Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Senate Poll: Cantwell (D) 56%, McGavick (R) 39% (Survey USA)
SurveyUSA ^ | 28 August 2006 | SurveyUSA

Posted on 08/29/2006 4:12:21 PM PDT by okstate

In a November Head-to-Head, Cantwell Defeats McGavick:

In a hypothetical head-to-head matchup in Washington today, 8/28/06, incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell beats Republican challenger Mike McGavick, 56% to 39%, according to a SurveyUSA poll of 808 Registered Voters conducted exclusively for KING-TV Seattle. Cantwell leads by 29 points among women and by 4 points among men, a 25-point "gender gap." Cantwell leads among Democrats 15:1. McGavick leads among Republicans 7:1. Independents favor Cantwell 3:2. Those who approve of President George W. Bush's job performance choose McGavick 80% to 16%. Those who disapprove of Bush's performance choose Cantwell 81% to 14%. President Bush's approval rating among Registered Voters in Washington is 35%. The election is on 11/7/06.

Filtering:

1,000 Washington adults were interviewed 8/25/06 - 8/27/06. Of them, 808 were registered to vote. Crosstabs reflect Registered Voters. This survey did not attempt to identify or screen for "Likely Voters." The Washington State Primary to determine the party nominees is 9/19/06. After the Primary, research by SurveyUSA in this state will be of Likely Voters.

808 Registered Voters
Margin of Sampling Error: 3.5%

McGavick (R) 39%
Cantwell (D) 56%
Undecided 5%

Extremely detailed crosstabs are displayed at the link.

Partisan breakdown is 38% D, 30% R, 26% I.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2006polls; cantwell; election2006; electioncongress; elections2006; electionscongress; mcgavick; surveyusa; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
This poll was conducted entirely after the news of McGavick's DWI came out. Granted, it's a poll of registered voters, but even an RV-LV disconnect can't explain away a 17 point lead. Survey USA has not polled WA yet in this election cycle. The only other companies to do so are Strategic Vision and Rasmussen.

Rasmussen trendlines:
3-07 Cantwell +13
4-04 Cantwell +8
5-08 Cantwell +5
6-13 Cantwell +4
7-17 Cantwell +11
8-15 Rasmussen +6

Strategic Vision trendlines:
3-26 Cantwell +10
4-23 Cantwell +8
5-21 Cantwell +5
6-25 Cantwell +4
7-23 Cantwell +4
8-27 Cantwell +5

SurveyUSA is usually pretty accurate, so either this poll is just an outlier or the DWI revelation is hurting McGavick seriously.

1 posted on 08/29/2006 4:12:25 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: okstate

Sorry, that last Rasmussen poll should read "8-15 Cantwell +6"


2 posted on 08/29/2006 4:16:56 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okstate

I'm sure they picked some totally unbiased place like Capitol Hill or Fremont to poll these people.

This stinks worse than Zogby's mega barfers.



3 posted on 08/29/2006 4:17:05 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okstate

Survey USA is normally quite reliable, so this is not good news for that Senate race.


4 posted on 08/29/2006 4:18:07 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

The crosstabs at the link are divided geographically. There are a lot of people from Seattle, but that might be how Washington state really votes. I don't know much about WA politics.


5 posted on 08/29/2006 4:20:18 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Hate to see this. Corruption and lying 58% with Honesty at 39%.


6 posted on 08/29/2006 4:22:08 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okstate

Well, I strongly doubt the polls, but if they turn out to be even close to reality, that State deserves every bit of socialist BS they have to live with.


7 posted on 08/29/2006 4:25:18 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okstate

Why the heck didn't McGavick reveal this DUI before getting into the race?


8 posted on 08/29/2006 4:27:59 PM PDT by B Knotts (Newt '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

I know at least one of the earlier WA polls I saw showed the Green Party (I think) candidate pulling 5%, which I figured would eventually end up in Cantwell's column.


9 posted on 08/29/2006 4:29:43 PM PDT by Coop (No, there are no @!%$&#*! polls on Irey vs. Murtha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I was surveyed for this. In fact, I've been surveyed twice in the last few weeks. The first was done for Darcy Burner's campaign. The second was this.

What's odd...is that I recognized the same voice. The same company polled both. I don't think it's a viable poll.

10 posted on 08/29/2006 4:30:02 PM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okstate

He's probably not helped himself with his lame commercials.


11 posted on 08/29/2006 4:31:22 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: okstate

There is no way in hell that Cantwell will beat McGavick in Eastern WA. When I saw these numbers, I knew this poll was a pile of bs.
Eastern WA = Cantwell 54% - McGavick - 42%??????

This poll is a trainwreck. I'm sure none of those polled from Seattle Metro was from Bellevue or Redmond. They probably did the polling down by Pike Place Market.

"Hey you with the ten face piercings and mohawk day, who would you vote for????"


13 posted on 08/29/2006 4:35:35 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: okstate

Survey USA is a CRAP polling firm.

A chimp throwing feces at a wall is more accurate.


14 posted on 08/29/2006 4:40:43 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

If you recognized an actual voice you weren't polled for this, I don't think.

SurveyUSA, like Rasmussen, uses what's called "robot polling". The voices are computer-generated.

Polling experts are still debating whether or not this robot polling is more accurate than using actual interviewers, but if SurveyUSA and Rasmussen's performances in 2004 are any indication, robot polling is the way of the future.


15 posted on 08/29/2006 4:40:56 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

That statement is completely incorrect. SurveyUSA, Rasmussen, and Mason-Dixon were the most accurate pollsters in 2004.


16 posted on 08/29/2006 4:41:26 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okstate

Rasmussen and Mason-Dixon yes.

Survey USA - NO.


17 posted on 08/29/2006 4:43:47 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

Hey! I resent that. A vast majority of this state is run around with a ring through our nose by the middle of a corrupt and stinking King County.

Leave the rest of us out of it.


18 posted on 08/29/2006 4:45:59 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Just like clockwork, the liberal media starts unleashing its biased polls trying to influence another election.


19 posted on 08/29/2006 4:46:25 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Whats the story on the DUI?


20 posted on 08/29/2006 4:47:38 PM PDT by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson