'm a Republican." -- Village Voice, January 24, 1989

* "Shortly before his last-minute endorsement of Bob Dole in the 1996 presidential election, [Giuliani] told the Post's Jack Newfield that "most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." The Daily News quoted [Giuliani] as saying that March: "Whether you talk about President Clinton, Senator Dole.... The country would be in very good hands in the hands of any of that group."

* Revealing at one point that he was "open" to the idea of endorsing Clinton, he explained: "When I ran for mayor both times, '89 and '93, I promised people that I would be, if not bipartisan, at least open to the possibility of supporting Democrats." -- Rudy - An Investigative Biography of Rudolph Giuliani, Wayne Barrett, Page 459

* "From my point of view as the mayor of New York City, the question that I have to ask is, 'Who has the best chance in the next four years of successfully fighting for our interest? Who understands them, and who will make the best case for it?' Our future, our destiny is not a matter of chance. It's a matter of choice. My choice is Mario Cuomo." -- Rudy Giuliani: Emperor of the City, Andrew Kirtzman, Page 133

* "[Quite] frankly, you have to understand the fact that Rudy Giuliani was a McGovern Democrat, he was endorsed by the Liberal Party when he ran for Mayor. In his heart, he's a Democrat. He's paraded all over this country with Bill Clinton and, in fact, he's very comfortable with Mario Cuomo. But what Rudy Giuliani wants is to be bailed out in the city, in the mess he's in, and everybody understands very clearly in politics that they struck a deal, that Mario's going to continue to be the big spender, save Rudy the options of raising taxes by pouring money statewide into the City of New York and bailing it out. Quite frankly, I predict that he will join the Democratic Party." -- Interview with Michael Long, Chairman N.Y.S., Conservative Party, CNN Crossfire, October 25, 1994

Does this really sound like the sort of candidate we want as a standard bearer for the Republican Party?

He Can't Keep His Pants Up

There has only been one man who has ever made it to the White House after being divorced and that was Ronald Reagan, who had been married to Nancy for more than 25 years before his campaign in 1980. Rudy, on the other hand, is on his third wife.

Furthermore, his second divorce from Donna Hanover was extremely ugly. Hanover accused Rudy of "open and notorious adultery." She also claimed Rudy had an affair with a staffer, Christyne Lategano-Nicholas, which both Giuliani and Lategano-Nicholas denied. However, Rudy has acknowledged that he started seeing his current wife, Judith Nathan, before his divorce from Hanover was finalized in 2002.

Given how recent this divorce was, Rudy's adultery, and the fact that he married, "the other woman," the press can be expected to cover Rudy's marriage to Hanover exhaustively if he gets the nomination and needless to say, Rudy, quite deservedly, will not come off very well.

Does He Have The Judgment To Be President?

As you've just seen, Rudy hasn't necessarily made the best decisions in his personal life. Unfortunately, the Bernard Kerik incident shows that Giuliani's poor judgment can spill over into political matters as well.

Rudy recommended his friend and business partner, Bernard Kerik, for the position of Homeland Security Secretary and the Bush administration, perhaps because Rudy vouched for him, didn't do a very thorough job of vetting him.

Soon after Kerik's nomination became public, allegations surfaced that Kerik was having two simultaneous affairs, had ties to a construction company "linked to the mob," and had an illegal alien nanny whose taxes hadn't been paid. Under fire from the press, Kerik withdrew his name from consideration for the Homeland Security position and the Bush administration was left with egg on its face for putting up such a scandal ridden nominee.

While the whole debacle was embarrassing for the Bush Administration, it raised even more serious questions about Rudy. After all, if Bernard Kerik is the sort of person Rudy sees as an appropriate friend, business partner, and nominee to run the Homeland Security Department, it makes you wonder what kind of people he is surrounding himself with on a day to day basis.

How Electable Is Rudy Giuliani Really?

One of the biggest selling points for Rudy Giuliani is supposed to be that he's "electable" because a lot of independents and Democrats will vote for him. The problem with that sort of thinking is that if he becomes the Republican nominee, the very liberal mainstream media will spend nine months relentlessly savaging him in an effort to help the Democrats. Because of that, Giuliani's sky high polling numbers with non-Republicans are 100% guaranteed to drop significantly before election time rolls around in 2008.

That is not necessarily a problem; after all the mainstream media is always against the Republican nominee, if -- and this is a big "if" -- the GOP nominee has strong support from the Republican base.

The big problem Rudy has is that he isn't going to be able to generate that kind of support. For one thing, as a candidate, he offers almost nothing to social conservatives, without whom a victory for George Bush in 2004 wouldn't have been possible. If the choice in 2008 comes down to a Democrat and a pro-abortion, soft on gay marriage, left-of-center candidate on social issues -- like Rudy -- you can be sure that millions of "moral values voters" will simply stay home and cost the GOP the election.

The other issue is in the South. George Bush swept every Southern state in 2000 and 2004, which is quite an impressive feat when you consider that the Democrats had Southerner Al Gore at the top of the ticket in 2000 and John Edwards as the veep in 2004. Unfortunately, a pro-abortion, soft on gay marriage, pro-gun control RINO from New York City just isn't going to be able to repeat that performance. Even against a carpetbagger like Hillary Clinton, it's entirely likely that you'll see at least 2 or 3 states in the South turn from red to blue if Rudy Giuliani is the nominee.

Also, the reason why George Bush's approval numbers have been mired in the high thirties/low forties of late is because he has lost a significant amount of Republican support, primarily because his domestic policies aren't considered conservative enough. Since that's the case, running a candidate who is several steps to Bush's left on domestic policy certainly doesn't seem like a great way to unite the base again.

Conclusion

Despite all of his charisma and the wonderful leadership he showed after 9/11, Rudy Giuliani is not a Reagan Republican. To the contrary, Giuliani is another Christie Todd Whitman, another Arlen Specter, another Olympia Snowe. He's a throwback to the "bad old days" before Reagan, when the GOP was run by moderate Country Club Republicans who considered conservatives to be extremists. Trying to revive that failed strategy again is likely to lead to a Democratic President in 2008 and numerous setbacks for the Republican Party.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; 2008; angrypaleos; antigun; banglist; buchananites; dangerrinosinheat; fauxrepublican; fuggetaboutitrudy; gay; ghouliesarerinos; giuliani; giulianitruthfile; newyorkmoonbats; pitchforkers; rmthread; rudy; rudylegacy; rudytheliberal; singleissuevoters; spite; thebitterfew; unappeaseables; whenghouliesattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-484 next last
To: Reagan Man
Thanks for the ping.

And let me add this gasoline to the fire:


Rudy Giuliani:

Read more about Giuliani's liberal positions here.

Some people want Republicans to ignore his liberalism on almost every issue and, as a distraction, they try to pretend that Rudy is fiscally conservative. Again, his record shows that he isn't fiscally conservative either:

According to an article in The Nation from 2002:

It's now apparent that Giuliani purchased the city's good times partially with borrowed money and left his successor, Mike Bloomberg, holding a bag of debt. New York City went from a $3 billion budget surplus in 1998 to a $4.5 billion deficit after Giuliani left office. This mismanagement of prosperity is a big part of his legacy. Giuliani left the city's finances in a mess...

Here are some things Giuliani did as Mayor that were NOT anywhere near being fiscally conservative:

  • New York City went from a $3 billion budget surplus in 1998 to a $4.5 billion deficit after Giuliani left office.
  • Added 25,000 government employees patronage hires to the city's payroll after promising to cut the work force.
  • Giuliani's borrowing practices increased the city's debt burden by 50 percent.
  • Partly because of Giuliani, New York City is now the biggest debtor in the nation outside of the federal government with $42 billion in loans outstanding.

