To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A bullet would've served the a-hole better.
2 posted on
08/28/2006 8:29:06 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(Take me drunk, I'm home now........)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
lets have him test one of his own bombs in an empty field..
3 posted on
08/28/2006 8:29:27 PM PDT by
Wil H
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Even with both arms and legs tied behind their backs, America's Military is still the best in the world.
and that is great news.
4 posted on
08/28/2006 8:30:05 PM PDT by
no-to-illegals
( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
To: NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Dog; Coop; Cap Huff; Gucho; TexKat
Big Catch....didn't see this posted ....why is this from the Turkish Press?
Caldwell was on C-SPAN with the usual suspect reporters trying to execute a gotcha with timelines on when will the Iraqi's be doing everything with no help from the US etc!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"He said the captured individual was also close to the Abu Ayyub al-Masri, who allegedly took charged of Al-Qaeda's Iraqi subsididary following the June 7 death of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi." Getting close to al-Masri?
6 posted on
08/28/2006 8:31:47 PM PDT by
blam
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog; blam; Marine_Uncle
![](http://webpages.charter.net/aircover/USAflag.gif)
Nice catch!
8 posted on
08/28/2006 8:35:04 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hunt em, find em, sniff em out, kill em. Laugh over their rotting corpses. Take video of laughing over rotting corpses. Send it to Al Jazeera, CBS, NBS, Reuters.
9 posted on
08/28/2006 8:35:19 PM PDT by
shankbear
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
This is getting good.......
12 posted on
08/28/2006 8:38:29 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I hope he was turned over to the Iraqi'a for interrogation. This is a job for pliars and blowtorch.
13 posted on
08/28/2006 8:38:31 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Democrats. French, but more cowardly.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They should have shot him dead.
14 posted on
08/28/2006 8:39:53 PM PDT by
hershey
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
15 posted on
08/28/2006 8:40:03 PM PDT by
Gucho
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Apache have not had any "fun" for 150 years.
Let them rejoice!
18 posted on
08/28/2006 8:56:19 PM PDT by
Prost1
((We can build a wall, we can evict - "Si, se puede!"))
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From MR NEAL BOORTZ"
WHY THE DEMOCRATS ARE SITTING THIS ONE OUT
It should be clear that the Democrat Party simply does not want to be engaged in the war against Islamic fascism. The Democrat Party is clearly becoming the Democrat-Appeasement Party. Good for the Islamic murderers. Bad for us.
Why, though, do the Democrats find it so terribly difficult -- almost impossible -- to even so much as admit that we are actually in a hot, shooting war with Islamic fascism? They simply view this as something that can be settled if we just sit down, be nice, and talk a lot.
Noodle it out. It's all about power. Political power. Regaining power and then retaining it.
Democrats know that the voting public views the Republicans as more likely to act to defend our country when we are under threat. The trick, then, is to make sure that the voters don't feel we're under a threat. Democrats know that if the voters come to understand that there is a grave threat to the security of the American people -- a threat, for instance, from Iran's nuclear program, and from Islamic radicals around the world -- then these voters are not going to be likely to vote for a party that they view as weak on defending America.
Democrats like John Kerry are trying to convince the people that Islamic terrorism is no more than a simple law enforcement problem. Find them. Arrest them. Try them. Jail them. Oh, and by the way, make sure they get their full plate of Constitutional rights in the process ... even though they most certainly aren't entitled to them.
Listen to these appeasers! "The war in Iraq is wrong." "We need to talk to Iran." "We need to make Israel stop killing all those innocent civilians."
Listen, friends. There is no "war in Iraq." There is no "War in Afghanistan." There's the Iraq front and the Afghan front in the world-wide war against Islamic fascism. Instinctively, you know this.
That's what scares the Democrat-Appeasement party so much
23 posted on
08/28/2006 9:16:24 PM PDT by
WOSG
(Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Interesting news. But how come we have to always find this kind of stuff out by reading foreign newspapers?
The MSM NEVER prints any of this information.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
U.S. Military take Al-Qaeda terrorist who is a "bombmaker suspected of orchestrating some of the most horrific bomb attacks" in Iraq.
Caldwell said he is considered an "explosive expert producing suicide vests, improvised-explosive-devices and detonation devices and is known to have facilitated the movement of high level leaders of Al-Qaeda in Iraq."
He said the captured individual was also close to the Abu Ayyub al-Masri, who allegedly took charged of Al-Qaeda's Iraqi subsididary following the June 7 death of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
HUH.
But the Democrats will claim Iraq has nothin to do with the war on terror ... NONSENSE.
From MR NEAL BOORTZ"
WHY THE DEMOCRATS ARE SITTING THIS ONE OUT
It should be clear that the Democrat Party simply does not want to be engaged in the war against Islamic fascism. The Democrat Party is clearly becoming the Democrat-Appeasement Party. Good for the Islamic murderers. Bad for us.
Why, though, do the Democrats find it so terribly difficult -- almost impossible -- to even so much as admit that we are actually in a hot, shooting war with Islamic fascism? They simply view this as something that can be settled if we just sit down, be nice, and talk a lot.
Noodle it out. It's all about power. Political power. Regaining power and then retaining it.
Democrats know that the voting public views the Republicans as more likely to act to defend our country when we are under threat. The trick, then, is to make sure that the voters don't feel we're under a threat. Democrats know that if the voters come to understand that there is a grave threat to the security of the American people -- a threat, for instance, from Iran's nuclear program, and from Islamic radicals around the world -- then these voters are not going to be likely to vote for a party that they view as weak on defending America.
Democrats like John Kerry are trying to convince the people that Islamic terrorism is no more than a simple law enforcement problem. Find them. Arrest them. Try them. Jail them. Oh, and by the way, make sure they get their full plate of Constitutional rights in the process ... even though they most certainly aren't entitled to them.
Listen to these appeasers! "The war in Iraq is wrong." "We need to talk to Iran." "We need to make Israel stop killing all those innocent civilians."
Listen, friends. There is no "war in Iraq." There is no "War in Afghanistan." There's the Iraq front and the Afghan front in the world-wide war against Islamic fascism. Instinctively, you know this.
That's what scares the Democrat-Appeasement party so much
25 posted on
08/28/2006 9:18:56 PM PDT by
WOSG
(Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; bentfeather; tomkow6; E.G.C.; StarCMC; ...
32 posted on
08/29/2006 6:36:02 AM PDT by
beachn4fun
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace.” ….George Washington)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson