Posted on 08/27/2006 10:53:33 AM PDT by goldstategop
Likewise, I've been reading the imaginative arguments from the "No on 90" committee. Proposition 90, slated for the November ballot, would ban the use of eminent domain for private uses – i.e., the transfer of your home to Costco – and would make governments pay compensation when they use regulations to steal property – i.e., the city of Brea's theft of millions of dollars in property by downzoning it so virtually nothing can be built on the land.
Most Californians, liberal and conservative, would no doubt agree with the fundamental principles here. Yet a coalition of organizations in the anti-90 campaign is claiming that these simple protections that would be afforded regular Californians if the initiative passes are really a "taxpayer trap." The groups on the list usually are in the forefront of calling for more taxes. Somehow, we're supposed to forget about the endless sea of parcel taxes, spending plans and bond measures that these groups lobby for, and believe that they are now the friend of the taxpayer.
These organizations include the League of Women Voters, the California Labor Federation, the Sierra Club, the League of California Cities, Environmental Defense, Consumers First, Santa Monica Coalition for a Livable City, San Francisco Tenants Union, the American Planning Association and on and on.
The government advocacy groups want to be able to take property at their whim. They like being able to condemn neighborhoods to build theme parks, auto malls and big-box stores. The public-sector unions are able to constantly ratchet up their pensions and pay because cities can then go and create massive redevelopment areas to backfill the costs. The environmental and renter groups worry that their schemes to steal the value of others' property will be stopped once cities have to pay for takings.
(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
If the above are against it, I'm for it. If they are for it, I'm against it. It really is, often times, that simple.
Nice gun porn! Is that a Barett?
LOL! Gun porn. Looks like a squatter already has the domain, but that would have been a good one!
I seriously doubt anyone here in FR land is in favor of unbridled government intrusion into indiv property rights. However, there are ways around normal eminent domain procedures and I can assure you that there are law firms that regularly consult with municipalities as to how to "seize" or "rededicate" private land. I speak from near-personal experience.
One must realize that a simple letter from a municipal bureaucrat on city letterhead declaring an intention to bring an ED (eminent domain, not erectile dysfunction) action against a property is, in itself, a no-cost, no-risk immediate cloud on the title of that property.
Second, there is a law in California known as the Polanco Act. This act can compel a property owner to undertake massively costly environmental studies if in the opinion of the city a parcel may have been subject to pollution at some point. The time allowed for the completion of the environmental studies called for under this act are absolutely unattainable, often 60-90 days for the completion of the studies. And the costs of said studies can be imposed as a lien against the property if the deadlines cannot be met (and they can't......enviro/soil studies easily take many months) or if the prop owner doesn't have six figures laying around to pay for this demand. So a prop owner can literally be lien-defaulted out of his/her property. I saw a city attempt to do this, and the subterfuge they employed, including naming non-existant consultants and sending soil samples to unqualified testing labs was jaw dropping.
Believe me, when cities see the serious money in this and have a snaky developer pushing the strings, things can get quite ugly.
Proposition 90 Official Ballot
Check one
o NO
o BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Don't you mean the opposite?
Prop 90 protects private property rights. Vote YES
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
It looks like the Chamber of Commerce has teamed up with the lefties on this one.
Land grabbers unite!
http://noprop90.com/coalition/index.php
Who Opposes Proposition 90
I do believe it is a Barett. I always got a kick out of his character in the Tremor movies...
marking
You're right. I was dead tired last night and misread the post.
Don't you mean the opposite?"
yes I do.I misread the post.I was really tired.Sure am glad I didn't kill anybody.Posting while tired is dangerous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.