According to the article from The Nation:

During the 1960s Giuliani was a self-described "Robert Kennedy Democrat." He identified with RFK as a liberal Catholic prosecutor. He volunteered for RFK's 1968 presidential campaign while he was a student at NYU Law School. Giuliani also voted for George McGovern in 1972. During the liberal 1960s, he was a liberal.

But in 1975 Giuliani switched his party registration from Democrat to Independent when he got a job in Gerald Ford's Justice Department, according to his mentor Harold "Ace" Tyler.

On December 8, 1980, Giuliani changed his registration from Independent to Republican. This was one month after Ronald Reagan's election, and just as he was applying for a top job in the Justice Department.

So, to sum that up:

He's a liberal. He's not even in the same building as conservative. He's only a Republican because...and this comes from his own mother, Helen Giuliani:

"He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He's definitely not a conservative Republican. He thinks he is, but he isn't. He still feels very sorry for the poor."


41 posted on 08/30/2006 9:40:53 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

He also tried to shut down that disgusting, anti-Catholic art exhibit with the elephant dung and vaginas (something never reported) surrounding the Virgin Mary. He was over-ruled by his own city council.


42 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:07 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Rudy kicked Arafat out of Carnegie Hall. Told him he wasn't invited and had him escorted out.

Rudy ignored the race hustlers, cleaned up their neighborhoods and they still despise him. Got the drug dealers and street pedlars out of the streets in front of their business, they still hate him. He did the right thing with no regard for ratings.

Rudy told the arab sheik to stuff his money after 9/11.

Rudy did what he wanted to do. GOOD FOR HIM

The media in their effort to downplay the President's leadership following 9/11 heaped praise on Rudy. Put him on the cover of Time...Man of the Year.

John McCrazy called him America's Mayor. Hah, now McCain is going to have to beat Rudy at the polls. Ha ha ha ha


43 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:17 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
If a candidate cannot arrive at the correct position on abortion there is very little to indicate he will reach the correct position on most others.

Read the article, Rudy is on the wrong side of abortion, including partial-birth abortion which 80% of the population wants banned, gay marriage, gun rights, and immigration. What kind of judicial appointments should we expect? What has Rudy ever done that would demonstrate an ability to lead on a national level?

He did a nice job with cleaning up NYC and showing leadership in a crisis. So what? So did Haley Barbour and he's right on the issues too.

44 posted on 08/30/2006 9:41:28 AM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Marius3188

And voting on that basis is even dumber than being a one-issue voter.


45 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:02 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: garv

Good luck to you.

Remember to go outside once in a while.


46 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:48 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

You can console yourself the day after Election Day that the President- elect may not be as Conservative on the social issues as you would like but he is a highly competent successful Republican, who will be good on fiscal and many many other issues, will by necessity need to move right for the support of his Party in Congress, and the Nation will be secure under his watch- which should be your number one issue.

Or you can have a Democrat President -elect who will work against all Conservative issues and in addition will not secure the Nation.

That is your choice in 2008 when a there is no Social Conservative candidate who has a shot in hell of winning.


47 posted on 08/30/2006 9:42:49 AM PDT by Sabramerican (Bush Doctrine- Old: Fight terrorists. New: Cease fire with terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Folks, this stuff is far worse than the complaints we leveled about big dumb Arnold when he was running. His policies now put him to the left of 99% of Republicans and about 40% of Democrats. I can't imagine how bad Giuliani can get.
48 posted on 08/30/2006 9:43:28 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a starving man needs a tapeworm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
>>>>>I'm reminded of that famous "11th Commandment" of Ronald Reagan...

I keep telling people that Ronald Reagan did not create the phrase, 11th Commandment. Instead it came about during his 1966 run for the California Governorship.

"The personal attacks against me during the primary finally became so heavy that the state Republican chairman, Gaylord Parkinson, postulated what he called the Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican. It's a rule I followed during that campaign and have ever since."

Reagan actually broke his own rule when he ran against PresFord for the GOP nomination in 1976. Reagan criticized Ford during the entire primary season, right up through and including the GOP convention. Reagan was a true gentleman and he wanted everyone to like him, and vote for him. However, when the chips were on the table, Reagan was a tough SOB. Ford found out how tough Reagan was in 1976 campaign,just as George Bush found out how tough Reagan was in the 1980 campaign for Prez. Politics isn't for the thin skinned, or the faint of heart. If Giuliani wants to be POTUS, he's gonna have to fight for it.

49 posted on 08/30/2006 9:43:50 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

My goodness - so I guess we can count on your to stay and home and watch TV on election day?


50 posted on 08/30/2006 9:44:32 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
I guess now that trashing McCain has worn itself out, it's on to trashing Guiliani. I guess people won't be happy until they've nominated Foot in the Mouth Allen so we can spend all of 2008 defending his "macaca" slip up...if he even ends up surviving his Senate race now. Good job guys.

If you like Giuliani and McCain there's a party where you can get all fo that crap, all the time.

51 posted on 08/30/2006 9:44:47 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a starving man needs a tapeworm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: midnightcat
NYC was a disaster until he came on board.

And NYC's finances and debt burden were a disaster by time he left office. Some fiscal conservative...

Pro-law enforcement!? That's why he made NYC into a sanctuary city for tens of thousands of criminal illegal aliens and refused to comply with Federal law requring local law enforcement to cooperate with the INS in enforcement of the law. He went so far as to sue the Federal Government in an attempt to legally ignore the law and when he lost he refused to comply anyway. So, he cleaned out the bums and hookers from the most visible parts of NYC and enjoyed the national downward trend in crime that preceded his administration. I'm not all that impressed, to say the least.

52 posted on 08/30/2006 9:45:35 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: romanesq
The fact that Rudy Giuliani did a marvelous job running New York City has nothing to do with his qualifications to be the Republican candidate for the White House in 2008.

In fact, I'd suggest it's actually the opposite . . . Doing an admirable job in running a radical leftist rat-hole like New York City ought to disqualify him from any consideration for the top of the GOP ticket.

53 posted on 08/30/2006 9:45:39 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
It's "scarey" that some people believe that our most fundamental right, the right to life is important? These are "scarey" people? That's part of the Republican platform. How will the platform look with you liberals rewriting it guilianni style?

He does support partial birth abortion. (AKA 'sucking the brains from a fully formed baby'.) Which a large majority of Americans don't.

You leftists are all cranks, no matter what you call yourselves.

54 posted on 08/30/2006 9:46:46 AM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Come on into the Republican Party everyone..

Now - think the way we do - or get out.

Nice


55 posted on 08/30/2006 9:47:17 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: BaBaStooey
Here's a reason I will be opposing Rudy Giuliani:


56 posted on 08/30/2006 9:47:39 AM PDT by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

Great reply. Perhaps someday you can formulate a coherent reason to actually vote for someone.


57 posted on 08/30/2006 9:48:54 AM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

Ok - I get it , I get it , I get it.

Let me ask one question. If abortion is your holy grail.

WHY HAS GWB not made it his lead issue, every day in every way. Answer: It's not the President role.

Raise your family the right way and abortion will never be issue.


58 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:09 AM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Yeah we know. But the fact remains that despite all that, an awful lot of FReepers are willing to support Rudy. And almost no one can stand McCain even though he has a high score from the ACU. Speaks volumes if you ask me.

I will say it again. Rudy is the new teflon candidate.


59 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:26 AM PDT by freespirited (We have met the enemy and it is Wal-Mart. ---The Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; Spiff; jla; conservativecorner; Condor51; Doohickey; upchuck; don-o

Giuliani oughta be nailed for identity theft-----for trying to profit himself, posing as a conservative.


60 posted on 08/30/2006 9:49:47 AM PDT by Liz (The US Constitution is intended to protect the people from the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson